CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 155

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental demonstration of graph-state quantum secret sharing

Bell, B. A., Markham, D., Herrera-Martí, D. A., Marin, A., Wadsworth, W. J., Rarity, J. G., Tame, M. S.·2014·Nature Communications
DOI 10.1038/ncomms6480
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms6480

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Aharonov, D., Ta-Shma, A., Vazirani, U. & Yao, A. Quantum bit escrow. In STOC 2000, The 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing 705–714ACM (2000). · DOI
  2. Spekkens, R. & Rudolph, T. Quantum protocol for cheat-sensitive weak coin flipping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 227901 (2002). · DOI
  3. Colbeck, R. An entanglement-based protocol for strong coin tossing with bias 1/4. Phys. Lett. A 362, 390–392 (2007). · DOI
  4. Chailloux, A. & Kerenidis, I. in Proc. of the 50th Annual Symp. on Found. of Comp. Sci., FOCS 2009, 25–27 October 2009 IEEE Computer Society (2009).
  5. Broadbent, A., Fitzsimons, J. & Kashefi, E. Universal blind quantum computation. Proc. 50th Annual IEEE Symp. Found. Comp. Sci. 517–526 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Buhrman, H. & Rohrig, H. Distributed quantum computing. Lect. Notes Comp. Sci. 2747, 1–20 (2003). · DOI
  7. Ben-Or, M., Crépeau, C., Gottesman, D., Hassidim, A. & Smith, A. Secure Multiparty Quantum Computation with (Only) a Strict Honest Majority. Proc. 47th Annual IEEE Symp. on the Found. of Comp. Sci. (FOCS '06) 249–260IEEE Press (2006). · DOI
  8. Hillery, M., Bužek, V. & Berthiaume, A. Quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. A 59, 1829–1834 (1999). · DOI
  9. Blakley, G. R. Safeguarding cryptographic keys. Proc. Natl Comp. Conf. 48, 313–317 (1979).
  10. Markham, D. & Sanders, B. C. Graph states for quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. A 78, 042309 (2008). · DOI
  11. Keet, A., Fortescue, B., Markham, D. & Sanders, B. C. Quantum secret sharing with qudit graph states. Phys. Rev. A 82, 062315 (2010). · DOI
  12. Hein, M. et al. Entanglement in Graph States and its Applications. Proc. of the Internat. School of Phy. "Enrico Fermi" on "Quantum Computers, Algorithms and Chaos", Varenna, Italy, July (IOS Press, (2005).
  13. Barreiro, J. T., Langford, N. K., Peters, N. A. & Kwiat, P. G. Generation of hyperentangled photon pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 260501 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Vallone, G., Pomarico, E., Mataloni, P., De Martini, F. & Berardi, V. Realization and characterization of a two-photon four-qubit linear cluster state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 180502 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Ceccarelli, R., Vallone, G., De Martini, F., Mataloni, P. & Cabello, A. Experimental entanglement and nonlocality of a two-photon six-qubit cluster state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 160401 (2009). · DOI
  16. Raussendorf, R. & Briegel, H. J. A one-way quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188–5191 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kashefi, E. & Danos, V. Determinism in the one-way model. Phys. Rev. A. 74, 052310 (2006). · DOI
  18. Browne, D. E., Kashefi, E., Mhalla, M. & Perdrix, S. Generalized flow and determinism in measurement-based quantum computation. New J. Phys. 9, 250 (2007). · DOI
  19. Mhalla, M., Murao, M., Perdrix, S., Someya, M. & Turner, P. S. Proc. of TQC 2011, Madrid, Spain Vol. 6745174–187LNCS (2014).
  20. Gottesman, D. Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology (1997).
  21. Schlingemann, D. Stabilizer codes can be realized as graph codes. Quant. Inf. Comp. 2, 307–323 (2002).
  22. Schlingemann, D. Logical network implementation for graph codes and cluster states. Quant. Inf. Comp. 3, 431–449 (2003).
  23. Aliferis, P. & Leung, D. W. Simple proof of fault tolerance in the graph-state model. Phys. Rev. A 73, 032308 (2006). · DOI
