Cited by 463Climate Change Communication and PerceptionClimate Change Policy and EconomicsPro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 33 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world

Open access

Bain, Paul G., Milfont, Taciano L., Kashima, Yoshihisa, Bilewicz, Michał, Doron, Guy, Garðarsdóttir, Ragna B., Gouveia, Valdiney V., Guan, Yanjun, Johansson, Lars-Olof, Pasquali, Carlota, Corral-Verdugo, Victor, Aragones, Juan Ignacio, Utsugi, Akira, Demarque, Christophe, Otto, Siegmar, Park, Joonha, Soland, Martin, Steg, Linda, González, Roberto, Lebedeva, Nadezhda, Madsen, Ole Jacob, Wagner, Claire, Akotia, Charity S., Kurz, Tim, Saiz, José L., Schultz, P. Wesley, Einarsdóttir, Gró, Saviolidis, Nina M.·2016·Nature Climate Change

DOI 10.1038/nclimate2814

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nclimate2814

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 33 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedn = 6,196
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Rests on an assumption: Students typically occupy similar socio-economic positions across countries.
- Rests on an assumption: Climate change requires a global solution.
- Rests on an assumption: Researchers have focused on some co-benefits, such as reduced pollution or economic development, without an integrated approach to understand how co-benefits are related and comparing their importance for motivating public action.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Commonly cited co-benefits addressing Dysfunction (for example, pollution, disease 11,12,15,16 ) were actually the weakest motivators of action overall.”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > LETTERS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] Nemet, G. F., Holloway, T. & Meier, P. Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking. Environ. Res. Lett. 5, 014007 (2010). source
- Not checked yetcites [12] West, J. J. et al. Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health. Nature Clim. Change 3, 885–889 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [15] Thurston, G. D. Mitigation policy: Health co-benefits. Nature Clim. Change 3, 863–864 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [16] Maibach, E. W., Nisbet, M., Baldwin, P., Akerlof, K. & Diao, G. Reframing climate change as a public health issue: An exploratory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health 10, 299 (2010); http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/299 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes

Show all 32 claims

It may state two separate claims as one. 10
Probably not a substantial claim. 29

In the paper
“However, scales created to reflect each quadrant showed low reliabilities across many countries and were excluded from analyses.”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > Societal values.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] Schwartz, S. H. in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 25 (ed. Zanna, M. P.) 1–65 (Academic Press, 1992).
Strength:plain· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“mitigation efforts can reduce pollution 11,12”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > Communicating co-benefits could motivate action on climate change where traditional approaches have stalled.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] Nemet, G. F., Holloway, T. & Meier, P. Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking. Environ. Res. Lett. 5, 014007 (2010). source
- Not checked yetcites [12] West, J. J. et al. Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health. Nature Clim. Change 3, 885–889 (2013). source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“support economic development through green industries 13,14”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > Communicating co-benefits could motivate action on climate change where traditional approaches have stalled.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] UNEP Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication—A Synthesis for Policy Makers (2011); http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy
- Not checked yetcites [14] Fabian, N. Economics: Support low-carbon investment. Nature 519, 27–29 (2015). source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“These issues are strongly linked to political ideology [1][2][3][4]”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > Communicating co-benefits could motivate action on climate change where traditional approaches have stalled.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1][2][3][4]
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Communicating climate science is now failing to persuade those who remain unconvinced climate change is real ('unconvinced' , or climate sceptics) 10”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > Communicating co-benefits could motivate action on climate change where traditional approaches have stalled.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Whitmarsh, L. Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 690–700 (2011). source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Environmental citizenship intentions items were taken from an existing measure 32”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > Motivations to act on climate change.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A. & Kalof, L. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 6, 81–97 (1999).
Strength:plain· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“research suggesting that importance and co-benefit messages may counteract each other when used together, at least for conservatives in the United States 29”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > LETTERS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] Gromet, D. M., Kunreuther, H. & Larrick, R. P. Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 9314–9319 (2013). source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibrated
Tests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“they then rated their country in 2050 on scales from the validated collective futures model 17”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > Co-benefits scenarios.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [17] Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., Bongiorno, R. & Jeffries, C. Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nature Clim. Change 2, 600–603 (2012). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Participants then completed a screening item asking them to choose from the following three options used in previous research 17”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > Climate change beliefs.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [17] Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., Bongiorno, R. & Jeffries, C. Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nature Clim. Change 2, 600–603 (2012). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This scale was drawn from several sources [32][33][34]”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > Motivations to act on climate change.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A. & Kalof, L. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 6, 81–97 (1999).
- Not checked yetcites [33] McDonald, R. I., Fielding, K. S. & Louis, W. R. Energizing and de-motivating effects of norm conflict. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 39, 57–72 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [34] Whitmarsh, L. & O’Neill, S. Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. J. Environ. Psychol. 30, 305–314 (2010). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Political ideology was measured using a single item from previous research 35”
§ Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance.However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles [1][2][3][4] , and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries 5,6 .Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change 7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real.We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits 8 , distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence).Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important.Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides.These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. > Political ideology.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Schwartz, S. et al. Basic personal values underlie and give coherence to political values: A cross national study in 15 countries. Polit. Behav. 36, 899–930 (2014). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibrated
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passes
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

