Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Induction of resident memory T cells enhances the efficacy of cancer vaccine

Open access
Nizard, Mevyn, Roussel, Hélène, Diniz, Mariana O., Karaki, Soumaya, Tran, Thi, Voron, Thibault, Dransart, Estelle, Sandoval, Federico, Riquet, Marc, Rance, Bastien, Marcheteau, Elie, Fabre, Elizabeth, Mandavit, Marion, Terme, Magali, Blanc, Charlotte, Escudie, Jean-Baptiste, Gibault, Laure, Barthes, Françoise Le Pimpec, Granier, Clemence, Ferreira, Luis C. S., Badoual, Cecile, Johannes, Ludger, Tartour, Eric·2017·Nature Communications

Abstract

Tissue-resident memory T cells (Trm) represent a new subset of long-lived memory T cells that remain in tissue and do not recirculate. Although they are considered as early immune effectors in infectious diseases, their role in cancer immunosurveillance remains unknown. In a preclinical model of head and neck cancer, we show that intranasal vaccination with a mucosal vector, the B subunit of Shiga toxin, induces local Trm and inhibits tumour growth. As Trm do not recirculate, we demonstrate their crucial role in the efficacy of cancer vaccine with parabiosis experiments. Blockade of TFGβ decreases the induction of Trm after mucosal vaccine immunization, resulting in the lower efficacy of cancer vaccine. In order to extrapolate this role of Trm in humans, we show that the number of Trm correlates with a better overall survival in lung cancer in multivariate analysis. The induction of Trm may represent a new surrogate biomarker for the efficacy of cancer vaccine. This study also argues for the development of vaccine strategies designed to elicit them.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms15221

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Nizard, M., Roussel, H., Diniz, M. O., Karaki, S., Tran, T., Voron, T., Dransart, E., Sandoval, F., Riquet, M., Rance, B., Marcheteau, E., Fabre, E., Mandavit, M., Terme, M., Blanc, C., Escudie, J.-B., Gibault, L., Barthes, F. L. P., Granier, C., Ferreira, L. C. S., Badoual, C., Johannes, L., & Tartour, E.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2017-05-24
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
15221-15221
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2617387200
Cited by
308
References
44
FWCI
12.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Induction of resident memory T cells enhances the efficacy of cancer vaccine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ncomms15221
The paper
Nizard, M., Roussel, H., Diniz, M. O., Karaki, S., Tran, T., Voron, T., Dransart, E., Sandoval, F., Riquet, M., Rance, B., Marcheteau, E., Fabre, E., Mandavit, M., Terme, M., Blanc, C., Escudie, J.-B., Gibault, L., Barthes, F. L. P., Granier, C., . . . Tartour, E. (2017). Induction of resident memory T cells enhances the efficacy of cancer vaccine. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15221

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.