  24. Dawson, C. M., Haselgrove, H. L. & Nielsen, M. A. Noise thresholds for optical quantum computers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 020501 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  25. Silva, M., Danos, V., Kashefi, E. & Ollivier, H. A direct approach to fault-tolerance in measurement-based quantum computation via teleportation. New J. Phys. 9, 192 (2007). · DOI
  26. Bell, B. A. et al. Experimental demonstration of a graph state quantum error-correction code. Nat. Commun. 5, 3658 (2014). · DOI
  27. Marin, A. & Markham, D. On the equivalence between sharing quantum and classical secrets, and error correction. Phys. Rev. A 88, 042332 (2013). · DOI
  28. Bell, B. et al. Experimental characterization of photonic fusion using fiber sources. New J. Phys. 14, 023021 (2012). · DOI
  29. Tóth, G. & Gühne, O. Detecting genuine multipartite entanglement with two local measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 060501 (2005). · DOI
  30. Tittel, W., Zbinden, H. & Gisin, N. Experimental demonstration of quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. A 63, 042301 (2001). · DOI
  31. Schmid, C. h. et al. Experimental quantum secret sharing. Fortschr. Phys. 54, 831–839 (2006). · DOI
  32. Schmid, C. et al. Experimental single qubit quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 230505 (2005). · DOI
  33. Chen, Y.-A. et al. Experimental quantum secret sharing and third-man quantum cryptography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 200502 (2005). · DOI
  34. Bogdanski, J., Rafiei, N. & Bourennane, M. Experimental quantum secret sharing using telecommunication fiber. Phys. Rev. A 78, 062307 (2008). · DOI
  35. Marin, A. & Markham, D. Quantum secret sharing over untrusted quantum channels. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.0556 (2014). · arXiv
  36. Reiserer, A., Ritter, S. & Rempe, G. Nondestructive detection of an optical photon. Science 342, 1349–1351 (2013). · DOI
  37. Broadbent, A., Chouha, P. R. & Tapp, A. in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Quantum, Nano and Micro Technologies (ICQNM 2009)59–62 (2009). · DOI
  38. Javelle, J., Mhalla, M. & Perdrix, S. New protocols and lower bound for quantum secret sharing with graph states. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.1487 (2011). · arXiv
  39. Marin, A., Markham, D. & Perdrix, S. Access structure in graphs in high dimension and application to secret sharing. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.7105 (2013). · arXiv
  40. Pappa, A., Chailloux, A., Wehner, S., Diamanti, E. & Kerenidis, I. Multipartite entanglement verification resistant against dishonest parties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 260502 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  41. Tyc, T. & Sanders, B. C. How to share a continuous-variable quantum secret by optical interferometry. Phys. Rev. A 65, 042310 (2002). · DOI
  42. Tyc, T., Rowe, D. J. & Sanders, B. C. Efficient sharing of a continuous-variable quantum secret. J. Phys A: Math. Gen. 36, 7625 (2003). · DOI
  43. Lance, A. M. et al. Continuous variable (2, 3) threshold quantum secret sharing schemes. New J. Phys. 5, 4 (2003). · DOI
  44. Lance, A. M., Symul, T., Bowen, W., Sanders, B. C. & Lam, P. K. Tripartite quantum state sharing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 177903 (2004). · DOI
  45. Lance, A. M. et al. Continuous-variable quantum-state sharing via quantum disentanglement. Phys. Rev. A 71, 033814 (2005). · DOI
  46. Halder, M. et al. Nonclassical 2-photon interference with separate intrinsically narrowband fibre sources. Opt. Express 17, 4670–4676 (2009). · DOI
  47. Clark, A. et al. Intrinsically narrowband pair photon generation in microstructured fibres. New J. Phys. 13, 065009 (2011). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bell, B. A., Markham, D., Herrera-Martí, D. A., Marin, A., Wadsworth, W. J., Rarity, J. G., & Tame, M. S.
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-11-21
Volume
5
Issue
1
ISSN
2041-1723
DOI
10.1038/ncomms6480
Cited by
155
References
11
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review