38 of 38

The paper relies on this without support.
Students typically occupy similar socio-economic positions across countries.
“University student samples were selected to facilitate comparisons, as students typically occupy similar socio-economic positions across countries.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Climate change requires a global solution.
“Second, climate change requires a global solution, but most co-benefits research has been conducted in Western countries”
The paper relies on this without support.
Researchers have focused on some co-benefits, such as reduced pollution or economic development, without an integrated approach to understand how co-benefits are related and comparing their importance for motivating public action.
“First, researchers have focused on some co-benefits, such as reduced pollution or economic development, without an integrated approach to understand how co-benefits are related and comparing their importance for motivating public action.”

3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
Untitled work
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
Stern, P. C. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175 · Cited by 8,682
Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005 · Cited by 4,567
Untitled work
(1999) · Western CEDAR (Western Washington University) · Cited by 3,944
The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public's Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011) · The Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x · Cited by 2,340
Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours
Whitmarsh, L., & O'Neill, S. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003 · Cited by 1,765
Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world
Lee, T. M., Markowitz, E. M., Howe, P. D., Ko, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2728 · Cited by 1,506
Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003 · Cited by 1,217
Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience
Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Butler, C., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2011) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1059 · Cited by 1,074

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Pew Research Center Thirteen Years of the Public’s Top Priorities (2014); http://www.people-press.org/interactive/top-priorities

