The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference
Abstract
Emotions operate along the dimension of approach and aversion, and it is reasonable to assume that orienting behavior is intrinsically linked to emotionally involved processes such as preference decisions. Here we describe a gaze 'cascade effect' that was present when human observers were shown pairs of human faces and instructed to decide which face was more attractive. Their gaze was initially distributed evenly between the two stimuli, but then gradually shifted toward the face that they eventually chose. Gaze bias was significantly weaker in a face shape discrimination task. In a second series of experiments, manipulation of gaze duration, but not exposure duration alone, biased observers' preference decisions. We thus conclude that gaze is actively involved in preference formation. The gaze cascade effect was also present when participants compared abstract, unfamiliar shapes for attractiveness, suggesting that orienting and preference for objects in general are intrinsically linked in a positive feedback loop leading to the conscious choice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, gaze bias appears to both reflect and influence preferences51”
From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cites
Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure
Zajonc, R. B. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025848 · Cited by 6,745
JAMES, W. (1884) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/os-ix.34.188 · Cited by 3,446
The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze
Emery, N. J. (2000) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(00)00025-7 · Cited by 2,037
Gaze and eye contact: a research review
Kleinke, C. L. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.78 · Cited by 1,455
Affective Discrimination of Stimuli That Cannot Be Recognized
Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7352271 · Cited by 1,219
The Interaction of Cognitive and Physiological Determinants of Emotional State
Schachter, S. (1964) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60048-9 · Cited by 1,186
What minds have in common is space: Spatial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy
Butterworth, G. E., & Jarrett, N. (1991) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-835x.1991.tb00862.x · Cited by 937
Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects
Leopold, D. A., O’Toole, A. J., Vetter, T. R., & Blanz, V. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/82947 · Cited by 875
Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates
Sakai, K., & Miyashita, Y. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/354152a0 · Cited by 743
James, W. (1977) · Williams & Wilkins eBooks · doi:10.1037/10735-001 · Cited by 661
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 920
Using Eye Movement to Determine Whether Closed-Frame Shots Attract Viewers’ Attention
Tseng, H., Chuang, H.-C., Tang, D.-L., & Wen, C.-W. (2024) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440241290629 · Cited by 6
Impact of leading line composition on visual cognition: An eye-tracking study
Chuang, H.-C., Tseng, H., & Chiang, C.-Y. (2024) · Journal of Eye Movement Research · doi:10.16910/jemr.17.5.2 · Cited by 6
Crossmodal Postdiction: Conscious Perception as Revisionist History
Stiles, N. R. B., Tanguay, A. R., & Shimojo, S. (2022) · Journal of Perceptual Imaging · doi:10.2352/j.percept.imaging.2022.5.000403 · Cited by 7
Gaze-informed modeling of preference learning and prediction.
Smith, S. M., & Krajbich, I. M. (2019) · Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics · doi:10.1037/npe0000107 · Cited by 6
Do Animation Direction and Position of Progress Bar Affect Selections?
