The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temporal context calibrates interval timing
Open accessAbstract
We use our sense of time to identify temporal relationships between events and to anticipate actions. The degree to which we can exploit temporal contingencies depends on the variability of our measurements of time. We asked humans to reproduce time intervals drawn from different underlying distributions. As expected, production times were more variable for longer intervals. However, production times exhibited a systematic regression toward the mean. Consequently, estimates for a sample interval differed depending on the distribution from which it was drawn. A performance-optimizing Bayesian model that takes the underlying distribution of samples into account provided an accurate description of subjects' performance, variability and bias. This finding suggests that the CNS incorporates knowledge about temporal uncertainty to adapt internal timing mechanisms to the temporal statistics of the environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion
Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415429a · Cited by 4,844
Bernardo, J. M., & Smith, A. F. M. (1994) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316870 · Cited by 2,178
Neural Basis of a Perceptual Decision in the Parietal Cortex (Area LIP) of the Rhesus Monkey
Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (2001) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2001.86.4.1916 · Cited by 1,755
Self-citationObject perception as Bayesian inference
Kersten, D., Mamassian, P., & Yuille, A. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142005 · Cited by 1,269
A representation of the hazard rate of elapsed time in macaque area LIP
Janssen, P., & Shadlen, M. N. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1386 · Cited by 601
Self-citationA cognitive signal for the proactive timing of action in macaque LIP
Maimon, G., & Assad, J. A. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1716 · Cited by 185 · cited 1×
“, and the preparatory signals in anticipation of instructed and self-generated actio”
BackgroundInactivation of the central thalamus delays self-timed saccades
Tanaka, M. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1617 · Cited by 54
Cited by
When the world becomes ‘too real’: a Bayesian explanation of autistic perception
Pellicano, E., & Burr, D. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.08.009 · Cited by 1,156
Temporal cognition: Connecting subjective time to perception, attention, and memory.
Matthews, W. J., & Meck, W. H. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000045 · Cited by 384
A Bayesian perspective on magnitude estimation
Petzschner, F. H., Glasauer, S., & Stephan, K. E. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.03.002 · Cited by 327
Neural Coding of Uncertainty and Probability
Ma, W. J., & Jazayeri, M. (2014) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014017 · Cited by 290
Self-citationBae, G.-Y., Olkkonen, M., Allred, S. R., & Flombaum, J. I. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000076 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Jazayeri, M., & Shadlen, M. N.
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2010-06-27
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1020-1026
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- OpenAlex
- W2057409808
- Cited by
- 781
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 12.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal context calibrates interval timing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nn.2590
- The paper
- Jazayeri, M., & Shadlen, M. N. (2010). Temporal context calibrates interval timing. Nature Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2590
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