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 463

On the defensive: reactance and trustworthiness in processing written information about climate change
Bilfinger, L., Brummernhenrich, B., & Jucks, R. (2026) · Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cresp.2026.100262 · Cited by 3
Repairing clothes and feeling good: Do positive emotions influence sustainable clothing behaviors?
Zhou, L., Bosshard, A., Sauter, D. A., & Brick, C. (2026) · Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cresp.2026.100264 · Cited by 3
How to win public support for financial climate policies: both climate anxiety and economic anticipation work
Li, Y., Liang, Y., Tian, J., Sun, Y., & Meng, M. (2023) · Climate and Development · doi:10.1080/17565529.2023.2266420 · Cited by 3
Seeing is more than believing: Personal experience increases climate action
Wei, X., Yu, F., & Peng, K. (2024) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12731 · Cited by 3
Bridging the Ideological Divide: Communicating the Positive Economic Impact of Climate Policy to Persuade the Right
Bertolotti, M., & Catellani, P. (2025) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.70058 · Cited by 4
Family Influence and Career Adaptability: The Mediating Role of Future Time Perspective
Andini, F. A., Josephine, A., & Riasnugrahani, M. (2025) · Personifikasi Jurnal Ilmu Psikologi · doi:10.21107/personifikasi.v16i1.25655 · Cited by 3
Beyond the Hoax Narratives: Understanding Climate Change Conspiracy Beliefs Through the Lens of the US–China Conflicts
Chan, H., & Tam, K. (2025) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.70015 · Cited by 3
The Human Dimensions of Coastal Adaptation Strategies
McGuire, C. J. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13020546 · Cited by 5
Reimagining the academic calendar for a changing climate: Modeled impact of shifting the fall term at the University of California
Matsunobu, L. M., & Coimbra, C. F. M. (2023) · Cleaner Environmental Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cesys.2023.100113 · Cited by 4
What Motivates Green Living? A Qualitative Investigation of Sustainable Life Choices
Weme, A. V., & Madsen, O. J. (2018) · Human Arenas · doi:10.1007/s42087-018-0023-9 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Connecting social and environmental policy in Australia: Collateral gains or collateral damage?
Marston, G., Stark, A., Matthews, T., & Baker, D. (2018) · Australian Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12339 · Cited by 4
The ancients knew it already: how Stoic philosophy explains the link between mindfulness, emotion regulation and pro-environmental behaviours ( Los antiguos ya lo sabían: cómo explica la filosofía estoica el vínculo entre mindfulness, regulación emocional y la conducta proambiental )
Fabjański, M., & Carrus, G. (2023) · PsyEcology Bilingual Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1080/21711976.2022.2149016 · Cited by 3
19 Population Psychology
Falbo, T. L., & Rodgers, J. L. (2019) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-10910-3_20 · Cited by 3
Active citizenship in green space governance
Mattijssen, T. (2018) · doi:10.18174/461163 · Cited by 3
Erratum to “The role of context in residential energy interventions: A meta review” [Renew Sustain Energy Rev 77 (2017) 1146–1168]
Šćepanović, S., Warnier, M., & Nurminen, J. K. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.033 · Cited by 3
Human dimensions of Predator Free 2050: A literature overview of social and behavioral researchPreprint
Nguyen, T., Balanovic, J., Aley, J. P., & Neff, M. B. (2022) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/f98m3 · Cited by 3
District Lahore's Primary School Students' Academic Performance and Teachers' Motivation: A Comparative Analysis
Kausar, F. N., Danish, M. S., & Abid, S. (2022) · PAKISTAN LANGUAGES AND HUMANITIES REVIEW · doi:10.47205/plhr.2022(6-iv)53 · Cited by 2
The Pernicious Effects of Uncertainty on Municipal Climate Action
Engelberg, D. L., Hudson, A., Freemark, Y. S., Moody, J., & Zhao, J. (2025) · Urban Affairs Review · doi:10.1177/10780874251340279 · Cited by 2
Mobilising climate action with moral appeals in a smartphone-based 8-week field experiment
Spaiser, V., & Nisbett, N. (2025) · npj Climate Action · doi:10.1038/s44168-025-00282-x · Cited by 2
The Impact of a Climate Crisis Class on Collective Action Participation
Alam, R., Aron, A. R., Waltzer, T., Nguyen, T., & Lyons, M. (2025) · Environmental Psychology Open · doi:10.69805/epo.v29.a32 · Cited by 2
Valuing the wider benefits of net zero: Conceptual foundations of new assessment frameworks in the United Kingdom
Lait, J., Foxon, T. J., McLachlan, C., & Sudmant, A. H. (2025) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104516 · Cited by 2