Yokoyama, K., Nakamura, S., & Yamanaka, S. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85607-6_45 · Cited by 6
Interpersonal Oculesics: Eye-Related Signals of Attraction, Interest, and Connection
Bowman, J. M., & Compton, B. L. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-94492-6_1 · Cited by 6
How neurons, norms, and institutions shape group cooperation
Bavel, J. J. V., Pärnamets, P., Reinero, D. A., & Packer, D. J. (2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2022.04.004 · Cited by 9
Where do our preferences come from? How hard decisions shape our preferences
Voigt, K. (2022) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2022.956307 · Cited by 6
Cognitive load influences Wristwatch's legibility and purchase Preference: An eye tracking study
Chen, G., Chen, J., Zhao, X., Fu, L., & Zhang, P. (2023) · Displays · doi:10.1016/j.displa.2023.102375 · Cited by 6
Milani, S., Armstrong, T., Dalmaijer, E. S., Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., & Dawson, S. J. (2023) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2023.2209792 · Cited by 6
A query theory account of the attraction effect
Poon, N., Luckman, A., Isoni, A., & Mullett, T. L. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105495 · Cited by 6
Identifying Objects in Images from Analyzing the Users’ Gaze Movements for Provided Tags
Walber, T., Ansgar Scherp, A., & Staab, S. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27355-1_15 · Cited by 6
Emotion and Rationality in Web Information: An Eye-Tracking Study
Qin, L., Zhong, N., Lu, S., Li, M., & Yangyang, S. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23620-4_15 · Cited by 6
Prefrontal mechanisms in preference and non-preference-based judgments
Foo, J. C., Haji, T., & Sakai, K. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.046 · Cited by 7
Changing minds by tracking eyes: Dynamical systems, gaze and moral decisions
Pärnamets, P., Johansson, P., Balkenius, C., Häll, L., Spivey, M. J., & Richardson, D. C. (2013) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 6
Decision Prediction Using Visual Patterns
Qin, L., Zhong, N., Lu, S., & Li, M. (2013) · Fundamenta Informaticae · doi:10.3233/fi-2013-926 · Cited by 6
Consumers' Bayesian learning under Knightian uncertainty: An eye‐tracking analysis
Song, H., & Jiang, Y. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.1740 · Cited by 6
Leder, H., & Pelowski, M. J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198824350.013.43 · Cited by 6
Castagna, P. J., van Noordt, S. J. R., Sederberg, P. B., & Crowley, M. J. (2023) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.119871 · Cited by 7
When Your Decisions Are Not (Quite) Your Own: Action Observation Influences Free Choices
Cole, G. G., Wright, D., Doneva, S. P., & Skarratt, P. A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127766 · Cited by 5
Veneri, G., Pretegiani, E., Fargnoli, F., Rosini, F., Vinciguerra, C., Federighi, P., Federico, A., & Rufa, A. (2014) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.12639 · Cited by 6
Goal-directed visual attention drives health goal priming: An eye-tracking experiment
van der Laan, L. N., Papies, E. K., Hooge, I. T. C., & Smeets, P. A. M. (2016) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.08.054 · Cited by 6
Using Eye Movements to Investigate Insight Problem Solving
Ellis, J. J. (2012) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 6
Nonlinear probability weighting can reflect attentional biases in sequential samplingPreprint
Zilker, V., & Pachur, T. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/dqexn · Cited by 6
An uncertainty-based model of the effects of fixation on choicePreprint
Li, Z., & Ma, W. J. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ajmwx · Cited by 5
Hunger shifts attention and attribute weighting in dietary choicePreprint
March, J., & Gluth, S. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.103736 · Cited by 9
Williams, L., Mulder, K. J., Charlton-Perez, A., Lickiss, M., Black, A., McCloy, R., McSorley, E., & Young, J. (2023) · Geoscience Communication · doi:10.5194/gc-6-111-2023 · Cited by 4
Senftleben, U., Kruse, J., Scherbaum, S., & Korb, F. M. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16193343 · Cited by 5
Classification of gaze preference decision for human-machine interaction using eye tracking device
Shimizu, S., & HASHIZUME, T. (2010) · IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO) · doi:10.1109/robio.2010.5723365 · Cited by 5
Eye gaze as a cue for recognizing intention and coordinating joint action
Amati, F., & Brennan, S. E. (2018) · Advances in interaction studies · doi:10.1075/ais.10.02ama · Cited by 5
Vargas-Alvarez, M. Á., Al-Sehaim, H., Brunstrom, J. M., Castelnuovo, G., Navas‐Carretero, S., Martínez, J. A., & Almiron‐Roig, E. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01745-9 · Cited by 5
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Attention-Grabbing Power of Branded vs. Unbranded Packaging
