The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference
Abstract
Emotions operate along the dimension of approach and aversion, and it is reasonable to assume that orienting behavior is intrinsically linked to emotionally involved processes such as preference decisions. Here we describe a gaze 'cascade effect' that was present when human observers were shown pairs of human faces and instructed to decide which face was more attractive. Their gaze was initially distributed evenly between the two stimuli, but then gradually shifted toward the face that they eventually chose. Gaze bias was significantly weaker in a face shape discrimination task. In a second series of experiments, manipulation of gaze duration, but not exposure duration alone, biased observers' preference decisions. We thus conclude that gaze is actively involved in preference formation. The gaze cascade effect was also present when participants compared abstract, unfamiliar shapes for attractiveness, suggesting that orienting and preference for objects in general are intrinsically linked in a positive feedback loop leading to the conscious choice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, gaze bias appears to both reflect and influence preferences51”
From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cites
Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure
Zajonc, R. B. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025848 · Cited by 6,745
JAMES, W. (1884) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/os-ix.34.188 · Cited by 3,446
The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze
Emery, N. J. (2000) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(00)00025-7 · Cited by 2,037
Gaze and eye contact: a research review
Kleinke, C. L. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.78 · Cited by 1,455
Affective Discrimination of Stimuli That Cannot Be Recognized
Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7352271 · Cited by 1,219
The Interaction of Cognitive and Physiological Determinants of Emotional State
Schachter, S. (1964) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60048-9 · Cited by 1,186
What minds have in common is space: Spatial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy
Butterworth, G. E., & Jarrett, N. (1991) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-835x.1991.tb00862.x · Cited by 937
Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects
Leopold, D. A., O’Toole, A. J., Vetter, T. R., & Blanz, V. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/82947 · Cited by 875
Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates
Sakai, K., & Miyashita, Y. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/354152a0 · Cited by 743
James, W. (1977) · Williams & Wilkins eBooks · doi:10.1037/10735-001 · Cited by 661
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice
Krajbich, I., Armel, C., & Rangel, A. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2635 · Cited by 1,408
Attention and choice: A review on eye movements in decision making
Orquin, J. L., & Loose, S. M. (2013) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.003 · Cited by 1,030
Krajbich, I. M., & Rangel, A. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1101328108 · Cited by 774
Branding the brain: A critical review and outlook
Plaßmann, H., Ramsøy, T. Z., & Milosavljevic, M. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.010 · Cited by 687
Hare, T. A., Malmaud, J., & Rangel, A. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6383-10.2011 · Cited by 556
Leder, H., & Nadal, M. (2014) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12084 · Cited by 593
Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention
Armel, K. C., Beaumel, A., & Rangel, A. (2008) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500000413 · Cited by 428
Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture
Vartanian, O. A., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A. K., Fich, L. B., Leder, H., Modroño, C., Nadal, M., Rostrup, N., & Skov, M. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1301227110 · Cited by 417
On The Use of Neurophysiological Tools in Is Research: Developing A Research Agenda for Neurois1
Dimoka, A., Banker, R. D., Benbasat, I., Davis, F. D., Dennis, A. R., Gefen, D., Gupta, A., Ischebeck, A. K., Kenning, Pavlou, P. A., et al. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41703475 · Cited by 435
Relative visual saliency differences induce sizable bias in consumer choice
Milosavljevic, M., Navalpakkam, V., Koch, C., & Rangel, A. (2011) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.10.002 · Cited by 426
Decoding subjective decisions from orbitofrontal cortex
Rich, E. L., & Wallis, J. D. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4320 · Cited by 368
The Attentional Drift-Diffusion Model Extends to Simple Purchasing Decisions
Krajbich, I. M., Lu, D., Camerer, C. F., & Rangel, A. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00193 · Cited by 392
Lim, S.-L., O'Doherty, J. P., & Rangel, A. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1246-11.2011 · Cited by 329
Eye Tracking for Visual Marketing
Wedel, M., & Pieters, R. G. M. (2008) · Foundations and Trends® in Marketing · doi:10.1561/1700000011 · Cited by 400
Paying attention to attention in depression
Keller, A. S., Leikauf, J. E., Holt-Gosselin, B., Staveland, B. R., & Williams, L. M. (2019) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-019-0616-1 · Cited by 329
Shining in the Center: Central Gaze Cascade Effect on Product Choice
Atalay, A. S., Bodur, H. O., & Rasolofoarison, D. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/665984 · Cited by 326
Wolfgang Einhäuser, A., Rutishauser, U., & Christof Koch, A. (2008) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/8.2.2 · Cited by 296
Risko, E. F., Laidlaw, K. E. W., Freeth, M., Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00143 · Cited by 298
Affective evaluations of objects are influenced by observed gaze direction and emotional expression☆
Bayliss, A. P., Frischen, A., FENSKE, M., & Tipper, S. P. (2006) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.012 · Cited by 287
Eye tracking and pupillometry are indicators of dissociable latent decision processes.
