CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum teleportation from a propagating photon to a solid-state spin qubit

Gao, W.B., Fallahi, P., Togan, E., Delteil, A., Chin, Y.S., Miguel-Sanchez, J., Imamoğlu, A.·2013·Nature Communications
DOI 10.1038/ncomms3744
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms3744

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2005 Jiang et al. reported a test of DFS against collective noise on polarization and phase with four two-qubit states from PDC.

    “More recently, in 2005 Jiang et al. reported a test of DFS against collective noise on polarization and phase with four two-qubit states again from PDC [386]”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [386]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Gao, W. B. et al. Teleportation-based realization of an optical quantum two-qubit entangling gate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 107, 20869–20874 (2010). · DOI
  2. Zhang, Q. et al. Experimental quantum teleportation of a two-qubit composite system. Nat. Phys. 2, 678–682 (2006). · DOI
  3. Yin, J. et al. Quantum teleportation and entanglement distribution over 100-kilometre free-space channels. Nature 488, 185–188 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Ma, X. S. et al. Quantum teleportation over 143 kilometres using active feed-forward. Nature 489, 269–273 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Olmschenk, A. et al. Quantum teleportation between distant matter qubits. Science 323, 486–489 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Barrett, M. D. et al. Deterministic quantum teleportation of atomic qubits. Nature 429, 737–739 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Riebe, M. et al. Deterministic quantum teleportation with atoms. Nature 429, 734–737 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Krauter, H. et al. Deterministic quantum teleportation between distant atomic objects. Nat. Phys. 9, 400–404 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Steffen, L. et al. Deterministic quantum teleportation with feed-forward in a solid state system. Nature 500, 319–322 (2013). · DOI
  10. Takeda, S., Mizuta, T., Fuwa, M., van Loock, P. & Furusawa, A. Deterministic quantum teleportation of photonic quantum bits by a hybrid technique. Nature 500, 315–318 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Sherson, J. F. et al. Quantum teleportation between light and matter. Nature 443, 557–560 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Chen, Yu.-Ao. et al. Memory-built-in quantum teleportation with photonic and atomic qubits. Nat. Phys. 4, 103–107 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Saglamyurek, E. et al. Broadband waveguide quantum memory for entangled photons. Nature 469, 512–515 (2011). · DOI
  14. Clausen, C. et al. Quantum storage of photonic entanglement in a crystal. Nature 469, 508–511 (2011). · DOI
  15. Boozer, A. D., Boca, A., Miller, R., Northup, T. E. & Kimble, H. J. Reversible state transfer between light and a single trapped atom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 193601 (2007). · DOI
  16. Nolleke, C. et al. Efficient teleportation between remote single-atom quantum memories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 140403 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  17. DiVincenzo, D. P. The physical implementation of quantum computation. Fortschr. Phys. 48, 771–783 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Michler, P. et al. A quantum dot single-photon turnstile device. Science 22, 2282–2285 (2000). · DOI
  19. Claudon, J. et al. A highly efficient single-photon source based on a quantum dot in a photonic nanowire. Nat. Photon. 4, 174–177 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Gazzano, O. et al. Bright solid-state sources of indistinguishable single photons. Nat. Commun 4, 1425 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kroutvar, M. et al. Optically programmable electron spin memory using semiconductor quantum dots. Nature 432, 81–84 (2004). · DOI
  22. Petta, J. R. et al. Coherent manipulation of coupled electron spins in semiconductor quantum dots. Science 309, 2180–2184 (2005). · DOI
  23. Press, D., Ladd, T. D., Zhang, B. & Yamamoto, Y. Complete quantum control of a single quantum dot spin using ultrafast optical pulses. Nature 456, 218–221 (2008). · DOI
  24. Greilich, A. et al. Ultrafast optical rotations of electron spins in quantum dots. Nat. Phys. 5, 262–266 (2009). · DOI
  25. Gao, W. B., Fallahi, P., Togan, E., Miguel-Sanchez, J. & Imamoğlu, A. Observation of entanglement between a quantum dot spin and a single photon. Nature 491, 426–430 (2012). · DOI
  26. De Greve, K. et al. Quantum-dot spin-photon entanglement via frequency downconversion to telecom wavelength. Nature 491, 421–425 (2012). · DOI
  27. Schaibley, J. R. et al. Demonstration of quantum entanglement between a single electron spin confined to an InAs quantum dot and a photon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 167401 (2013). · DOI
  28. Patel, R. B. et al. Two-photon interference of the emission from electrically tunable remote quantum dots. Nature Photonics 4, 632–635 (2010). · DOI
  29. Flagg, E. B. et al. Interference of single photons from two separate semiconductor quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 137401 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Legero, T., Wilk, T., Hennrich, M., Rempe, G. & Kuhn, A. Quantum beat of two single photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 070503 (2004). · DOI
  31. Press, D. et al. Ultrafast optical spin echo in a single quantum dot. Nat. Photon 4, 367–370 (2010). · DOI
  32. Urbaszek, B. et al. Nuclear spin physics in quantum dots: an optical investigation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 79–133 (2013). · DOI
  33. Derka., R., Buzek., V. & Ekert, A. K. Universal algorithm for optimal estimation of quantum states from finite ensembles via realizable generalized measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1571–1575 (1998). · DOI
  34. Massar, S. & Popescu, S. Optimal extraction of information from finite quantum ensembles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1259–1263 (1995). · DOI
  35. Moehring, D. L. et al. Entanglement of single-atom quantum bits at a distance. Nature 449, 68–71 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  36. Bernien, H. et al. Heralded entanglement between solid-state qubits separated by three metres. Nature 497, 86–90 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  37. Weiss, K. M., Elzerman, J. M., Delley, Y. L., Miguel-Sanchez, J. & Imamoğlu, A. Coherent two-electron spin qubits in an optically active pair of coupled InGaAs quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 107401 (2012). · DOI
  38. Brunner, D. et al. A coherent single-hole spin in a semiconductor. Science 325, 70–72 (2009). · DOI
  39. Bluhm, H. et al. Dephasing time of GaAs electron-spin qubits coupled to a nuclear bath exceeding 200 μs. Nat. Phys. 7, 109–113 (2010). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gao, W. B., Fallahi, P., Togan, E., Delteil, A., Chin, Y. S., Miguel-Sanchez, J., & Imamoğlu, A.
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2013-11-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
ISSN
2041-1723
DOI
10.1038/ncomms3744
Cited by
164
References
9
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review