Cited by 463Climate Change Communication and PerceptionClimate Change Policy and EconomicsPro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 33 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world

Open access

Bain, Paul G., Milfont, Taciano L., Kashima, Yoshihisa, Bilewicz, Michał, Doron, Guy, Garðarsdóttir, Ragna B., Gouveia, Valdiney V., Guan, Yanjun, Johansson, Lars-Olof, Pasquali, Carlota, Corral-Verdugo, Victor, Aragones, Juan Ignacio, Utsugi, Akira, Demarque, Christophe, Otto, Siegmar, Park, Joonha, Soland, Martin, Steg, Linda, González, Roberto, Lebedeva, Nadezhda, Madsen, Ole Jacob, Wagner, Claire, Akotia, Charity S., Kurz, Tim, Saiz, José L., Schultz, P. Wesley, Einarsdóttir, Gró, Saviolidis, Nina M.·2016·Nature Climate Change

DOI 10.1038/nclimate2814

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nclimate2814

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 33 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedn = 6,196
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Rests on an assumption: Students typically occupy similar socio-economic positions across countries.
- Rests on an assumption: Climate change requires a global solution.
- Rests on an assumption: Researchers have focused on some co-benefits, such as reduced pollution or economic development, without an integrated approach to understand how co-benefits are related and comparing their importance for motivating public action.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Commonly cited co-benefits addressing Dysfunction (for example, pollution, disease 11,12,15,16 ) were actually the weakest motivators of action overall.”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > LETTERS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] Nemet, G. F., Holloway, T. & Meier, P. Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking. Environ. Res. Lett. 5, 014007 (2010). source
- Not checked yetcites [12] West, J. J. et al. Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health. Nature Clim. Change 3, 885–889 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [15] Thurston, G. D. Mitigation policy: Health co-benefits. Nature Clim. Change 3, 863–864 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [16] Maibach, E. W., Nisbet, M., Baldwin, P., Akerlof, K. & Diao, G. Reframing climate change as a public health issue: An exploratory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health 10, 299 (2010); http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/299 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes

Show all 32 claims

It may state two separate claims as one. 10
Probably not a substantial claim. 29

In the paper
“However, scales created to reflect each quadrant showed low reliabilities across many countries and were excluded from analyses.”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > Societal values.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] Schwartz, S. H. in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 25 (ed. Zanna, M. P.) 1–65 (Academic Press, 1992).
Strength:plain· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“mitigation efforts can reduce pollution 11,12”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > Communicating co-benefits could motivate action on climate change where traditional approaches have stalled.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] Nemet, G. F., Holloway, T. & Meier, P. Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking. Environ. Res. Lett. 5, 014007 (2010). source
- Not checked yetcites [12] West, J. J. et al. Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health. Nature Clim. Change 3, 885–889 (2013). source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“support economic development through green industries 13,14”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > Communicating co-benefits could motivate action on climate change where traditional approaches have stalled.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] UNEP Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication—A Synthesis for Policy Makers (2011); http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy
- Not checked yetcites [14] Fabian, N. Economics: Support low-carbon investment. Nature 519, 27–29 (2015). source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“These issues are strongly linked to political ideology [1][2][3][4]”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > Communicating co-benefits could motivate action on climate change where traditional approaches have stalled.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1][2][3][4]
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Communicating climate science is now failing to persuade those who remain unconvinced climate change is real ('unconvinced' , or climate sceptics) 10”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > Communicating co-benefits could motivate action on climate change where traditional approaches have stalled.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Whitmarsh, L. Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 690–700 (2011). source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Environmental citizenship intentions items were taken from an existing measure 32”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > Motivations to act on climate change.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A. & Kalof, L. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 6, 81–97 (1999).
Strength:plain· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“research suggesting that importance and co-benefit messages may counteract each other when used together, at least for conservatives in the United States 29”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > LETTERS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] Gromet, D. M., Kunreuther, H. & Larrick, R. P. Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 9314–9319 (2013). source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibrated
Tests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“they then rated their country in 2050 on scales from the validated collective futures model 17”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > Co-benefits scenarios.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [17] Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., Bongiorno, R. & Jeffries, C. Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nature Clim. Change 2, 600–603 (2012). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Participants then completed a screening item asking them to choose from the following three options used in previous research 17”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > Climate change beliefs.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [17] Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., Bongiorno, R. & Jeffries, C. Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nature Clim. Change 2, 600–603 (2012). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This scale was drawn from several sources [32][33][34]”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > Motivations to act on climate change.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A. & Kalof, L. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 6, 81–97 (1999).
- Not checked yetcites [33] McDonald, R. I., Fielding, K. S. & Louis, W. R. Energizing and de-motivating effects of norm conflict. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 39, 57–72 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [34] Whitmarsh, L. & O’Neill, S. Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. J. Environ. Psychol. 30, 305–314 (2010). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Political ideology was measured using a single item from previous research 35”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > Political ideology.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Schwartz, S. et al. Basic personal values underlie and give coherence to political values: A cross national study in 15 countries. Polit. Behav. 36, 899–930 (2014). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

