Cited by 384Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Rapid mass spectrometric conversion of tissue biopsy samples into permanent quantitative digital proteome maps

Open access
Guo, Tiannan, Kouvonen, Petri, Koh, Ching Chiek, Gillet, Ludovic C, Wolski, Witold E, Röst, Hannes L, Rosenberger, George, Collins, Ben C +5 more·2015·Nature Medicine

Abstract

Clinical specimens are each inherently unique, limited and nonrenewable. Small samples such as tissue biopsies are often completely consumed after a limited number of analyses. Here we present a method that enables fast and reproducible conversion of a small amount of tissue (approximating the quantity obtained by a biopsy) into a single, permanent digital file representing the mass spectrometry (MS)-measurable proteome of the sample. The method combines pressure cycling technology (PCT) and sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra (SWATH)-MS. The resulting proteome maps can be analyzed, re-analyzed, compared and mined in silico to detect and quantify specific proteins across multiple samples. We used this method to process and convert 18 biopsy samples from nine patients with renal cell carcinoma into SWATH-MS fragment ion maps. From these proteome maps we detected and quantified more than 2,000 proteins with a high degree of reproducibility across all samples. The measured proteins clearly distinguished tumorous kidney tissues from healthy tissues and differentiated distinct histomorphological kidney cancer subtypes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nm.3807

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SWATH-MS and related DIA approaches have achieved high intra-laboratory reproducibility in a variety of research questions.

    “SWATH-MS and related DIA approaches have achieved a high degree of reproducibility in intra-laboratory studies in a variety of research questions such as interaction proteomics40, 41, plasma proteomics42, tissue proteomics43, microbial proteomics44, 45, pre-clinical toxicology9, analysis of genetic reference strains46, and many others.”
  • The result of this study, focused on assessing variation in data acquisition, is paralleled by concurrent improvements in robustness of data analysis tools, methods for error rate control, and sample preparation techniques.

    “The result of our study, focused on assessing variation in data acquisition, is paralleled by concurrent improvements in the robustness of data analysis tools39, methods for error rate control55, and sample preparation techniques43.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, T., Kouvonen, P., Koh, C. C., Gillet, L. C., Wolski, W. E., Röst, H. L., Rosenberger, G., Collins, B. C., Blum, L. C., Gillessen, S., Joerger, M., Jochum, W., & Aebersold, R.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Åbo Akademi University (FI)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Kantonsspital St. Gallen (CH)
Corresponding author
Aebersold, Ruedi
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2015-03-02
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
407-413
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W2033047611
Cited by
376
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 19
FWCI
18.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (107679, 3100A0)
  • Suomen Kulttuurirahasto
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
tissue biopsy, proteome mapping, SWATH-MS, renal cell carcinoma, protein quantification
MeSH terms
Biopsy, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Humans, Ions, Kidney, Kidney Neoplasms, Peptides, Pressure, Mass Spectrometry, Reproducibility of Results, Proteome, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review