The Political Economy of the Clean Energy Transition
Gazmararian, A. F., & Tingley, D. H. (2026) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-040924-091929 · Cited by 2
One Health benefits of five European countries adopting 1.5 °C lifestyles
Scherer, L., Cap, S., Chiang, C., Rupcic, L., de Visser, S., & Franks, B. (2026) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2026.110252 · Cited by 2
Modeling complex associations between socio-demographic factors and climate policies using Conditional Inference Trees
Sun, Y., & Kejriwal, M. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-07994-3 · Cited by 2
Participatory Modelling for NBS Co-design and Implementation
Giordano, R., & Pagano, A. (2023) · Water security in a new world · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25308-9_5 · Cited by 2
Steering digital maturity: a design-based educational model for empowering digital creativity and future skills
Bruno, C., Canina, M., & Monestier, E. (2024) · Journal of Entrepreneurial Researchers · doi:10.29073/jer.v2i1.26 · Cited by 2
What about the children? The effectiveness of including children in environmental appeals
Wolf, L. J., Iosifyan, M., Foad, C. M. G., Haddock, G., & Maio, G. R. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102195 · Cited by 2
Promise Motivation: Films with Good News about Climate Change
von Mering, S. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Film Studies · doi:10.3138/cjfs-2023-0020 · Cited by 2
Plant Phenolics Compounds and Stress Management: A Review
Daphedar, A. B., Khan, S., Kakkalamel, S., & Taranath, T. C. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-3334-1_20 · Cited by 2
Integrating Framing Approaches as a Tool for Managing Complex Transitioning to Renewable Energy (TRE) Projects: The Yatir Wind Farm Case Study
Parush, D., & Shmueli, D. F. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16083164 · Cited by 3
Improvement of attitudes and skills using a MOOC about the basic science of climate change
Ferrari, E., Ballegeer, A.-M., Corrochano, D., Fuertes-Prieto, M. Á., Teijón, P. H., Delgado, L., Sánchez, S. A., & Ruíz, C. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03139-6 · Cited by 2
Property Rights, Fossil Fuel Imports, and Climate Change
Gibson, F. G. (2024) · Analyse & Kritik · doi:10.1515/auk-2024-2017 · Cited by 2
Future directions for early career researchers in planetary health equity
Arthur, M., Godziewski, C., Sievert, K., Boddington, S. J., Carrad, A., Marchiori, G. D. L., de Groot, B., Guzman, C. F., Frank, N., Gajurel, H., et al. (2025) · Earth System Governance · doi:10.1016/j.esg.2025.100245 · Cited by 2
Constructing Eco‐Responsible National Identities Through Collective Memory: Settler and Māori Histories of Environmental Change in Aotearoa New Zealand
Hellmann, O. (2025) · Nations and Nationalism · doi:10.1111/nana.13121 · Cited by 2
The political landscape of physical activity and climate action in Canada’s social climate
Lee, E., Park, S., Vanderloo, L. M., Ferguson, L. J., Latimer‐Cheung, A. E., O’Reilly, N., Rhodes, R. E., Spence, J. C., Tremblay, M. S., & Faulkner, G. (2025) · The Journal of Climate Change and Health · doi:10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100453 · Cited by 2
OBSOLETE: Denial Versus Reality of Climate Change
Jylhä, K. M. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-409548-9.09762-1 · Cited by 2
Motivation and climate change: A reviewPreprint
Brick, C., Bosshard, A., & Whitmarsh, L. E. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gcw9b · Cited by 2
Attentional and perceptual biases of climate changePreprint
Zhao, J., & Luo, Y. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/puytg · Cited by 2
How Does Environmental Concern Affect the Corporate Resilience? Evidence from China's Energy CompaniesPreprint
Deng, Y., Dong, K. Y., Zhang, X., & Hesary, F. T. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4471746 · Cited by 2
Emissions Reductions to Meet a Tighter Ozone Standard in the U.S. through Control Technologies versus Clean Energy Transition Scenarios
Meier, P., Holloway, T., Wu, X., & Orth, C. (2025) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5c01588 · Cited by 2
Evaluating the potential of zoos in reconnecting people with nature and conservation issues
Colléony, A. (2016) · doi:10.70675/8c6acb06zc395z4a02z9db5z13c00a0bf11f · Cited by 2
Influence of Personal Recommendations towards Electricity Consumption on Consumer Behavior
Héjjová, J., & Bućko, J. (2023) · International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics · doi:10.23919/mipro57284.2023.10159837 · Cited by 1
European Climate Policy and the Global Context