38 of 38

The paper relies on this without support.
Students typically occupy similar socio-economic positions across countries.
“University student samples were selected to facilitate comparisons, as students typically occupy similar socio-economic positions across countries.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Climate change requires a global solution.
“Second, climate change requires a global solution, but most co-benefits research has been conducted in Western countries”
The paper relies on this without support.
Researchers have focused on some co-benefits, such as reduced pollution or economic development, without an integrated approach to understand how co-benefits are related and comparing their importance for motivating public action.
“First, researchers have focused on some co-benefits, such as reduced pollution or economic development, without an integrated approach to understand how co-benefits are related and comparing their importance for motivating public action.”

3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
Untitled work
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
Stern, P. C. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175 · Cited by 8,682
Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005 · Cited by 4,567
Untitled work
(1999) · Western CEDAR (Western Washington University) · Cited by 3,944
The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public's Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011) · The Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x · Cited by 2,340
Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours
Whitmarsh, L., & O'Neill, S. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003 · Cited by 1,765
Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world
Lee, T. M., Markowitz, E. M., Howe, P. D., Ko, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2728 · Cited by 1,506
Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003 · Cited by 1,217
Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience
Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Butler, C., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2011) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1059 · Cited by 1,074

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Pew Research Center Thirteen Years of the Public’s Top Priorities (2014); http://www.people-press.org/interactive/top-priorities

