The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microfluidic control of cell pairing and fusion
Open accessAbstract
Cell fusion has been used for many different purposes, including generation of hybridomas and reprogramming of somatic cells. The fusion step is the key event in initiation of these procedures. Standard fusion techniques, however, provide poor and random cell contact, leading to low yields. We present here a microfluidic device to trap and properly pair thousands of cells. Using this device, we paired different cell types, including fibroblasts, mouse embryonic stem cells and myeloma cells, achieving pairing efficiencies up to 70%. The device is compatible with both chemical and electrical fusion protocols. We observed that electrical fusion was more efficient than chemical fusion, with membrane reorganization efficiencies of up to 89%. We achieved greater than 50% properly paired and fused cells over the entire device, fivefold greater than with a commercial electrofusion chamber and observed reprogramming in hybrids between mouse embryonic stem cells and mouse embryonic fibroblasts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Takahashi, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 · Cited by 26,673
Cited by
A guide to the organ-on-a-chip
Leung, C. M., de Haan, P., Ronaldson-Bouchard, K., Kim, G.-A., Ko, J., Rho, H. S., Chen, Z., Habibovic, P., Jeon, N. L., Takayama, S., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00118-6 · Cited by 1,116
Design of pressure-driven microfluidic networks using electric circuit analogy
Oh, K. W., Lee, K., Ahn, B., & Furlani, E. P. (2012) · Lab Chip · doi:10.1039/c2lc20799k · Cited by 685
High-throughput microfluidic single-cell RT-qPCR
White, A. K., VanInsberghe, M., Petriv, O. I., Hamidi, M., Sikorski, D., Marra, M. A., Piret, J., Aparicio, S., & Hansen, C. L. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1019446108 · Cited by 440
Forcing Stem Cells to Behave: A Biophysical Perspective of the Cellular Microenvironment
Sun, Y., Chen, C. S., & Fu, J. (2012) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-042910-155306 · Cited by 425
Single Cell Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy
Stender, A. S., Marchuk, K., Liu, C., Sander, S., Meyer, M. W., Smith, E. A., Neupane, B., Wang, G., Li, J., Cheng, J.-X., et al. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300336e · Cited by 292
Automated cellular sample preparation using a Centrifuge-on-a-Chip
Mach, A. J., Kim, J. H., Arshi, A., Hur, S. C., & Di Carlo, D. (2011) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c1lc20330d · Cited by 280
Recent advances in microfluidic technologies for cell-to-cell interaction studies
Rothbauer, M., Zirath, H., & Ertl, P. (2018) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c7lc00815e · Cited by 277
Overview of single-cell analyses: microdevices and applications
Lindström, S., & Andersson-Svahn, H. (2010) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c0lc00150c · Cited by 260
Combining Machine Learning and Nanofluidic Technology To Diagnose Pancreatic Cancer Using Exosomes
Ko, J., Bhagwat, N., Yee, S. S., Ortiz, N., Sahmoud, A., Black, T., Aiello, N. M., McKenzie, L., O’Hara, M., Redlinger, C., et al. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b05503 · Cited by 249
Bridging the gap: microfluidic devices for short and long distance cell–cell communication
Vu, T. Q., de Castro, R. M. B., & Qin, L. (2017) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c6lc01367h · Cited by 63
Engineering a stem cell house into a home
Gilbert, P. M., & Blau, H. M. (2011) · Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/scrt44 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Skelley, A. M., Kirak, O., Suh, H., Jaenisch, R., & Voldman, J.
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Published
- 2009-01-04
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-152
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-7105
- OpenAlex
- W2139705669
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 33.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