Cavanagh, J. F., Wiecki, T. V., Kochar, A., & Frank, M. J. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0035813 · Cited by 289
Threats to the validity of eye-movement research in psychology
Orquin, J. L., & Holmqvist, K. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0998-z · Cited by 280
Neuroeconomic Foundations of Economic Choice—Recent Advances
Fehr, E., & Rangel, A. (2011) · The Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.25.4.3 · Cited by 283
A meta-analytic review of two modes of learning and the description-experience gap.
Wulff, D. U., Mergenthaler, M., & Hertwig, R. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000115 · Cited by 275
Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2022) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-051520-011616 · Cited by 281
Towal, R. B., Mormann, M. M., & Koch, C. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1304429110 · Cited by 268
Gaze cuing and affective judgments of objects: I like what you look at
Bayliss, A. P., Paul, M. A., Cannon, P. R., & Tipper, S. P. (2006) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03213926 · Cited by 243
The Dynamics of Decision Making in Risky Choice: An Eye-Tracking Analysis
Fiedler, S., & Glöckner, A. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00335 · Cited by 263
Cognitive and emotional engagement while learning with VR: The perspective of multimodal methodology
Dubovi, I. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104495 · Cited by 278
Eye movement monitoring as a process tracing methodology in decision making research.
Glaholt, M. G., & Reingold, E. M. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics · doi:10.1037/a0020692 · Cited by 253
Social cognitive neuroscience: where are we heading?
Blakemore, S.-J., Winston, J., & Frith, U. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.03.012 · Cited by 224
Beauty and the beholder: Highly individual taste for abstract, but not real-world images
Vessel, E. A. (2010) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/10.2.18 · Cited by 221
Do you like what you see? The role of first fixation and total fixation duration in consumer choice
van der Laan, L. N., Hooge, I. T. C., de Ridder, D. T. D., Viergever, M. A., & Smeets, P. A. M. (2014) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.06.015 · Cited by 216
Biasing moral decisions by exploiting the dynamics of eye gaze
Pärnamets, P., Johansson, P., Hall, L., Balkenius, C., Spivey, M. J., & Richardson, D. C. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1415250112 · Cited by 230
Gaze Amplifies Value in Decision Making
Smith, S. M., & Krajbich, I. M. (2018) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797618810521 · Cited by 227
Areas of Interest as a Signal Detection Problem in Behavioral Eye‐Tracking Research
Orquin, J. L., Ashby, N. J. S., & Clarke, A. D. F. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1867 · Cited by 192
Using Visual Design to Improve Customer Perceptions of Online Assortments
Kahn, B. E. (2016) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2016.11.004 · Cited by 200
Gidlöf, K., Wallin, A., Dewhurst, R., & Holmqvist, K. (2013) · Journal of Eye Movement Research · doi:10.16910/jemr.6.1.3 · Cited by 210
Accounting for attention in sequential sampling models of decision making
Krajbich, I. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.008 · Cited by 165
Value-based attention but not divisive normalization influences decisions with multiple alternatives
Gluth, S., Kern, N., Kortmann, M., & Vitali, C. L. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0822-0 · Cited by 188
George, N., & Conty, L. (2008) · Neurophysiologie Clinique · doi:10.1016/j.neucli.2008.03.001 · Cited by 176
Summerfield, C., & Tsetsos, K. (2012) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00070 · Cited by 167
Shi, S. W., Wedel, M., & Pieters, F. G. M. (2012) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1625 · Cited by 181
Gidlöf, K., Anikin, A., Lingonblad, M., & Wallin, A. (2017) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.04.020 · Cited by 174
Changing value through cued approach: an automatic mechanism of behavior change
Schonberg, T., Bakkour, A., Hover, A. M., Mumford, J. A., Nagar, L., Perez, J., & Poldrack, R. A. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3673 · Cited by 161
Amount and time exert independent influences on intertemporal choice
Amasino, D. R., Sullivan, N., Kranton, R., & Huettel, S. A. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0537-2 · Cited by 125
Understanding cognitive and affective mechanisms in social psychology through eye-tracking
Rahal, R.-M., & Fiedler, S. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103842 · Cited by 171
Temporal isolation of neural processes underlying face preference decisions
Kim, H., Adolphs, R., O’Doherty, J. P., & Shinsuke Shimojo, A. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0703101104 · Cited by 150
Stewart, N., Hermens, F., & Matthews, W. J. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1854 · Cited by 164
Guo, F., Ding, Y., Liu, W., Liu, C., & Zhang, X. (2016) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2015.12.001 · Cited by 148
What they see is what they get? An fMRI‐study on neural correlates of attractive packaging
Stoll, M., Baecke, S., & Kenning, P. H. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.256 · Cited by 146
Multialternative decision by sampling: A model of decision making constrained by process data.
