Engineered Cpf1 variants with altered PAM specificities
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The RNA-guided endonuclease Cpf1 is a promising tool for genome editing in eukaryotic cells. However, the utility of the commonly used Acidaminococcus sp. BV3L6 Cpf1 (AsCpf1) and Lachnospiraceae bacterium ND2006 Cpf1 (LbCpf1) is limited by their requirement of a TTTV protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) in the DNA substrate. To address this limitation, we performed a structure-guided mutagenesis screen to increase the targeting range of Cpf1. We engineered two AsCpf1 variants carrying the mutations S542R/K607R and S542R/K548V/N552R, which recognize TYCV and TATV PAMs, respectively, with enhanced activities in vitro and in human cells. Genome-wide assessment of off-target activity using BLISS indicated that these variants retain high DNA-targeting specificity, which we further improved by introducing an additional non-PAM-interacting mutation. Introducing the identified PAM-interacting mutations at their corresponding positions in LbCpf1 similarly altered its PAM specificity. Together, these variants increase the targeting range of Cpf1 by approximately threefold in human coding sequences to one cleavage site per ∼11 bp.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AsCas12a has different PAM requirements and natural very high specificity.
“Among these, AsCas12a has been widely used for its different PAM requirements and a natural very high specificity17–20.”
From Allele specific repair of splicing mutations in cystic fibrosis through AsCas12a genome editing (2019) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases
Hsu, P. D., Scott, D. A., Weinstein, J. A., Ran, F. A., Konermann, S., Agarwala, V., Li, Y., Fine, E. J., Wu, X., Shalem, O., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2647 · Cited by 4,741 · see citing works
Self-citationIn vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9
Ran, F. A., Cong, L., Yan, W. X., Scott, D. A., Gootenberg, J. S., Kriz, A. J., Zetsche, B., Shalem, O., Wu, X., Makarova, K. S., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14299 · Cited by 2,687 · see citing works
Self-citationRNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems
Jiang, W., Bikard, D., Cox, D., Zhang, F., & Marraffini, L. A. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2508 · Cited by 2,429 · see citing works
Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA
Nishimasu, H., Ran, F. A., Hsu, P. D., Konermann, S., Shehata, S. I., Dohmae, N., Ishitani, R., Zhang, F., & Nureki, O. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.001 · Cited by 2,306 · see citing works
Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities
Kleinstiver, B. P., Prew, M. S., Tsai, S. Q., Topkar, V. V., Nguyen, N. T., Zheng, Z., Gonzales, A. P. W., Li, Z., Peterson, R. T., Yeh, J.-R. J., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14592 · Cited by 1,624 · see citing works
In vivo high-throughput profiling of CRISPR-Cpf1 activity
Kim, H. K., Song, M., Lee, J., Menon, A. V., Jung, S., Kang, Y.-M., Choi, J. W., Woo, E., Koh, H. C., Nam, J.-W., et al. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4104 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
BLISS is a versatile and quantitative method for genome-wide profiling of DNA double-strand breaks
Yan, W. X., Mirzazadeh, R., Garnerone, S., Scott, D., Schneider, M. W., Kallas, T., Custodio, J., Wernersson, E., Li, Y., Gao, L., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15058 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- [1]Zetsche B Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system Cell 163 759 771 2015 26422227 PMC4638220
- [2]Zetsche B Multiplex gene editing by CRISPR-Cpf1 using a single crRNA array Nat Biotechnol 35 31 34 2017 27918548 PMC5225075
- [3]Fonfara I Richter H Bratovič M Le Rhun A Charpentier E The CRISPR-associated DNA-cleaving enzyme Cpf1 also processes precursor CRISPR RNA Nature 532 517 521 2016 27096362
- [4]Kim D Genome-wide analysis reveals specificities of Cpf1 endonucleases in human cells Nat Biotechnol 34 863 868 2016 27272384
- [5]Kleinstiver BP Genome-wide specificities of CRISPR-Cas Cpf1 nucleases in human cells Nat Biotechnol 34 869 874 2016 27347757 PMC4980201
- [9]Kleinstiver BP Broadening the targeting range of Staphylococcus aureus CRISPR-Cas9 by modifying PAM recognition Nat Biotechnol 33 1293 1298 2015 26524662 PMC4689141
- [10]Hirano S Nishimasu H Ishitani R Nureki O Structural Basis for the Altered PAM Specificities of Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 Mol Cell 61 886 894 2016 26990991
- [11]Anders C Bargsten K Jinek M Structural Plasticity of PAM Recognition by Engineered Variants of the RNA-Guided Endonuclease Cas9 Mol Cell 61 895 902 2016 26990992 PMC5065715
- [14]Esvelt KM Orthogonal Cas9 proteins for RNA-guided gene regulation and editing Nat Methods 10 1116 1121 2013 24076762 PMC3844869
- [15]Gao P Yang H Rajashankar KR Huang Z Patel DJ Type V CRISPR-Cas Cpf1 endonuclease employs a unique mechanism for crRNA-mediated target DNA recognition Cell research 26 901 913 2016 27444870 PMC4973337
- [17]Slaymaker IM Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity Science 351 84 88 2016 26628643 PMC4714946
- [18]Kleinstiver BP High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects Nature 529 490 495 2016 26735016 PMC4851738