Pittel, K., Ringel, M., Rübbelke, D., Vögele, S., & Сіліна, І. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-84483-6_4 · Cited by 1
They reduce, we reduce: Perception of other countries’ climate effort predicts support for climate policies
Tam, K., Ohnuma, S., Fairbrother, M., & Chan, H. (2025) · PLOS Climate · doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000755 · Cited by 1
Intergenerational attitude–behavior linkages in household energy saving: Gender inequality perspective
Hu, B., Guan, W., Lin, J., & Geng, L. (2026) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.129518 · Cited by 1
Climate Emergency—Climate Action Planning and Delivery Recommendations
Kandzhova, A.-M., Šömen, I., Solomon, J. J., & Miraj, R. (2021) · Journal of Science Policy & Governance · doi:10.38126/jspg180205 · Cited by 1
The Null Impact of Parenthood on Technical Risk Preferences
Scheuch, E. G. (2025) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x251367040 · Cited by 1
Does Episodic Future Thinking Differ When Considering the Future of the Natural Environment? An Experimental Test
Milfont, T. L., Cuttance-Dunne, D. C., & Ellis, J. I. (2024) · New Zealand journal of psychology · doi:10.63146/001c.141654 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
‘Decision-support’ tools for the assessment of co-benefits: Insights from energy and climate policy in the United Kingdom
Lait, J., & Foxon, T. J. (2026) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115174 · Cited by 1
Understanding the Role of Climate Skepticism in Climate Change Adaptation: A Case Study of Western U.S. Ranchers
Hunt, L. G., Burnham, M., Wilmer, H., & Hillis, V. (2026) · Weather Climate and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-25-0132.1 · Cited by 1
Climate Change Messaging and Mental Health
Su, Z., Kaburu, F. M., Zhang, R., Kudiza, A., Tong, C., Intizar, M., Jiang, J., Yu, Y., Zhu, P., Yang, X. X., et al. (2026) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.70852 · Cited by 1
Threatened or Activated? Exploring Dual Mechanisms Underlying the Longitudinal Pro-Environmental Effect of Science Fiction Engagement
Wu, F., Ni, B., & Ma, Y. (2026) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2026.2642675 · Cited by 1
Impact of climate change mitigation policies on sustainable development performance in Ethiopia
Wang, F., Yang, W., Debel, M. T., & Challa, T. M. (2026) · Journal of Forest Economics · doi:10.1108/jfe-02-2025-0603 · Cited by 1
Beyond carbon sequestration: Swedish farmers' preferences and trade-offs between co-benefits of climate change mitigation measures
Opdenbosch, H., Mattsson, E., Oyinbo, O., Rommel, J., Hansson, H., & Manevska‐Tasevska, G. (2026) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109066 · Cited by 1
Empowering Youth for a Sustainable Future: Climate Change Awareness and Education in Higher Secondary Schools of Kerala, India
Sreepadi, S., & Jayarajan, K. (2026) · Journal of Geographical Sciences and Education · doi:10.69606/geography.v4i2.488 · Cited by 1
When Knowledge Backfires: The Impact of Environmental Awareness and Attitudes on Pro-Environmental Behavior through the New Ecological Paradigm
Suryani, H., & Ali, M. I. (2026) · Open Education Studies · doi:10.1515/edu-2025-0160 · Cited by 1
Policy, governance and institutions for reducing and managing losses and damages
OECD (2021) · OECD eBooks · doi:10.1787/9f70f54e-en · Cited by 1
World of Difference
(2017) · Amsterdam University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9789048534548 · Cited by 1
Smallholder farmers’ climate change cognition, adaptation practices and perceived adaptation efficacy in the Yangtze River Basin, China
He, R., Jin, J., Qiu, X., Zhang, C., & Peng, G. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2023.2269474 · Cited by 1
Soil Carbon: Pool, Loss, Emission and Climate Change Sources and Knowledge Level of Some Land Use Systems in Sudan Savanna, Kwara State
Owoade, F. M., ABOLARIN, A. O., & Kwara State Agricultural Development Project, M. O. A. A. R. D. (2024) · International Journal of Life Science and Agriculture Research · doi:10.55677/ijlsar/v03i3y2024-06 · Cited by 1
Psychologie positive
Baptiste, F., Kerjean-Ritter, M., Julien, R., Helme-Guizon, A., & Shankland, R. (2019) · In Press eBooks · doi:10.3917/pres.lanth.2019.01.0104 · Cited by 1
The Hidden Crises of Pollution Undermining Public Health
(2025) · doi:10.47278/book.hh/2025.493 · Cited by 1
A Champion, Any Champion: The Influence of Household Climate-Change and Energy-Efficiency Champions
Kleinschafer, J., Morrison, M., Dowell, D. J., & Kevin, P. (2026) · Journal of Sustainability Research · doi:10.20900/jsr20260055 · Cited by 1
Analysis of Ancillary Benefits of Climate Policy