Noguchi, T., & Stewart, N. (2018) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000102 · Cited by 152
Roesch, E. B., Tamarit, L., Revéret, L., Grandjean, D., Sander, D., & Scherer, K. R. (2010) · Journal of Nonverbal Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10919-010-0095-9 · Cited by 145
Meißner, M., Musalem, A., & Huber, J. C. (2015) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0467 · Cited by 144
Bell, L., Vogt, J., Willemse, C., Routledge, T., Butler, L. T., & Sakaki, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01655 · Cited by 158
Noguchi, T., & Stewart, N. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.006 · Cited by 133
The Attentional Drift Diffusion Model of Simple Perceptual Decision-Making
Tavares, G., Perona, P., & Rangel, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00468 · Cited by 151
Pfeiffer, J., Pfeiffer, T., Meißner, M., & Weiß, E. (2020) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2019.0907 · Cited by 134
Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: Attractive faces are not always average.
DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Unger, L., Little, A. C., & Feinberg, D. R. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1420 · Cited by 139
Fixation patterns in simple choice reflect optimal information sampling
Callaway, F., Rangel, A., & Griffiths, T. L. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008863 · Cited by 143
The default-mode network represents aesthetic appeal that generalizes across visual domains
Vessel, E. A., Isik, A. I., Belfi, A. M., Stahl, J. L., & Starr, G. G. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1902650116 · Cited by 127
Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making
Gluth, S., Spektor, M. S., & Rieskamp, J. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.39659 · Cited by 134
Prospect theory reflects selective allocation of attention.
Pachur, T., Schulte‐Mecklenbeck, M., Murphy, R. O., & Hertwig, R. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000406 · Cited by 133
Attention and choice across domains.
Smith, S. M., & Krajbich, I. M. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000482 · Cited by 121
Webcam-based online eye-tracking for behavioral research
Yang, X., & Krajbich, I. M. (2021) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500008512 · Cited by 120
Social Signals in Primate Orbitofrontal Cortex
Watson, K. K., & Platt, M. L. (2012) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.10.016 · Cited by 127
The case against economic values in the orbitofrontal cortex (or anywhere else in the brain).
Hayden, B. Y., & Niv, Y. (2021) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/bne0000448 · Cited by 127
Eye-tracking research on sensory and consumer science: A review, pitfalls and future directions
Motoki, K., Saito, T. I., & Onuma, T. (2021) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110389 · Cited by 135
Gender and Visibility of Sexual Cues Influence Eye Movements While Viewing Faces and Bodies
Nummenmaa, L., Hietanen, J. K., Santtila, P. O., & Hyönä, J. (2012) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9911-0 · Cited by 113
The time course of gaze bias in visual decision tasks
Glaholt, M. G., & Reingold, E. M. (2008) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506280802362962 · Cited by 121
Gaze behaviour during space perception and spatial decision making
Wiener, J. M., Hölscher, C., Büchner, S. J., & Konieczny, L. (2011) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-011-0397-5 · Cited by 111
Early interactions between orienting, visual sampling and decision making in facial preference
Simion, C., & Shimojo, S. (2006) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.019 · Cited by 116
Self-citationOrbitofrontal Cortex Value Signals Depend on Fixation Location during Free Viewing
McGinty, V. B., Rangel, A., & Newsome, W. T. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.045 · Cited by 117
The Pugh Controlled Convergence method: model-based evaluation and implications for design theory
Frey, D., Herder, P., Wijnia, Y. C., Subrahmanian, E., Katsikopoulos, K. V., & Clausing, D. P. (2008) · Research in Engineering Design · doi:10.1007/s00163-008-0056-z · Cited by 109
Simola, J., Salojärvi, J., & Kojo, I. (2008) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.01.002 · Cited by 107
Gaze bias: Selective encoding and liking effects
Schotter, E. R., Berry, R. W., McKenzie, C. R. M., & Rayner, K. (2010) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506281003668900 · Cited by 108
When attractiveness demands longer looks: The effects of situation and gender
Leder, H., Tinio, P. P. L., Fuchs, I., & Bohrn, I. C. (2010) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470211003605142 · Cited by 110
Gaze bias differences capture individual choice behaviour
Thomas, A. W., Molter, F., Krajbich, I. M., Heekeren, H. R., & Mohr, P. N. C. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0584-8 · Cited by 129
Through their eyes: selective attention in peahens during courtship
Yorzinski, J. L., Patricelli, G. L., Babcock, J. S., Pearson, J. M., & Platt, M. L. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.087338 · Cited by 100
Stimulus exposure and gaze bias: A further test of the gaze cascade model
Glaholt, M. G., & Reingold, E. M. (2009) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/app.71.3.445 · Cited by 111
An analysis of process-tracing research on consumer decision-making
Zuschke, N. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.028 · Cited by 120
The Computation of Stimulus Values in Simple Choice
Rangel, A., & Clithero, J. A. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-416008-8.00008-5 · Cited by 102
Goal-directed visual attention drives health goal priming: An eye-tracking experiment.