- [19]Dong D The crystal structure of Cpf1 in complex with CRISPR RNA Nature 532 522 526 2016 27096363
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity
Hu, J. H., Miller, S. M., Geurts, M. H., Tang, W., Chen, L., Sun, N., Zeina, C. M., Gao, X., Rees, H. A., Lin, Z., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature26155 · Cited by 1,552 · see citing works
Unconstrained genome targeting with near-PAMless engineered CRISPR-Cas9 variants
Walton, R. T., Christie, K. A., Whittaker, M. N., & Kleinstiver, B. P. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aba8853 · Cited by 1,233 · see citing works
Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease with expanded targeting space
Nishimasu, H., Shi, X., Ishiguro, S., Gao, L., Hirano, S., Okazaki, S., Noda, T., Abudayyeh, O. O., Gootenberg, J. S., Mori, H., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aas9129 · Cited by 1,100 · see citing works
Self-citationPast, present, and future of CRISPR genome editing technologies
Pacesa, M., Pelea, O., & Jinek, M. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.01.042 · Cited by 609 · see citing works
CRISPR/Cas system: recent advances and future prospects for genome editing
Manghwar, H., Lindsey, K., Zhang, X., & Jin, S. (2019) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2019.09.006 · Cited by 529 · see citing works
“Thewide range of Cpf1 targetable genes has been extended by engineering Cpf1 variants [26].”
BackgroundGene therapy for neurological disorders: progress and prospects
Deverman, B. E., Ravina, B. M., Bankiewicz, K. S., Paul, S. M., & Sah, D. W. Y. (2018) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2018.110 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Highly Parallel Profiling of Cas9 Variant Specificity
Schmid-Burgk, J. L., Gao, L., Li, D., Gardner, Z., Strecker, J., Lash, B., & Zhang, F. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.02.023 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Self-citationKim, H. K., Lee, S., Kim, Y., Park, J., Min, S., Choi, J. W., Huang, T. P., Yoon, S., Liu, D. R., & Kim, H. H. (2020) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-019-0505-1 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Structural basis for the altered PAM recognition by engineered CRISPR-Cpf1
Nishimasu, H., Yamano, T., Gao, L., Zhang, F., Ishitani, R., & Nureki, O. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.04.019 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Allele specific repair of splicing mutations in cystic fibrosis through AsCas12a genome editing
Maule, G., Casini, A., Montagna, C., Ramalho, A. S., De Boeck, K., Debyser, Z., Carlon, M. S., Petris, G., & Cereseto, A. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11454-9 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Genetic Variation and Unintended Risk in the Context of Old and New Breeding Techniques
Singer, S. D., Laurie, J. D., Bilichak, A., Kumar, S., & Singh, J. (2021) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689.2021.1883826 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Emerging Species and Genome Editing Tools: Future Prospects in Cyanobacterial Synthetic Biology
Gale, G. A. R., Schiavon Osorio, A. A., Mills, L. A., Wang, B., Lea-Smith, D. J., & McCormick, A. J. (2019) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms7100409 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Genome-wide CRISPR off-target DNA break detection by the BLISS method
Ballarino, R., Bouwman, B. A. M., & Crosetto, N. (2021) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-0687-2_15 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Gao, L., Cox, D. B. T., Yan, W. X., Manteiga, J. C., Schneider, M. W., Yamano, T., Nishimasu, H., Nureki, O., Crosetto, N., & Zhang, F.
- Affiliations
- Broad Institute (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
- Science for Life Laboratory (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Feng
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Published
- 2017-06-05
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 789-792
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0156
- 1546-1696
- PMC
- PMC5548640
- OpenAlex
- W2621786780
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 21.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- PMC
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (T32GM007753)
- Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation
- Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
- Broad Institute
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (26291010, 15H01463)
- Karolinska Institutet
- Vetenskapsrådet (521-2014-2866)
- National Institutes of Health
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26291010, 15H01463)
- National Institute of Mental Health (DP1MH100706, 5DP1-MH100706, R01MH110049)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007753, T32GM007287)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK097768)
- Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology (JPMJPR13L8)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Keywords
- CRISPR/Cas12a, protospacer adjacent motif, structure-guided mutagenesis, RNA-guided endonuclease, genome editing, off-target effects, bliss
- MeSH terms
- Bacterial Proteins, Endonucleases, Genetic Engineering, Humans, Genetic Variation, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Acidaminococcus, HEK293 Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review