Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 336

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The ancestral flower of angiosperms and its early diversification

Open access
Sauquet, Hervé, von Balthazar, Maria, Magallón, Susana, Doyle, James A., Endress, Peter K., Bailes, Emily J., Barroso de Morais, Erica, Bull-Hereñu, Kester, Carrive, Laetitia, Chartier, Marion, Chomicki, Guillaume, Coiro, Mario, Cornette, Raphaël, El Ottra, Juliana H. L., Epicoco, Cyril, Foster, Charles S. P., Jabbour, Florian, Haevermans, Agathe, Haevermans, Thomas, Hernández, Rebeca, Little, Stefan A., Löfstrand, Stefan, Luna, Javier A., Massoni, Julien, Nadot, Sophie, Pamperl, Susanne, Prieu, Charlotte, Reyes, Elisabeth, dos Santos, Patrícia, Schoonderwoerd, Kristel M., Sontag, Susanne, Soulebeau, Anaëlle, Staedler, Yannick, Tschan, Georg F., Wing-Sze Leung, Amy, Schönenberger, Jürg·2017·Nature Communications
DOI 10.1038/ncomms16047
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recent advances in molecular phylogenetics and a series of important palaeobotanical discoveries have revolutionized our understanding of angiosperm diversification. Yet, the origin and early evolution of their most characteristic feature, the flower, remains poorly understood. In particular, the structure of the ancestral flower of all living angiosperms is still uncertain. Here we report model-based reconstructions for ancestral flowers at the deepest nodes in the phylogeny of angiosperms, using the largest data set of floral traits ever assembled. We reconstruct the ancestral angiosperm flower as bisexual and radially symmetric, with more than two whorls of three separate perianth organs each (undifferentiated tepals), more than two whorls of three separate stamens each, and more than five spirally arranged separate carpels. Although uncertainty remains for some of the characters, our reconstruction allows us to propose a new plausible scenario for the early diversification of flowers, leading to new testable hypotheses for future research on angiosperms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms16047

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 336

Metadata

Authors
Sauquet, H., von Balthazar, M., Magallón, S., Doyle, J. A., Endress, P. K., Bailes, E. J., Barroso de Morais, E., Bull-Hereñu, K., Carrive, L., Chartier, M., Chomicki, G., Coiro, M., Cornette, R., El Ottra, J. H. L., Epicoco, C., Foster, C. S. P., Jabbour, F., Haevermans, A., Haevermans, T., Hernández, R., Little, S. A., Löfstrand, S., Luna, J. A., Massoni, J., Nadot, S., Pamperl, S., Prieu, C., Reyes, E., dos Santos, P., Schoonderwoerd, K. M., Sontag, S., Soulebeau, A., Staedler, Y., Tschan, G. F., Wing-Sze Leung, A., & Schönenberger, J.
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-08-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
16047-16047
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/ncomms16047
OpenAlex
W2741748285
Cited by
336
References
58
FWCI
29.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.