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 463

Policy or scientific messaging? Strategic framing in a case of subnational climate change conflict
Cann, H. W. (2021) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12438 · Cited by 13
Climate, air quality, and health benefits of a carbon fee-and-rebate bill in Massachusetts, USA
Buonocore, J. J., Levy, J. I., Guinto, R., & Bernstein, A. S. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aae62c · Cited by 13
Effect of acetylene addition in safflower biodiesel fueled CI engine–an experimental study
Balasubramanian, K., & Krishnan, P. (2019) · Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects · doi:10.1080/15567036.2019.1678700 · Cited by 13
Management through hope: an ethnography of Denmark’s Renewable Energy Island
Papazu, I. (2016) · Journal of Organizational Ethnography · doi:10.1108/joe-11-2015-0025 · Cited by 13
Forests and Climate Change: Introduction to a special section
Keenan, R. J. (2015) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2015.11.039 · Cited by 13
The complex relationship between carbon literacy and pro-environmental actions among engineering students
Ram, S.-A., MacLean, H. L., Tihanyi, D., Hannah, L., & Posen, I. D. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20634 · Cited by 15
A framework for classifying climate change questions used in public opinion surveys
Kenny, J., Geese, L., Jordan, A., & Lorenzoni, I. (2024) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2024.2429264 · Cited by 12
A mental health focus to amplify climate resilience actions
Mishra, J., Han, H. C., & Ramanathan, V. (2025) · npj Climate Action · doi:10.1038/s44168-025-00263-0 · Cited by 12
Yawning at the apocalypse
Brick, C., & van der Linden, S. (2018) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.17863/cam.33639 · Cited by 12
Communicating climate change as a generational issue: experimental effects on youth worry, motivation and belief in collective action
Timmons, S., Andersson, Y., & Lunn, P. (2024) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2024.2341080 · Cited by 13
Beyond the individual: testing and applying a collective protection motivation model for pro-environmental behaviors
Chevrier, M., Bosone, L., Zenasni, F., & Delhomme, P. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07517-4 · Cited by 13
Spillover in Sustainable Consumer Behavior: A Matter of Commitment
Henn, L., Kaiser, F. G., Adler, M., Elf, P., & Gatersleben, B. (2025) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.70052 · Cited by 11
A bibliometric review of climate change cascading effects: past focus and future prospects
Zhou, T., Yang, D., Meng, H., Wan, M., Zhang, S., & Guo, R. (2023) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-023-04191-z · Cited by 11
From hamburgers to holidays: Modelling the climate change impact of reducing meat consumption according to UK consumer preferences
Steinitz, F., Johnson, N., & Staffell, I. (2024) · Current Research in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.crsust.2024.100249 · Cited by 11
Assessing the impacts of changing climate on forest ecosystem services and livelihood of Balakot mountainous communities
Shahzad, L., Tahir, A., Sharif, F., Haq, I. U., & Mukhtar, H. (2019) · Pakistan Journal of Botany · doi:10.30848/pjb2019-4(1 · Cited by 11
Making climate action meaningful: Communication practices in the New Zealand climate movement
Oosterman, J. (2016) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17019926 · Cited by 11
Investigating how economic and national identity loss messages impact climate change policy support
Klas, A., Clarke, E. J. R., Fielding, K. S., Mackay, M. I., Lohmann, S., & Ling, M. (2022) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-022-03472-2 · Cited by 10
Spatial (mis)alignment between climate-related risks and risk perceptions across the US
Hunt, L. G., Williamson, M. A., & Hillis, V. (2023) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/acb06c · Cited by 10
Evaluating climate change competence in pre-teens: Instrument development and validation
Ortega-Quevedo, V., Luengo, M. A. L., Ferrari, E., & Ruíz, C. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102329 · Cited by 10
Increasing wellbeing through energy demand reduction for net zero: Citizen perceptions of co-benefits of local measures
Mininni, G. M., Foxon, T. J., Copeland, C., Martinez, B. A., Brown, D., Brisbois, M. C., Contreras, G. A. T., Stack-Maddox, S., Lacey‐Barnacle, M., & Jaccarini, C. (2024) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103799 · Cited by 11
Public opinion foundations of the clean energy transition
Gazmararian, A. F., Mildenberger, M., & Tingley, D. H. (2025) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2025.2508563 · Cited by 12