(2019) · Journal of Promotion Management · doi:10.1080/10496491.2019.1612489 · Cited by 5
RetractedSpeed of person perception affects immediate and ongoing aesthetic evaluation
Khaw, M. W., Nichols, P., & Freedberg, D. (2019) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.05.006 · Cited by 6
Testing the Relationship Between Looking Time and Choice Preference in Long-tailed Macaques
Wilson, V. A. D., Kade, C., & Fischer, J. (2021) · Animal Behavior and Cognition · doi:10.26451/abc.08.03.03.2021 · Cited by 5
Eye-Tracking und reaktionszeitbasierte Verfahren zur Messung impliziter Kommunikationswirkungen
Palcu, J., & Florack, A. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-8349-3857-2_11 · Cited by 5
Spiral response-cascade hypothesis
Yoshikawa, Y., Yamamoto, S., Sumioka, H., Ishiguro, H., & Asada, M. (2008) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/1349822.1349864 · Cited by 5
Taken last, selected first: The sampling bias is also present in the haptic domain
Mitsuda, T., & Yoshioka, Y. (2014) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0803-3 · Cited by 5
Orienting and preference: an enquiry into the mechanisms underlying human decision making
Simion, C. (2005) · CaltechTHESIS (California Institute of Technology) · doi:10.7907/pwan-xk37 · Cited by 6
Self-citationPredictable Effects of Bottom-up Visual Salience in Experimental Decisions and GamesPreprint
Li, X., & Camerer, C. F. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3308886 · Cited by 5
Altering the availability of products within physical micro-environments: A conceptual frameworkPreprint
Pechey, R., Hollands, G. J., Carter, P., & Marteau, T. M. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qzb3w · Cited by 5
Frömer, R., Callaway, F., Griffiths, T. L., & Shenhav, A. (2025) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi.a.3 · Cited by 4
Is future bias just a manifestation of the temporal value asymmetry?
Caruso, E. M., Latham, A. J., & Miller, K. (2024) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2024.2360673 · Cited by 4
Takehana, A., Tanaka, D., Arai, M., Hattori, Y., Yoshimoto, T., Matsui, T., Sadato, N., Chikazoe, J., & Jimura, K. (2024) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhae302 · Cited by 4
Accuracy and Fairness in Pupil Detection Algorithm
Kulkarni, O. N., Patil, V., Singh, V. K., & Atrey, P. K. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Big Data · doi:10.1109/bigmm52142.2021.00011 · Cited by 4
Accounting for the last-sampling bias in perceptual decision-making
Zhu, T. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105049 · Cited by 4
Facilitating animacy perception by manipulating stimuli exposure time
Saito, T. I., Motoki, K., Nouchi, R., & Sugiura, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017685 · Cited by 4
Effect of conformity on evolution of cooperation in a coordination game
王, X. 先. W., & 王, T. 饕. W. (2023) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/acd9c2 · Cited by 4
Enhancement of Handshake Attraction through Tactile, Visual, and Auditory Multimodal Stimulation
Kumagai, T., & Nonomura, Y. (2023) · Technologies · doi:10.3390/technologies11040086 · Cited by 4
Törngren, S. O., Schütze, C., Belle, E. V., & Nyström, M. (2024) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1222850 · Cited by 4
Choice Repetition Bias in Intertemporal Choice: An Eye‐Tracking Study
Senftleben, U., Schoemann, M., & Scherbaum, S. (2024) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2388 · Cited by 4
The role of attention in multi attribute decision making
Sampson, A. L., Yang, Y.-P., Usher, M., Levy, D. J., Niebur, E., & Stuphorn, V. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-66579-x · Cited by 6
Taylor, P., He, Z. G., Bilgrien, N., & Siegelmann, H. T. (2015) · Frontiers in ICT · doi:10.3389/fict.2015.00015 · Cited by 4
MONKEYS EXHIBIT PREFERENCE FOR BIOLOGICALLY NON-SIGNIFICANT VISUAL STIMULI
Takebayashi, M., & Funahashi, S. (2009) · PSYCHOLOGIA · doi:10.2117/psysoc.2009.147 · Cited by 4
Schlereth, C., & Schulz, F. (2014) · Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1007/bf03372910 · Cited by 4
Haass‐Koffler, C. L., Souza, R., Wilmott, J. P., Aston, E. R., & Song, J. (2020) · Alcohol and Alcoholism · doi:10.1093/alcalc/agaa089 · Cited by 4
The postdictive effect of choice reflects the modulation of attention on choice
Shen, M., Zhou, Y., Chen, L., Zhou, J., & Chen, H. (2020) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.20.13.1 · Cited by 4
The Negative and Positive Consequences of Placing Nonpromoted Products Next to Promoted Products
Kan, C., Liu, Y., Lichtenstein, D. R., & Janiszewski, C. A. (2023) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/00222429231172111 · Cited by 4
Zilker, V. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-68969-5 · Cited by 4
Variability and accessibility of information guide gaze dynamics in decision making.
