Cited by 2Gene Regulatory Network Analysisstochastic dynamics and bifurcationStochastic processes and statistical mechanics

Exact distributions of threshold crossing times of proteins under post-transcriptional regulation by small RNAs

Open access
Ali, Syed Yunus, Prasad, Ashok, Das, Dibyendu·2025·Physical Review E

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The timings of several cellular events like cell lysis, cell division, or pore formation in endosomes are regulated by the time taken for the relevant proteins to cross a threshold in number or concentration. Since protein synthesis is stochastic, the threshold crossing time is a first passage problem. The exact distributions of these first passage processes have been obtained recently for unregulated and autoregulated genes. Many proteins are however regulated by post-transcriptional regulation, controlled by small noncoding RNAs (sRNAs). Certain mathematical models of gene expression with post-transcriptional sRNA regulation have been recently exactly mapped to models without sRNA regulation. Utilizing this mapping and the exact distributions, we calculate exact results on fluctuations (full distribution, all cumulants, and characteristic times) of protein threshold crossing times in the presence of sRNA regulation. We derive two interesting predictions from these exact results. We show that the size of the fluctuation of the threshold crossing times have a nonmonotonic U-shaped behavior as a function of the rates of binding and unbinding of the sRNA-mRNA complex. Thus there are optimal parameters that minimize noise. Furthermore, the fluctuations in models with sRNA regulation may be higher or lower compared to the model without regulation, depending on the mean protein burst size.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreve.111.014405

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ali, S. Y., Prasad, A., & Das, D.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
  • Colorado State University (US)
Corresponding author
Ali, Syed Yunus
Venue
Physical Review E
Published
2025-01-03
Volume
111
Issue
1
Pages
014405-014405
ISSN
  • 2470-0045 (ISSN-L)
  • 2470-0053
OpenAlex
W4406048984
Cited by
2
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. E (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
Keywords
first passage time, post-transcriptional regulation, small RNA, stochastic gene expression, protein fluctuations, exact distribution, noise minimization
MeSH terms
Gene Expression Regulation, Models, Biological, Models, Genetic, Proteins, RNA Processing, Post-Transcriptional, RNA, Messenger, Stochastic Processes, Time Factors, RNA, Small Untranslated

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review