Examining relations between left-wing authoritarianism and environmentalism
Milfont, T. L., & Osborne, D. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102275 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
A biodiversity-employment framework to protect biodiversity
Ruault, J., Tour, A. D. L., Évette, A., Allain, S., & Callois, J.-M. (2021) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107238 · Cited by 10
Perceived cultural impacts of climate change motivate climate action and support for climate policy
Tam, K., Leung, A. K. ‐., & Koh, B. (2022) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-022-03337-8 · Cited by 10
Formation mechanism of environmental protection behaviours of community residents
Xu, R., Luo, F., Chen, X., Li, M., & Barua, Z. (2020) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k-12-2018-0653 · Cited by 10
Channeling environmentalism into climate policy: an experimental study of Fridays for Future participants from Germany
Soliev, I., Janssen, M. A., Theesfeld, I., Pritchard, C., Pirscher, F., & Lee, A. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac30f7 · Cited by 11
Promoting health through climate change mitigation in Europe
Tonne, C. C., Sieber, S., Filippidou, F., Tsiropoulos, I., Petropoulou, V., Kiesewetter, G., Klimont, Z., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Witzke, P., Springmann, M., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(25)00085-3 · Cited by 9
Greening Water Risks
López-Gunn, E., van der Keur, P., Cauwenbergh, N. V., Coent, P. L., & Giordano, R. (2023) · Water security in a new world · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25308-9 · Cited by 9
On proposing relational environmental metaphors to stimulate engagement and foster well-being in the midst of climate change
Bellehumeur, C. R., & Carignan, L.-M. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1377205 · Cited by 10
Dissemination and perception of adaptation co-benefits: Insights from the coastal area of Bangladesh
Rahman, S. M., & Mori, A. (2020) · World Development Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.wdp.2020.100247 · Cited by 9
Applying Roadmapping and Conceptual Modeling to the Energy Transition: A Local Case Study
Müller, G. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13073683 · Cited by 9
Synergistic effects of new energy and low-carbon pilot dual policies on pollution and carbon reduction: A causal analysis based on double machine learning
Gao, R., Li, W., & Zeng, Q. (2025) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2025.09.012 · Cited by 8
Learning by Doing: Co-Benefits Drive National Plans for Climate and Air Quality Governance
Mewes, C., & Unger, C. (2021) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos12091184 · Cited by 8
Clarifying longitudinal relations between individuals' support for human rights and climate change beliefs
Athy, A. E., Milojev, P., Gray, N. H., Osborne, D., Sibley, C. G., & Milfont, T. L. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101875 · Cited by 8
Self-citation
Climate policy as social policy? A comprehensive assessment of the economic impact of climate action in the UK
Sudmant, A. H., Boyle, D. K., Higgins-Lavery, R., Gouldson, A., Boyle, A., Fulker, J., & Brogan, J. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-024-00955-9 · Cited by 8
Testing the effects of health-benefit, environmental-benefit and co-benefit priming for promoting sustainable food choice and their psychological mechanisms: A randomized controlled trial combined with eye tracking
Chen, M., Chen, Y., Qi, R., Hsiao, J. H., Lam, W., & Liao, Q. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102485 · Cited by 8
Uncovering driving forces of co-benefits achieved by eco-industrial development strategies at the scale of industrial park
Lin, Y., Liu, Z., Liu, R., Yu, X., & Zhang, L. (2019) · Energy & Environment · doi:10.1177/0958305x19857908 · Cited by 8
Climate to COVID, global to local, policies to people: a biopsychosocial ecological framework for syndemic prevention and response in behavioral medicine
Persad-Clem, R., Hoerster, K. D., Romano, E. F. T., Huizar, N., & Maier, K. J. (2022) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibac021 · Cited by 8
Right and left-wing views: A story of disagreement on environmental issues but agreement on solutions.
Lalot, F., Büttner, C. M., Özkeçeci, H., & Abrams, D. (2022) · Translational Issues in Psychological Science · doi:10.1037/tps0000342 · Cited by 9
Climate Finance and the Peace Dividend, Articulating the Co-benefits Argument
Wong, C. (2022) · International political economy series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12619-2_9 · Cited by 8
The Impact of International Cooperative Initiatives on Biodiversity (ICIBs)