Buchholz, W., Markandya, A., Rübbelke, D., & Vögele, S. (2019) · Springer climate · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30978-7_1 · Cited by 1
Ancillary Benefits of Adaptation: An Overview
de Murieta, E. S. (2019) · Springer climate · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30978-7_10 · Cited by 3
Private Ancillary Benefits in a Joint Production Framework
Schwirplies, C. (2019) · Springer climate · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30978-7_7 · Cited by 1
Fossil fuels
Mintz‐Woo, K. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315768090-32 · Cited by 1
Climate change impacts and their cascading effects: implications for losses and damages
OECD (2021) · OECD eBooks · doi:10.1787/f50ec22e-en · Cited by 1
How arts and cultural strategies can accelerate environmental progress
Hand, J., & Frasz, A. (2019) · doi:10.2737/nrs-gtr-p-185-paper21 · Cited by 1
From Parenthood to Planet Care? The Evolution of Environmental and Climate Concerns during Family FormationPreprint
Zoch, G., & Kapelle, N. (2023) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/n4xwf · Cited by 1
Etude des déterminants psychologiques de l'adaptation au changement climatique : effets de la distance psychologique, du risque perçu, et de l'attachement au lieu
Guillard, M. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/86fd78bfz1739z48e0zab3az7137ed69ca8e · Cited by 1
Grønn lykke En kvalitativ undersøkelse av bærekraftige livsvalg
Weme, A. V. (2016) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
Framing the impact of climate change on health: the case of New Zealand’s online media
Harrison, S. (2017) · Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago)
Saving energy when others pay the bill
Griffioen, A. M. (2018) · doi:10.18174/458231
Cities in the Context of Climate Change: Opportunities for Local Authorities in Climate Action in Africa
Agyemang-Bonsu, W. K., Lata, K., & Silva, V. (2019) · Advances in 21st century human settlements · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-3471-9_4
Ways of Learning, Ways of Knowing
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.005
Cultural Models of the Self and Environmentalism: A Cross-cultural and Experimental Investigation
Duff, H. (2020) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17147741.v1 · Cited by 1
Preface: Creativity, Collaboration, Confrontation
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.001
Do the Right Thing
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.004
Here and Now
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.002
The importance of moral framing in pro-environmental behaviour – a field studyPreprint
Vanags, P. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/whs2c
It’s Not You, It’s Me … Well It’s Actually Us
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.006
Academic Climate Advocacy and Activism
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.007
How We Know What We Know
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.003
Search for Meaning
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.009
Climat
Meldolesi, A. (2019) · Cerveau & Psycho · doi:10.3917/cerpsy.111.0064
General Index
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.012
Silver Buckshot
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.008
Name Index
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.011
References
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.010
Language, knowledge, power: The Discursive Construction of Climate Engineering Governance
Boettcher, M. (2022) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · doi:10.33540/1079
The Demand for Voluntary Carbon Sequestration – Experimental Evidence from a Reforestation Project in Germany
Bartels, L. E. (2020) · AEA Randomized Controlled Trials · doi:10.1257/rct.6319-1.0
Pro-environmental behavior as a signal of cooperativeness: Evidence from a social dilemma experiment (post-print)Preprint
Brick, C. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/f3esj
Gazing Into the Crystal Ball: Are Majority Groups Threatened by a Minority-Majority Future?
Lescelius, J. (2018) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17068244
Perceived Cultural Impacts of Climate Change Motivates Climate Action and Support for Climate PolicyPreprint
Tam, K., Leung, A. K. ‐., & Koh, B. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/6yh2f
CONTABILIZANDO CO-BENEFÍCIOS DO MECANISMO DE REDD+
TEIXEIRA, A. D. S. P. M. (2019) · doi:10.17771/pucrio.acad.52749
Executive summary
OECD (2021) · OECD eBooks · doi:10.1787/eac256d3-en
Preface
OECD (2021) · OECD eBooks · doi:10.1787/8fa34b8c-en
Foreword
OECD (2021) · OECD eBooks · doi:10.1787/f9803e68-en
Finance and financial risks in the face of growing losses and damages
OECD (2021) · OECD eBooks · doi:10.1787/ecc51c5a-en