van der Laan, L. N., Papies, E. K., Hooge, I. T. C., & Smeets, P. A. M. (2016) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000410 · Cited by 97
Yoo, S. B. M., Hayden, B. Y., & Pearson, J. M. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0664 · Cited by 101
Taufique, K. M. R. (2020) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2020.1866645 · Cited by 115
Noland, R. B., Weiner, M. D., Gao, D., Cook, M. P., & Nelessen, A. C. (2016) · Journal of Urbanism International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability · doi:10.1080/17549175.2016.1187197 · Cited by 93
How Beauty Determines Gaze! Facial Attractiveness and Gaze Duration in Images of Real World Scenes
Leder, H., Mitrovic, A., & Goller, J. (2016) · i-Perception · doi:10.1177/2041669516664355 · Cited by 104
Carbon labels on restaurant menus: do people pay attention to them?
Babakhani, N., Lee, A., & Dolničar, S. (2019) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2019.1670187 · Cited by 104
Synchronising movements with the sounds of a virtual partner enhances partner likeability
Launay, J., Dean, R. T., & Bailes, F. (2014) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-014-0618-0 · Cited by 91
Next steps in neuroaesthetics: Which processes and processing stages to study?
Leder, H. (2013) · Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts · doi:10.1037/a0031585 · Cited by 96
Have an eye on the buckled cucumber: An eye tracking study on visually suboptimal foods
Helmert, J. R., Symmank, C., Pannasch, S., & Rohm, H. (2017) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.03.009 · Cited by 91
Richards, M. R., Fields, H. W., Beck, F. M., Firestone, A. R., Walther, D. B., Rosenstiel, S., & Sacksteder, J. M. (2015) · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.12.016 · Cited by 89
Focusing on what you own: Biased information uptake due to ownership
Ashby, N. J. S., Dickert, S., & Glöckner, A. (2012) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500002230 · Cited by 90
Simion, C., & Shimojo, S. (2007) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03193916 · Cited by 92
Self-citationKonovalov, A., & Krajbich, I. M. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12438 · Cited by 98
The Power of Attention: Using Eye Gaze to Predict Other-Regarding and Moral Choices
Ghaffari, M., & Fiedler, S. (2018) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797618799301 · Cited by 85
Effects of subjective preference of colors on attention-related occipital theta oscillations
Kawasaki, M., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.042 · Cited by 86
Identifying processes underlying the multimedia effect in testing: An eye-movement analysis
Lindner, M. A., Eitel, A., Strobel, B., & Köller, O. (2016) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.10.007 · Cited by 87
A Handbook of Process Tracing Methods
Schulte‐Mecklenbeck, M., Kühberger, A., & Johnson, J. G. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315160559 · Cited by 116
Recent updates of eye movement abnormalities in patients with schizophrenia: A scoping review
Wolf, A., Ueda, K., & Hirano, Y. (2020) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.13188 · Cited by 83
Using eye tracking to test for individual differences in attention to attractive faces
Valuch, C., Pflüger, L. S., Wallner, B., Laeng, B., & Ulrich Ansorge, A. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00042 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Shimojo, S., Simion, C., Shimojo, E., & Scheier, C.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Bunkyo Gakuin University (JP)
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2003-11-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1317-1322
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- OpenAlex
- W2115276604
- Cited by
- 924
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 58 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
- Keywords
- gaze bias, cascading effects, preference formation, facial attractiveness, orienting, gaze duration, positive feedback loop, visual attention
- MeSH terms
- Choice Behavior, Discrimination, Psychological, Emotions, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Statistics, Nonparametric
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review