Arts, B. J. M., Buijs, A. E., Gevers, H., Mattijssen, T., Kok, M., van Oorschot, M. M. P., & Schoolenberg, M. A. (2017) · doi:10.18174/422567 · Cited by 8
Neuroscience and climate action: intersecting pathways for brain and planetary health
Todorova, B., Steininger, M. O., Lamm, C., & Doell, K. C. (2025) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101522 · Cited by 7
Ecospirituality Predicts Pro-Environmental Outcomes Across Cultures
Billet, M. I., & Baimel, A. (2026) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/00139165261421073 · Cited by 9
Examining the Relationship between the Dimensions of the Climate-Change Competence (C3): Testing for Mediation and Moderation
Ferrari, E., Abad, F. M., & Ruíz, C. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14031895 · Cited by 7
Understanding the public’s perceptions of the importance, management, and conservation of biodiversity
Halkos, G., & Matsiori, S. (2022) · Economic Analysis and Policy · doi:10.1016/j.eap.2022.05.013 · Cited by 7
Worldviews about change: Their structure and their implications for understanding responses to sustainability, technology, and political change
Bain, P. G., Bongiorno, R., Tinson, K., Heanue, A., Gómez, Á., Guan, Y., Лебедева, Н. М., Kashima, E. S., González, R., Chen, S. X., et al. (2023) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12574 · Cited by 7
Self-citation
The Demand for Voluntary Carbon Dioxide Removal: Experimental Evidence from an Afforestation Project in Germany
Bartels, L. E., Kesternich, M., & Löschel, A. (2024) · Land Economics · doi:10.3368/le.100.4.070523-0060r1 · Cited by 7
A place in the sun: Farmers' co-benefits from solar irrigation in Bangladesh
Buisson, M.-C., Mitra, A., Hounsa, T., Habib, M. A., & Mukherji, A. (2024) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107973 · Cited by 7
Co-benefits associated with public support for climate-friendly COVID-19 recovery policies and political activism
Thaker, J. J., & Floyd, B. (2021) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.20050208 · Cited by 7
Geometrical Stability and Nonlinear Optical Properties of Crystallogen and Pnictogen Fullerene Analogues
AbouYoussef, M. L., El-Kemary, M. A., Dovesi, R., & El‐Kelany, K. E. (2022) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.2c04677 · Cited by 7
Perception of climate change and mitigation strategies in two European Mediterranean deltas
Ernoul, L., Vareltzidou, S., Charpentier, M., Muranyi-Kovacs, C., UMR ESPACE, U. A.-M., & Thermaikos Golf Protected Areas Management Authority, H. T. (2020) · AIMS Geosciences · doi:10.3934/geosci.2020032 · Cited by 7
Systems Engineering for the Energy Transition: Potential Contributions and Limitations
Kirkels, A. F., Evers, V. H. M., & Müller, G. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13105423 · Cited by 8
Do people really support conservation? Evidence from China and the United States
Wang, M. (2022) · Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.cjpre.2022.03.002 · Cited by 7
Overcome the Deficit Model by Applying the CAUSE Model to Climate Change Communication
Rowan, K. E., Engblom, A., Hathaway, J., Lloyd, R., Vorster, I., Anderson, E. Z., & Akerlof, K. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118857205.ch16 · Cited by 7
The appeal of climate program framing depends on climate beliefs: a conjoint survey experiment among US agricultural producers
Hunt, L. G., & Hillis, V. (2025) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2024.2447486 · Cited by 6
Pathways to health: Reporting on health co-benefits from urban climate mitigation action varies by sector
Anton, B., Haines, A., Green, R., Meinsma, N., Reynolds, T., & Whitmee, S. (2025) · npj Urban Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s42949-025-00311-y · Cited by 6
What makes people act climate-friendly? A decision-making path model for designing effective climate change policies
Otte, P. P. (2021) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2021.10.003 · Cited by 6
Climate-Related Co-Benefits and the Case of Swedish Policy
Karlsson, M., Westling, N., & Lindgren, O. (2023) · Climate · doi:10.3390/cli11020040 · Cited by 6
Integrating Utopian Constructs: A Preliminary Investigation of Their Similarities and Predictive Power on Social Change Intentions
Chevrier, M., Delhomme, P., Zenasni, F., & Bosone, L. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16198320 · Cited by 6
Ideological underpinnings of climate change beliefs: A 13-year longitudinal study
Milfont, T. L., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102554 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
The role of collective positive prospection in motivating social change: A scoping review of methods and findings
