Cited by 511

Canalization of development by microRNAs

Hornstein, Eran, Shomron, Noam·2006·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Animal development is an extremely robust process resulting in stereotyped outcomes. Canalization is a design principle wherein developmental pathways are stabilized to increase phenotypic reproducibility. Recent revelations into microRNA (miRNA) function suggest that miRNAs act as key players in canalizing genetic programs. We suggest that miRNA interactions with the network of protein-coding genes evolved to buffer stochastic perturbations and thereby confer robustness to developmental genetic programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng1803

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The miRNAs in the second class may serve as buffers to silence genetic noise of unwanted transcripts arising from 'leaky' transcription, and such a role has been attributed to miR-9.

    “The miRNAs in the second class may serve as buffers to silence the genetic noise of unwanted transcripts arising from “leaky” transcription (Hornstein and Shomron, 2006) and such a role has been attributed to miR-9 (Li et al., 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hornstein, E., & Shomron, N.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2006-05-30
Volume
38
Issue
S6
Pages
S20-S24
ISSN
  • 1061-4036
  • 1546-1718
Cited by
511
References
10
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review