The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Goal-dependent dissociation of visual and prefrontal cortices during working memory
Open accessAbstract
To determine the specific contribution of brain regions to working memory, human participants performed two distinct tasks on the same visually presented objects. During the maintenance of visual properties, object identity could be decoded from extrastriate, but not prefrontal, cortex, whereas the opposite held for nonvisual properties. Thus, the ability to maintain information during working memory is a general and flexible cortical property, with the role of individual regions being goal-dependent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Desikan, R. S., Ségonne, F., Fischl, B., Quinn, B. T., Dickerson, B. C., Blacker, D., Buckner, R. L., Dale, A. M., Maguire, R. P., Hyman, B. T., et al. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 · Cited by 13,324
AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages
Cox, R. W. (1996) · Computers and Biomedical Research · doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 · Cited by 10,913
Mnemonic coding of visual space in the monkey's dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
Funahashi, S., Bruce, C. J., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1989) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1989.61.2.331 · Cited by 2,685
Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas
Harrison, S. A., & Tong, F. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07832 · Cited by 1,347
A new neural framework for visuospatial processing
Kravitz, D. J., Saleem, K. S., Baker, C. I., & Mishkin, M. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3008 · Cited by 1,325
Self-citationThe cognitive neuroscience of remembering
Buckner, R. L., & Wheeler, M. E. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35090048 · Cited by 462
Disentangling visual imagery and perception of real-world objects
Lee, S.-H., Kravitz, D. J., & Baker, C. I. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.055 · Cited by 263
Self-citation
Cited by
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory
D'Esposito, M., & Postle, B. R. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015031 · Cited by 1,653
The Distributed Nature of Working Memory
Christophel, T. B., Klink, P. C., Spitzer, B., Roelfsema, P. R., & Haynes, J.-D. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.12.007 · Cited by 882
Revisiting the role of persistent neural activity during working memory
Sreenivasan, K. K., Curtis, C. E., & D’Esposito, M. (2014) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.001 · Cited by 441
A Primer on Pattern-Based Approaches to fMRI: Principles, Pitfalls, and Perspectives
Haynes, J.-D. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.025 · Cited by 402
Reevaluating the Sensory Account of Visual Working Memory Storage
Xu, Y. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.013 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, S.-H., Kravitz, D. J., & Baker, C. I.
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2013-06-30
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 997-999
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- OpenAlex
- W2074236001
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 7.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Goal-dependent dissociation of visual and prefrontal cortices during working memory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nn.3452
- The paper
- Lee, S.-H., Kravitz, D. J., & Baker, C. I. (2013). Goal-dependent dissociation of visual and prefrontal cortices during working memory. Nature Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3452
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