Authors: Bain, P. G., Milfont, T. L., Kashima, Y., Bilewicz, M., Doron, G., Garðarsdóttir, R. B., Gouveia, V. V., Guan, Y., Johansson, L.-O., Pasquali, C., Corral-Verdugo, V., Aragones, J. I., Utsugi, A., Demarque, C., Otto, S., Park, J., Soland, M., Steg, L., González, R., Lebedeva, N., Madsen, O. J., Wagner, C., Akotia, C. S., Kurz, T., Saiz, J. L., Schultz, P. W., Einarsdóttir, G., & Saviolidis, N. M.
Affiliations: Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
The University of Melbourne (AU)
University of Warsaw (PL)
Reichman University (IL)
University of Iceland (IS)
Universidade Federal da Paraíba (BR)
University of Surrey (GB)
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Universidad Simón Bolívar (VE)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (FR)
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Nagoya University of Commerce and Business (JP)
University of Zurich (CH)
University of Groningen (NL)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
University of Oslo (NO)
University of Pretoria (ZA)
University of Ghana (GH)
University of Exeter (GB)
California State University, San Marcos (US)
Corresponding author: Bain, Paul G.
ORCID: Bain, Paul G.
Milfont, Taciano L.
Kashima, Yoshihisa
Bilewicz, Michał
Doron, Guy
Garðarsdóttir, Ragna B.
Gouveia, Valdiney V.
Guan, Yanjun
Johansson, Lars-Olof
Utsugi, Akira
Demarque, Christophe
Otto, Siegmar
Park, Joonha
Soland, Martin
Steg, Linda
González, Roberto
Lebedeva, Nadezhda
Madsen, Ole Jacob
Akotia, Charity S.
Kurz, Tim
Schultz, P. Wesley
Einarsdóttir, Gró
Venue: Nature Climate Change
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2015-09-28
Volume: 6
Issue: 2
Pages: 154-157
ISSN: 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
1758-6798
DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2814
OpenAlex: W2259778813
Semantic Scholar: e1a0851783048eb2d7dcb3003ed4c5f6cac87dec
Cited by: 447
References: 32
Citations by year: 2026: 31 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 5
FWCI: 85.15
Type: journal article
Language: en
Update notices: erratum (2016-04-27)
Open access: bronze
doi.org
Licence: www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
www.springer.com/tdm (vor)
Locations: Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
Pure (University of Bath) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
HAL AMU (submittedVersion)
Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
John Spoor Broome Library Institutional Repository (California State University) (submittedVersion)
LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Omeka S (Universidad de La Frontera) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion)
California State University ScholarWorks (system-wide DSpace) (submittedVersion)
Funders: Royal Society
Royal Society Te Apārangi (E1908)
Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki (IP2014 002273)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (5‐100)
Centro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión Social (15130009)
Australian Research Council (DP130102229, DP0984678)
Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias (# 15130009)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
Keywords: pro-environmental behavior, political ideology, economic development, climate change communication, gender and age differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks