The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient Teleportation Between Remote Single-Atom Quantum Memories
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two methods can be adopted to circumvent noisy channels: increasing resilience to losses and noise with two-way classical communications, or decreasing their influence by encoding information in decoherence-free subspaces.
“Two methods can be adopted to circumvent the issue of noisy channels: to increase the resilience of a protocol to losses and noise [380][381][382] (two-way classical communications), or to decrease their influence by encoding information in immune states (decoherence-free subspaces, DFS), for both quantum computation [383] and quantum communication tasks [384].”
From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [381]
The Abstract describes teleportation as an alternative to direct transfer over lossy channels, and the Efficiency of the protocol section says successful transfers are heralded. This supports the loss-resilience part of the cited clause, but our copy does not establish the claimed use of two-way classical communication or general resilience to channel noise. The DFS clause is cited to other sources, not this paper. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1895 · Cited by 13,703
Kimble, H. J. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07127 · Cited by 6,023
Experimental quantum teleportation
Bouwmeester, D., Pan, J.-W., Mattle, K., Eibl, M., Weinfurter, H., & Zeilinger, A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/37539 · Cited by 5,545
Quantum Repeaters: The Role of Imperfect Local Operations in Quantum Communication
Briegel, H.-J., Dür, W., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5932 · Cited by 3,481
Boschi, D., Branca, S., De Martini, F., Hardy, L., & Popescu, S. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.1121 · Cited by 1,777
An elementary quantum network of single atoms in optical cavities
Ritter, S., Nölleke, C., Hahn, C., Reiserer, A., Neuzner, A., Uphoff, M., Mücke, M., Figueroa, E., Bochmann, J., & Rempe, G. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11023 · Cited by 894
Self-citationDeterministic Single-Photon Source for Distributed Quantum Networking
Kuhn, A., Hennrich, M., & Rempe, G. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.067901 · Cited by 859
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 10.1038/35106500 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.282.5389.706 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature11332 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature11472 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature02570 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature02608 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1167209 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1143835 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.030501 · DOI
- 10.1209/0295-5075/25/8/001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.51.R1727 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature09997 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s003400000484 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.070503 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphoton.2010.161 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.123605 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.043604 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.143601 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.060502 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature06118 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1221856 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.50.R4441 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.167903 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.203601 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.203602 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1207329109 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Photonic quantum information processing: a review
Flamini, F., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aad5b2 · Cited by 770
Modular entanglement of atomic qubits using photons and phonons
Hucul, D., Inlek, I. V., Vittorini, G., Crocker, C., Debnath, S., Clark, S. M., & Monroe, C. (2015) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3150 · Cited by 311
Entanglement of distinguishable quantum memories
Vittorini, G., Hucul, D., Inlek, I. V., Crocker, C., & Monroe, C. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.040302 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Nölleke, C., Neuzner, A., Reiserer, A., Hahn, C., Rempe, G., & Ritter, S.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2013-04-02
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 14
- ISSN
- 0031-9007
- 1079-7114
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 8
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
