Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 14,298

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads

Open access
Pertea, Mihaela, Pertea, Geo M, Antonescu, Corina M, Chang, Tsung-Cheng, Mendell, Joshua T, Salzberg, Steven L·2015·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

Methods used to sequence the transcriptome often produce more than 200 million short sequences. We introduce StringTie, a computational method that applies a network flow algorithm originally developed in optimization theory, together with optional de novo assembly, to assemble these complex data sets into transcripts. When used to analyze both simulated and real data sets, StringTie produces more complete and accurate reconstructions of genes and better estimates of expression levels, compared with other leading transcript assembly programs including Cufflinks, IsoLasso, Scripture and Traph. For example, on 90 million reads from human blood, StringTie correctly assembled 10,990 transcripts, whereas the next best assembly was of 7,187 transcripts by Cufflinks, which is a 53% increase in transcripts assembled. On a simulated data set, StringTie correctly assembled 7,559 transcripts, which is 20% more than the 6,310 assembled by Cufflinks. As well as producing a more complete transcriptome assembly, StringTie runs faster on all data sets tested to date compared with other assembly software, including Cufflinks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt.3122

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Blencowe, B.J. Alternative splicing: new insights from global analyses. Cell 126, 37–47 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ponting, C.P., Oliver, P.L. & Reik, W. Evolution and functions of long noncoding RNAs. Cell 136, 629–641 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Cabili, M.N. et al. Integrative annotation of human large intergenic noncoding RNAs reveals global properties and specific subclasses. Genes Dev. 25, 1915–1927 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Salzberg, S.L. Recent advances in RNA sequence analysis. F1000 Biol. Rep. 2, 64 (2010). · DOI
  5. Garber, M., Grabherr, M.G., Guttman, M. & Trapnell, C. Computational methods for transcriptome annotation and quantification using RNA-seq. Nat. Methods 8, 469–477 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Grabherr, M.G. et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 644–652 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Schulz, M.H., Zerbino, D.R., Vingron, M. & Birney, E. Oases: robust de novo RNA-seq assembly across the dynamic range of expression levels. Bioinformatics 28, 1086–1092 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Feng, J., Li, W. & Jiang, T. Inference of isoforms from short sequence reads. J. Comput. Biol. 18, 305–321 (2011). · DOI
  9. Li, J.J., Jiang, C.R., Brown, J.B., Huang, H. & Bickel, P.J. Sparse linear modeling of next-generation mRNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) data for isoform discovery and abundance estimation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 19867–19872 (2011). · DOI
  10. Li, W., Feng, J. & Jiang, T. IsoLasso: a LASSO regression approach to RNA-Seq based transcriptome assembly. J. Comput. Biol. 18, 1693–1707 (2011). · DOI
  11. Mezlini, A.M. et al. iReckon: simultaneous isoform discovery and abundance estimation from RNA-seq data. Genome Res. 23, 519–529 (2013). · DOI
  12. Tomescu, A.I., Kuosmanen, A., Rizzi, R. & Makinen, V. A novel min-cost flow method for estimating transcript expression with RNA-Seq. BMC Bioinformatics 14 (suppl. 5), S15 (2013). · DOI
  13. Zhao, Q.Y. et al. Optimizing de novo transcriptome assembly from short-read RNA-Seq data: a comparative study. BMC Bioinformatics 12 (suppl. 14), S2 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Behr, J. et al. MITIE: simultaneous RNA-Seq-based transcript identification and quantification in multiple samples. Bioinformatics 29, 2529–2538 (2013). · DOI
  15. Griebel, T. et al. Modelling and simulating generic RNA-Seq experiments with the flux simulator. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 10073–10083 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Zimin, A.V. et al. The MaSuRCA genome assembler. Bioinformatics 29, 2669–2677 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Rehrauer, H., Opitz, L., Tan, G., Sieverling, L. & Schlapbach, R. Blind spots of quantitative RNA-seq: the limits for assessing abundance, differential expression, and isoform switching. BMC Bioinformatics 14, 370 (2013). · DOI
  18. Flicek, P. et al. Ensembl 2014. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D749–D755 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Ford, L. & Fulkerson, D. Flows in Networks (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1962).
  20. Goldberg, A. & Tarjan, R. A new approach to the maximum-flow problem. JACM 35, 921–940 (1988). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Dantzig, G. Linear Programming and Extensions (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1962). · DOI · Paper page
  22. Goldberg, A., Plotkin, S. & Tardos, E. Combinatorial algorithms for the generalized circulation problem. Math. Oper. Res. 16, 351–381 (1991). · doi:10.1287/moor.16.2.351

Cited by

See all 14,298

Metadata

Authors
Pertea, M., Pertea, G. M., Antonescu, C. M., Chang, T.-C., Mendell, J. T., & Salzberg, S. L.
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2015-02-18
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
290-295
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2104005232
Cited by
14,298
References
12
FWCI
71.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nbt.3122
The paper
Pertea, M., Pertea, G. M., Antonescu, C. M., Chang, T.-C., Mendell, J. T., & Salzberg, S. L. (2015). StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nature Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3122

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.