Cited by 1,042Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classification

Computational methods for transcriptome annotation and quantification using RNA-seq

Garber, Manuel, Grabherr, Manfred G, Guttman, Mitchell, Trapnell, Cole·2011·Nature Methods

Abstract

High-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) promises a comprehensive picture of the transcriptome, allowing for the complete annotation and quantification of all genes and their isoforms across samples. Realizing this promise requires increasingly complex computational methods. These computational challenges fall into three main categories: (i) read mapping, (ii) transcriptome reconstruction and (iii) expression quantification. Here we explain the major conceptual and practical challenges, and the general classes of solutions for each category. Finally, we highlight the interdependence between these categories and discuss the benefits for different biological applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.1613

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Paired-end reads are preferable to single-end reads for de novo transcript discovery or isoform expression analysis.

    “Furthermore, sequencing can involve single-end (SE) or paired-end (PE) reads, although the latter is preferable for de novo transcript discovery or isoform expression analysis [4, 5].”

    From A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [5]

  • Longer reads improve mappability and transcript identification.

    “Similarly, longer reads improve mappability and transcript identification [5, 6].”

    From A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [5]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garber, M., Grabherr, M. G., Guttman, M., & Trapnell, C.
Affiliations
Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Garber, Manuel
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2011-05-27
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
469-477
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W2055770801
Cited by
1,042
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 87 · 2015: 123 · 2014: 92 · 2013: 115 · 2012: 84
FWCI
8.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
Keywords
RNA-seq, transcriptome annotation, gene expression quantification, read mapping, transcriptome assembly, isoform quantification, computational genomics
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, Genomics, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review