Cited by 585

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum teleportation over 143 kilometres using active feed-forward

Ma, Xiao-Song, Herbst, Thomas, Scheidl, Thomas, Wang, Daqing, Kropatschek, Sebastian, Naylor, William, Wittmann, Bernhard, Mech, Alexandra, Kofler, Johannes, Anisimova, Elena, Makarov, Vadim, Jennewein, Thomas, Ursin, Rupert, Zeilinger, Anton·2012·Nature

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature11472

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Single-photon qubits have been teleported on atomic ensembles such as Caesium atoms, 87Rb atoms, a pair of trapped calcium ions, or diamond.

    “Single-photon qubits have been teleported on atomic ensembles [363,364] such as Caesium atoms [365] or 87 Rb atoms [366][367][368], on a pair of trapped calcium ions [369] or diamond [370].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [363]

    The Experiment section describes teleporting a single-photon state across a 143 km free-space optical link. It does not report teleportation onto caesium or rubidium atoms, trapped calcium ions, or diamond; the receiving system uses another photon. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Gisin, N. & Thew, R. Quantum communication. Nature Photon. 1, 165–171 (2007) · DOI
  2. Furusawa, A. et al. Unconditional quantum teleportation. Science 282, 706–709 (1998) · DOI · Paper page
  3. Massar, S. & Popescu, S. Optimal extraction of information from finite quantum ensembles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1259–1263 (1995) · DOI
  4. Hughes, R. J. et al. Free-space quantum key distribution in daylight. J. Mod. Opt. 47, 549–562 (2000) · DOI
  5. Rarity, J. G., Tapster, P. R., Gorman P. M & Knight, P. Ground to satellite secure key exchange using quantum cryptography. N. J. Phys. 4, 82 (2002) · DOI · Paper page
  6. Aspelmeyer, M. et al. Long-distance free-space distribution of quantum entanglement. Science 301, 621–623 (2003) · DOI
  7. Marcikic, I., Lamas-Linares, A. & Kurtsiefer, C. Free-space quantum key distribution with entangled photons. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 101122 (2006) · DOI
  8. Ursin, R. et al. Entanglement-based quantum communication over 144 km. Nature Phys. 3, 481–486 (2007) · DOI · Paper page
  9. Villoresi, P. et al. Experimental verification of the feasibility of a quantum channel between space and Earth. N. J. Phys. 10, 033038 (2008) · DOI
  10. Scheidl, T. et al. Feasibility of 300 km quantum key distribution with entangled states. N. J. Phys. 11, 085002 (2009) · DOI
  11. Jin, X.-M. et al. Experimental free-space quantum teleportation. Nature Photon. 4, 376–381 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
  12. Scheidl, T. et al. Violation of local realism with freedom of choice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19708–19713 (2010) · DOI
  13. Marcikic, I., de Riedmatten, H., Tittel, W., Zbinden, H. & Gisin, N. Long-distance teleportation of qubits at telecommunication wavelengths. Nature 421, 509–513 (2003) · DOI · Paper page
  14. Ursin, R. et al. Quantum teleportation across the Danube. Nature 430, 849 (2004) · DOI · Paper page
  15. Calsamiglia, J. & Lütkenhaus, N. Maximum efficiency of a linear-optical Bell-state analyzer. Appl. Phys. B 72, 67–71 (2001) · DOI · Paper page
  16. Kim, Y.-H., Kulik, S. P., Chekhova, M. V., Grice, W. P. & Shih, Y. Experimental entanglement concentration and universal Bell-state synthesizer. Phys. Rev. A 67, 010301(R) (2003) · DOI
  17. Poh, H. S., Lim, J., Marcikic, I., Lamas-Linares, A. & Kurtsiefer, C. Eliminating spectral distinguishability in ultrafast spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. A 80, 043815 (2009) · DOI
  18. Yao, X.-C. et al. Observation of eight-photon entanglement. Nature Photon. 6, 225–228 (2012) · DOI · Paper page
  19. Kim, Y.-S., Jeong, Y.-C., Sauge, S., Makarov, V. & Kim, Y.-H. Ultra-low noise single-photon detector based on Si avalanche photodiode. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 093110 (2011) · DOI
  20. Aspelmeyer, M., Jennewein, T., Pfennigbauer, M., Leeb, W. R. & Zeilinger, A. Long-distance quantum communication with entangled photons using satellites. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 9, 1541–1551 (2003) · DOI
  21. Yin, J. et al. Quantum teleportation and entanglement distribution over 100-kilometre free-space channels. Nature 488, 185–188 (2012) · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ma, X.-S., Herbst, T., Scheidl, T., Wang, D., Kropatschek, S., Naylor, W., Wittmann, B., Mech, A., Kofler, J., Anisimova, E., Makarov, V., Jennewein, T., Ursin, R., & Zeilinger, A.
Venue
Nature
Published
2012-09
Volume
489
Issue
7415
Pages
269-273
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
Cited by
585
References
14
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review