Lee, D. G., Tsetsos, K., Pezzulo, G., Shahar, N., & Usher, M. (2025) · Decision · doi:10.1037/dec0000255 · Cited by 4
The (In)visibility of Psychodiagnosticians' Expertise
Schulte‐Mecklenbeck, M., Spaanjaars, N. L., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1925 · Cited by 4
Learning from Animation: Smooth Pursuits of Synaptic Transmission of an Impulse with Contextual Cues
Köseoğlu, P., Mazman, S. G., Altun, A., & Efendioğlu, A. (2013) · World Journal on Educational Technology Current Issues · Cited by 4
Preference for attractive faces is species-specific.
Damon, F., Li, Z., Yan, Y., Li, W., Guo, K., Quinn, P. C., Pascalis, O., & Méary, D. (2018) · Journal of comparative psychology · doi:10.1037/com0000148 · Cited by 4
He, J., Jin, L., Guan, Y. H., & Zi, H. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2020.1807998 · Cited by 4
Shinsuke Shimojo, A. (2006) · Nihon Kikai Gakkaishi/Journal of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers · doi:10.1299/jsmemag.109.1049_261 · Cited by 4
Inducing preference reversals in aesthetic choices for paintings: Introducing the contrast paradigm
Belchev, Z., Bodner, G. E., & Fawcett, J. M. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196246 · Cited by 5
Huang, Y., Kuo, F., & Chen, C.-W. (2018) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01087-4_25 · Cited by 3
Król, M. K., & Król, M. E. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000711 · Cited by 4
Complexity Aversion in Risky Choices and Valuations: Moderators and Possible CausesPreprint
Oberholzer, Y., Olschewski, S., & Scheibehenne, B. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/tnvzr · Cited by 4
Information foraging for perceptual decisionsPreprint
Ludwig, C. J. H., & Evens, D. R. (2016) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/wfc3r · Cited by 4
A computational model for individual differences in non-reinforced learning for individual itemsPreprint
Salomon, T., Itzkovitch, A., Daw, N. D., & Schönberg, T. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.03.20.484477 · Cited by 4
Du, M., & (Ryu), K. H. Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1692737 · Cited by 4
Fixed Attributes and Discounting Behavior
Cao, Q., Hofmeyr, A., Hsu, E., LUO, S. H., & Monterosso, J. R. (2021) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000535 · Cited by 3
Cognitive and neural bases of visual-context-guided decision-making
Sun, S., Yu, H., Wang, S., & Yu, R. (2023) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120170 · Cited by 3
Similar Gap-Overlap Profiles in Children with Fragile X Syndrome and IQ-Matched Autism
Wall, C. A., Shic, F., Will, E., Wang, Q., & Roberts, J. E. (2024) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-024-06245-1 · Cited by 3
Ma, C., Jin, Y., & Lauwereyns, J. (2024) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-024-10151-8 · Cited by 3
The Psychological Nature of Female Gait Attractiveness
Tanabe, H., & Yamamoto, K. (2024) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering11101037 · Cited by 3
A registered report on presentation factors that influence the attraction effect
Hasan, E., Liu, Y., Owens, N., & Trueblood, J. S. (2025) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/jdm.2024.27 · Cited by 3
Gleichauf, K., Wagner-Hartl, V., Ackner, G. J., & Pfeffer, S. (2025) · Applied System Innovation · doi:10.3390/asi8020027 · Cited by 3
Laeng, B., Øvervoll, M., & Ala-Pettersen, E. A. (2025) · Perception · doi:10.1177/03010066251345994 · Cited by 3
Attentional capture by spoken language: effects on netballers’ visual task performance
Bishop, D. T., Moore, S., Horne, S., & Teszka, R. (2014) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2014.908323 · Cited by 3
Verbeke, W., & Pozharliev, R. (2016) · International Journal of Marketing Studies · doi:10.5539/ijms.v8n4p1 · Cited by 3
Brain Big Data in Wisdom Web of Things
Zhong, N., Yau, S. S., Ma, J., Shinsuke Shimojo, A., Just, M. A., Hu, B., Wang, G., Oiwa, K., & Anzai, Y. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44198-6_15 · Cited by 3