Chevrier, M., Bosone, L., Zenasni, F., & Delhomme, P. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102576 · Cited by 11
Ecosystem Based Adaptation: Concept and Terminology in Strategic Adaptation Planning (Municipal and Inter-Municipal) in Portugal
Cousiño, A., & Penha‐Lopes, G. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13116145 · Cited by 6
Resident motivations, policy types and multisphere waste sorting intentions in China from a dual-interest integration perspective: An expanded goal-framing theory
Cao, G., Liu, P., & Cao, R. Z. (2024) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107596 · Cited by 6
Multi-criteria Approaches to Ancillary Effects: The Example of E-Mobility
Vögele, S., Ball, C. S., & Kuckshinrichs, W. (2019) · Springer climate · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30978-7_9 · Cited by 6
Transitions to sustainability, lifestyles changes and human well-being: cultural, environmental and political challenges ((Transiciones hacia la sostenibilidad, cambios de estilos de vida y bienestar humano: desafíos culturales, medioambientales y políticos))
Carrus, G., Pirchio, S., & Tiberio, L. (2020) · PsyEcology Bilingual Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1080/21711976.2020.1734411 · Cited by 6
The role of co-benefits in motivating climate change mitigation – Experimental evidence
Feldhaus, C., Gleue, M., Löschel, A., & Werner, P. (2025) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108783 · Cited by 5
Planning, Urban Design, and Architecture for Climate Action
Raven, J., Leone, M. F., Bhaduri, S., Braneon, C. V., Corbett, D. M., Driskell, D. C., Eicker, U., Fernández, J., Gan, J., Hürlimann, A., et al. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009643894 · Cited by 5
A megastudy of behavioral interventions to catalyze public, political, and financial climate advocacy
Goldwert, D., Constantino, S. M., Patel, Y., Sabherwal, A. C., Semken, C., Brick, C., Castiglione, A., Debnath, R., Doell, K. C., Dubey, R., et al. (2026) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf400 · Cited by 7
Distrust and reflexive impotence in the net zero transition: findings from a longitudinal deliberative mini-public
Ainscough, J., Lewis, P., & Farrow, L. (2024) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-024-03806-2 · Cited by 5
From parenthood to planet care? The evolution of environmental and climate concerns during family formation
Zoch, G., & Kapelle, N. (2025) · Population and Environment · doi:10.1007/s11111-025-00490-x · Cited by 5
Social influence and carbon dioxide mitigation
Ganguli, J. V., & Mengel, F. (2025) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105558 · Cited by 5
Incremental advancements in public health adaptation to climate change in Florida
Holmes, T., & Eisenman, D. P. (2019) · Cities & Health · doi:10.1080/23748834.2019.1614725 · Cited by 5
Beliefs, perceived risk, obstacles and intention to act. An explanatory model for mitigation and coping behaviours regarding climate change ( Creencias, percepción de riesgo, obstáculos e intención de actuar. Un modelo explicativo de conductas de mitigación y afrontamiento ante el cambio climático )
Hernández, L. F. B., Corral-Verdugo, V., Castro, S. B. E., Castillo, M. A. S., & Zúñiga, J. O. (2021) · PsyEcology Bilingual Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1080/21711976.2020.1827660 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
A conciliatory and persuasive social campaign changes owner behavior to reduce cats' hunting
MacDonald, E. A., Farnworth, M. J., van Heezik, Y., Stafford, K. J., & Linklater, W. L. (2024) · Conservation Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/csp2.13152 · Cited by 5
Climate change beliefs and behaviours: Data collected from 30-year-old offspring and their parents in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)
Major‐Smith, D., Halstead, I. N., Major-Smith, K., Iles‐Caven, Y., House, J., Northstone, K., & Golding, J. (2024) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.22568.1 · Cited by 5
Adapting Environmental Ethics and Behaviors: Toward a Posthuman Rhetoric of Community Engagement
Shirley, B. (2019) · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) · doi:10.26076/7jt1-7k38 · Cited by 5
Remote sensing (RS) monitoring of mangroves plantation against the Guinness world record (GWR) of maximum plantation in Indus delta
Mahar, G. A., Hussain, B., Wagan, R. A., Hussain, A. T., & Khan, S. (2020) · Pakistan Journal of Botany · doi:10.30848/pjb2020-4(16 · Cited by 5
Cultural Variation in the Development of Beliefs About Conservation
Busch, J. T. A., Watson‐Jones, R. E., & Legare, C. H. (2020) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12909 · Cited by 5
Understanding Lay Individuals’ Mental Models of Sustainability
