Cited by 108Morphological variations and asymmetryAnimal Behavior and ReproductionGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Genetic architecture supports mosaic brain evolution and independent brain-body size regulation

Open access
Hager, Reinmar, Lu, Lu, Rosen, Glenn D., Williams, Robert W.·2012·Nature Communications

Abstract

The mammalian brain consists of distinct parts that fulfil different functions. Finlay and Darlington have argued that evolution of the mammalian brain is constrained by developmental programs, suggesting that different brain parts are not free to respond individually to selection and evolve independent of other parts or overall brain size. However, comparisons among mammals with matched brain weights often reveal greater differences in brain part size, arguing against strong developmental constraints. Here we test these hypotheses using a quantitative genetic approach involving over 10,000 mice. We identify independent loci for size variation in seven key parts of the brain, and observe that brain parts show low or no phenotypic correlation, as is predicted by a mosaic scenario. We also demonstrate that variation in brain size is independently regulated from body size. The allometric relations seen at higher phylogenetic levels are thus unlikely to be the product of strong developmental constraints.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms2086

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies point toward brain and body mass having independent genetic bases and different aspects of brain development evolving independently, suggesting selection can act on brain size and structure, or body mass, without causing correlated shifts in the other.

    “Recent studies point toward brain and body mass having independent genetic bases and different aspects of brain development evolving independently (Barton and Capellini 2011;Montgomery et al. 2011;Hager et al. 2012), suggesting selection can act on brain size and structure, or body mass, without causing correlated shifts in the other.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hager, R., Lu, L., Rosen, G. D., & Williams, R. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Hager, Reinmar
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2012-09-25
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
1079-1079
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122144141
Cited by
108
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11
FWCI
14.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/F013418/1)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U01AA013513, U01AA013499, U01 AA 13499, U24AA13513, U01AA014425, U01AA016662)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P20MH062009)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P20 DA 21131, P20DA021131)
  • National Eye Institute (P30EY013080)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA105417)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS052397, NS052397)
  • National Center for Research Resources (U24RR021760)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
brain evolution, developmental constraints, quantitative genetics, genetic loci, phenotypic correlation, mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Biological Evolution, Organ Size, Body Size, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review