Biological Responsiveness in Observing Sexual Attractiveness of Woman
Yonezawa, T., Yamamoto, S., Doi, H., Shinohara, K., & Tsumura, N. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Big Data · doi:10.1109/bigmm.2017.89 · Cited by 3
Artificial Faces Predict Gaze Allocation in Complex Dynamic Scenes
Rösler, L., Rubo, M., & Gamer, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02877 · Cited by 3
Shi, R. (2020) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244020923358 · Cited by 3
Item Features Interact With Item Category in Their Influence on Preferences
Oren, S., Sela, T., Levy, D. J., & Schönberg, T. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00988 · Cited by 3
Salience effects in information acquisition: No evidence for a top-down coherence influence
Bröder, A., Scharf, S. E., Jekel, M., Glöckner, A., & Franke, N. (2021) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-021-01188-9 · Cited by 3
Sharing Photos on Social Media: Visual Attention Affects Real-World Decision Making
Fagan, S. E., Wade, L., Hugenberg, K., Kapadia, A. C., & Bertenthal, B. I. (2021) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79997-7_25 · Cited by 3
What Makes an Image Interesting and How Can We Explain It
Gardezi, M., Fung, K. H., Baig, U. M., Ismail, M., Kadosh, O., Bonneh, Y. S., & Sheth, B. R. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.668651 · Cited by 3
Ito, A., Yoshida, K., Aoki, R., Fujii, T., Kawasaki, I., Hayashi, A., Ueno, A., Sakai, S., Mugikura, S., Takahashi, S., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.822234 · Cited by 3
Vegetation Dispersion, Interspersion, and Landscape Preference
Costa, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.771543 · Cited by 4
Çelik, S., & TÜRKER, M. V. (2022) · Istanbul Business Research · doi:10.26650/ibr.2022.51.837555 · Cited by 3
Gaze Preference Decision Making Predictor Using RNN Classifier
Sato, S., Shimizu, S., & Hamada, K. (2022) · Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON) · doi:10.1109/iecon49645.2022.9968869 · Cited by 3
Value-modulated attentional capture is augmented by win-related sensory cues
Pearson, D., Piao, M., & Pelley, M. E. L. (2023) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218231160368 · Cited by 3
The framing of choice nudges prolonged processing in the evaluation of food images
Xu, J., Jin, Y., & Lauwereyns, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1039251 · Cited by 3
Gabay, M., & Schönberg, T. (2023) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-023-00839-3 · Cited by 3
Uto, N. (2023) · Behaviormetrika · doi:10.1007/s41237-023-00210-5 · Cited by 4
How does divided attention hinder different stages of episodic memory retrieval?
Ataseven, N., Ünver, N., & Günseli, E. (2023) · Current Research in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.crbeha.2023.100139 · Cited by 7
Consumer Attention to a Coffee Brewing Robot: An Eye‐Tracking Study
Lee, C., Kim, S., Lim, M., Hwang, S., Kim, D., & Kwak, H. S. (2024) · Journal of Sensory Studies · doi:10.1111/joss.12950 · Cited by 3
A study on the aesthetic preference of product display: An example of smart speaker
Zhu, Y., & Luo, S. (2024) · Displays · doi:10.1016/j.displa.2024.102920 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Shimojo, S., Simion, C., Shimojo, E., & Scheier, C.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Bunkyo Gakuin University (JP)
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2003-11-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1317-1322
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- OpenAlex
- W2115276604
- Cited by
- 924
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 58 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
- Keywords
- gaze bias, cascading effects, preference formation, facial attractiveness, orienting, gaze duration, positive feedback loop, visual attention
- MeSH terms
- Choice Behavior, Discrimination, Psychological, Emotions, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Statistics, Nonparametric
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review