Geiger, N., & Swim, J. K. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-31883-3_17 · Cited by 5
Embedding nature-based solutions into the social cost of carbon
Han, W., & Chen, W. Y. (2022) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2022.107431 · Cited by 6
Sustainable occupational opportunities in protected areas in Brazil
Tofeti, A. R., & dos Santos, V. (2020) · World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin · doi:10.1080/14473828.2020.1758398 · Cited by 5
Nuclear Power and Japan's Collective Future: Understanding Beliefs About How Nuclear Policies Will Affect Society
Park, J., Bain, P. G., & Kusumi, T. (2015) · Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology · doi:10.1017/prp.2015.9 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
The political psychology of climate denial
Tal, A., & Paz, S. (2025) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-025-02523-7 · Cited by 4
Decoupling of environmental impacts in the iron and steel sector is still needed beyond emissions
Li, C., & Pradhan, P. (2024) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.3204 · Cited by 4
Cooking up change: Identity, practice, and policy in Australian household stovetop electrification
Boddington, S. J. (2024) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103860 · Cited by 4
Balancing Equity and Urgency: Reshaping Global Economic Institutions for a Just Low-Carbon Transition
Leal‐Arcas, R., AlTheyab, N. A., AlFraih, G., Alhanaya, R., & Alshehri, M. (2025) · The IUP Journal of International Relations · doi:10.71329/iupjir/2025.19.2.79-133 · Cited by 4
Warm glow and pro-environmental behavior: Supportive evidence from behavioral tasks
Zhou, L., Brick, C., Sachisthal, M. S. M., Aldoh, A., & Sauter, D. A. (2026) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2026.102902 · Cited by 7
Ecological introspection resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic: The threat perception of the pandemic was positively related to pro-environmental behaviors
Zuo, S., Wang, F., Hong, Y., Chan, H., Chiu, C. P., & Wang, X. (2023) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2023.2190923 · Cited by 4
The impact of silicon on the solidification of duplex lightweight steels
Balaško, T., Burja, J., & Medved, J. (2023) · Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry · doi:10.1007/s10973-023-12381-0 · Cited by 4
What determines local attitudes towards Jordan’s renewable energy transition? Evidence from household surveys
Weko, S., & Schuch, E. (2024) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2024.2353146 · Cited by 4
Mental models, communication, and engagement in marine projects
Boschetti, F., & Andreotta, M. (2016) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsw240 · Cited by 4
Exploring the Impact of Climate Change on the Outbreak of Early Twenty-First-Century Violence in the Middle East and North Africa and the Potential of Permaculture as an Effective Adaptation
Karim, M. E. (2017) · Weather Climate and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-16-0130.1 · Cited by 4
The synergistic reduction effect of PM2.5 and CO2: evidence from national key ecological functional areas in China
Mo, B., Hou, M., & Huo, X. (2024) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-024-32063-0 · Cited by 4
Associations between religiosity and climate change beliefs and behaviours in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)
Major‐Smith, D., Halstead, I. N., Golding, J., & Major-Smith, K. (2025) · PLOS Climate · doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000469 · Cited by 4
Sweet spots are in the food system: Structural adjustments to co-control regional pollutants and national GHG emissions in China
Liu, L.-J., Liang, Q., Creutzig, F., Ward, H., & Zhang, K. (2020) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106590 · Cited by 4
Protect Me from What I Want: Understanding Excessive Polluting Behavior and the Willingness to Act
Garðarsdóttir, R. B., Andradóttir, H. Ó., & Þorsteinsson, Þ. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12145867 · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Global Mental Health, Planetary Health, and the Ethical Co-Benefit
Lewis, J. L. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-66296-7_22 · Cited by 4
Glimmers of hope: a global Green New Deal is feasible
Fesenfeld, L. (2021) · GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society · doi:10.14512/gaia.30.3.4 · Cited by 5
Climate Imagineering
Low, S. (2021) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · doi:10.33540/668 · Cited by 4
Key Motivations, Barriers, and Enablers Toward Net-Zero Cities: An Integrated Framework and Large Survey in Japan
Myasoedov, F., & Ialnazov, D. (2025) · Climate · doi:10.3390/cli13070134 · Cited by 3

