CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,023

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interfacial heat flow in carbon nanotube suspensions

Huxtable, Scott T., Cahill, David G., Shenogin, Sergei, Xue, Liping, Ozisik, Rahmi, Barone, Paul, Usrey, Monica, Strano, Michael S., Siddons, Giles, Shim, Moonsub, Keblinski, Pawel·2003·Nature Materials
DOI 10.1038/nmat996
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The enormous amount of basic research into carbon nanotubes has sparked interest in the potential applications of these novel materials. One promising use of carbon nanotubes is as fillers in a composite material to improve mechanical behaviour, electrical transport and thermal transport. For composite materials with high thermal conductivity, the thermal conductance across the nanotube-matrix interface is of particular interest. Here we use picosecond transient absorption to measure the interface thermal conductance (G) of carbon nanotubes suspended in surfactant micelles in water. Classical molecular dynamics simulations of heat transfer from a carbon nanotube to a model hydrocarbon liquid are in agreement with experiment. Our findings indicate that heat transport in a nanotube composite material will be limited by the exceptionally small interface thermal conductance (G approximately 12 MW m(-2) K(-1)) and that the thermal conductivity of the composite will be much lower than the value estimated from the intrinsic thermal conductivity of the nanotubes and their volume fraction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmat996

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TDTR technique is implemented extensively to study thermal transport mechanisms across interfaces, including surface chemistry effects on interfacial thermal conductance across functionalized liquid-solid and solid-solid interfaces, interfacial thermal conductance between metals and dielectrics, and interface between low dimensional materials and bulk substrates.

    “TDTR technique is therefore implemented extensively to study the thermal transport mechanisms across interfaces, including the effect of surface chemistry on interfacial thermal conductance across functionalized liquid-solid boundary[95,117,118] and solid-solid interfaces[119], interfacial thermal conductance between metals and dielectrics,[120][121][122][123][124] and interface between low dim”

    From Measurement Techniques for Thermal Conductivity and Interfacial Thermal Conductance of Bulk and Thin Film Materials (2016) · cites this paper as [124]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Ajayan, P.M., Schadler, L.S., Giannaris, C. & Rubio, A. Single-walled carbon nanotube-polymer composites: Strength and weakness. Adv. Mater. 12, 750–753 (2000). · DOI
  2. Allaoui, A., Bai, S., Cheng, H.M. & Bai, J.B. Mechanical and electrical properties of a MWNT/epoxy composite. Composites Sci.Technol. 62, 1993–1998 (2002). · DOI
  3. Kilbride, B.E. et al. Experimental observation of scaling laws for alternating current and direct current conductivity in polymer–carbon nanotube composite thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 92, 4024–4030 (2002). · DOI
  4. Benoit, J.-M., Corraze, B., Lefrant, S., Bernier, P. & Chauvet, O. Electric transport properties and percolation in carbon nanotubes/PMMA composites. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 706, Z3.28.1–Z3.28.5 (2002). · DOI
  5. Choi, S.U.S., Zhang, Z.G., Yu, W., Lockwood, F.E. & Grulke, E.A. Anomalous thermal conductivity enhancement in nanotube suspensions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 2252–2254 (2001). · DOI
  6. Biercuk, M.J. et al. Carbon nanotube composites for thermal management. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 2767–2769 (2002). · DOI
  7. Berber, S., Kwon, Y.-K. & Tománek, D. Unusually high thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4613–4616 (2000). · DOI
  8. Nan, C.W., Birringer, R., Clarke, D.R. & Gleiter, H. Effective thermal conductivity of particulate composite with interfacial thermal resistance. J. Appl. Phys. 81, 6692–6699 (1997). · DOI
  9. Swartz, E.T. & Pohl, R.O. Thermal boundary resistance. Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 605–668 (1989). · DOI
  10. Cahill, D.G., Goodson, K. & Majumdar, A. Thermometry and thermal transport in micro/nanoscale solid-state devices and structures. J. Heat Transfer 124, 223–241 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Wilson, O.M., Hu, X., Cahill, D.G. & Braun, P.V. Colloidal metal particles as probes of nanoscale thermal transport in fluids. Phys. Rev. B 66, 224301-1–224301-6 (2002). · DOI
  12. Bachilo, S.M. et al. Structure-assigned optical spectra of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Science 298, 2361–2366 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Strano, M.S. Assignment of (n,m) Raman and optical features of metallic single walled carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. (in the press).
  14. Lauret, J.S. et al. Ultrafast carrier dynamics in single-wall carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 057404-1–05704-4 (2003). · DOI
  15. O'Connell, M.J. et al. Band gap fluorescence from individual single-walled carbon nanotubes. Science 297, 593–596 (2002). · DOI
  16. Touloukian, Y.S. Thermophysical Properties of Matter (IFI/Plenum, New York, 1979).
  17. Strano, M.S. et al. The role of surfactant adsorption during ultrasonication in the dispersion of single-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Nanosci. Nanotech. 3, 81–86 (2003). · DOI
  18. Strano, M.S. et al. Reversible, band-gap selective protonation of single walled carbon nanotubes in solution. J. Phys. Chem. (in the press).
  19. Richard, C., Balavoine, F., Schultz, P., Ebbesen, T.W. & Mioskowski, C. Supramolecular self-assembly of lipid derivatives on carbon nanotubes. Science 300, 775–778 (2003). · DOI
  20. Hone, J., Batlogg, B., Benes, Z., Johnson, A.T. & Fischer, J.E. Quantized phonon spectrum of single-wall carbon nanotubes. Science 289, 1730–1733 (2000). · DOI
  21. Bronikowski, M.J., Willis, P.A., Colbert, D.T., Smith, K.A. & Smalley, R.E. Gas-phase production of carbon single-walled nanotubes from carbon monoxide via the HiPco process: A parametric study. J. Vacuum Sci. Technol. A 19, 1800–1805 (2001). · DOI
  22. Sun, H., Mumby, S.J., Maple, J.R. & Hagler, A.T. An ab initio CFF93 all-atom force field for polycarbonates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 2978–2987 (1994). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Huxtable, S. T., Cahill, D. G., Shenogin, S., Xue, L., Ozisik, R., Barone, P., Usrey, M., Strano, M. S., Siddons, G., Shim, M., & Keblinski, P.
Venue
Nature Materials
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2003-10-12
Volume
2
Issue
11
Pages
731-734
ISSN
  • 1476-1122
  • 1476-4660
DOI
10.1038/nmat996
Cited by
1,023
References
3
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review