Authors: Bain, P. G., Milfont, T. L., Kashima, Y., Bilewicz, M., Doron, G., Garðarsdóttir, R. B., Gouveia, V. V., Guan, Y., Johansson, L.-O., Pasquali, C., Corral-Verdugo, V., Aragones, J. I., Utsugi, A., Demarque, C., Otto, S., Park, J., Soland, M., Steg, L., González, R., Lebedeva, N., Madsen, O. J., Wagner, C., Akotia, C. S., Kurz, T., Saiz, J. L., Schultz, P. W., Einarsdóttir, G., & Saviolidis, N. M.
Affiliations: Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
The University of Melbourne (AU)
University of Warsaw (PL)
Reichman University (IL)
University of Iceland (IS)
Universidade Federal da Paraíba (BR)
University of Surrey (GB)
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Universidad Simón Bolívar (VE)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (FR)
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Nagoya University of Commerce and Business (JP)
University of Zurich (CH)
University of Groningen (NL)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
University of Oslo (NO)
University of Pretoria (ZA)
University of Ghana (GH)
University of Exeter (GB)
California State University, San Marcos (US)
Corresponding author: Bain, Paul G.
ORCID: Bain, Paul G.
Milfont, Taciano L.
Kashima, Yoshihisa
Bilewicz, Michał
Doron, Guy
Garðarsdóttir, Ragna B.
Gouveia, Valdiney V.
Guan, Yanjun
Johansson, Lars-Olof
Utsugi, Akira
Demarque, Christophe
Otto, Siegmar
Park, Joonha
Soland, Martin
Steg, Linda
González, Roberto
Lebedeva, Nadezhda
Madsen, Ole Jacob
Akotia, Charity S.
Kurz, Tim
Schultz, P. Wesley
Einarsdóttir, Gró
Venue: Nature Climate Change
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2015-09-28
Volume: 6
Issue: 2
Pages: 154-157
ISSN: 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
1758-6798
DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2814
OpenAlex: W2259778813
Semantic Scholar: e1a0851783048eb2d7dcb3003ed4c5f6cac87dec
Cited by: 447
References: 32
Citations by year: 2026: 31 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 5
FWCI: 85.15
Type: journal article
Language: en
Update notices: erratum (2016-04-27)
Open access: bronze
doi.org
Licence: www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
www.springer.com/tdm (vor)
Locations: Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
Pure (University of Bath) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
HAL AMU (submittedVersion)
Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
John Spoor Broome Library Institutional Repository (California State University) (submittedVersion)
LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Omeka S (Universidad de La Frontera) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion)
California State University ScholarWorks (system-wide DSpace) (submittedVersion)
Funders: Royal Society
Royal Society Te Apārangi (E1908)
Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki (IP2014 002273)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (5‐100)
Centro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión Social (15130009)
Australian Research Council (DP130102229, DP0984678)
Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias (# 15130009)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
Keywords: pro-environmental behavior, political ideology, economic development, climate change communication, gender and age differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks