The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference
Abstract
Emotions operate along the dimension of approach and aversion, and it is reasonable to assume that orienting behavior is intrinsically linked to emotionally involved processes such as preference decisions. Here we describe a gaze 'cascade effect' that was present when human observers were shown pairs of human faces and instructed to decide which face was more attractive. Their gaze was initially distributed evenly between the two stimuli, but then gradually shifted toward the face that they eventually chose. Gaze bias was significantly weaker in a face shape discrimination task. In a second series of experiments, manipulation of gaze duration, but not exposure duration alone, biased observers' preference decisions. We thus conclude that gaze is actively involved in preference formation. The gaze cascade effect was also present when participants compared abstract, unfamiliar shapes for attractiveness, suggesting that orienting and preference for objects in general are intrinsically linked in a positive feedback loop leading to the conscious choice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, gaze bias appears to both reflect and influence preferences51”
From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cites
Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure
Zajonc, R. B. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025848 · Cited by 6,745
JAMES, W. (1884) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/os-ix.34.188 · Cited by 3,446
The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze
Emery, N. J. (2000) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(00)00025-7 · Cited by 2,037
Gaze and eye contact: a research review
Kleinke, C. L. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.78 · Cited by 1,455
Affective Discrimination of Stimuli That Cannot Be Recognized
Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7352271 · Cited by 1,219
The Interaction of Cognitive and Physiological Determinants of Emotional State
Schachter, S. (1964) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60048-9 · Cited by 1,186
What minds have in common is space: Spatial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy
Butterworth, G. E., & Jarrett, N. (1991) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-835x.1991.tb00862.x · Cited by 937
Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects
Leopold, D. A., O’Toole, A. J., Vetter, T. R., & Blanz, V. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/82947 · Cited by 875
Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates
Sakai, K., & Miyashita, Y. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/354152a0 · Cited by 743
James, W. (1977) · Williams & Wilkins eBooks · doi:10.1037/10735-001 · Cited by 661
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 920
Neural components underlying subjective preferential decision making
Lindsen, J. P., Jones, R., Shinsuke Shimojo, A., & Bhattacharya, J. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.079 · Cited by 40
van der Laan, L. N., de Ridder, D. T. D., Charbonnier, L., Viergever, M. A., & Smeets, P. A. M. (2014) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00184 · Cited by 39
Glaholt, M. G., & Reingold, E. M. (2012) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2012.666295 · Cited by 39
Persistent Reliance on Facial Appearance Among Older Adults When Judging Someone’s Trustworthiness
Suzuki, A. (2016) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbw034 · Cited by 37
Multi-attribute, multi-alternative models of choice: Choice, reaction time, and process tracing
Cohen, A. L., Kang, N., & Leise, T. (2017) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.08.001 · Cited by 39
Eating less or more – Mindset induced changes in neural correlates of pre-meal planning
Hege, M. A., Veit, R., Krumsiek, J., Kullmann, S., Heni, M., Rogers, P. J., Brunstrom, J. M., Fritsche, A., & Preissl, H. T. (2018) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2018.03.006 · Cited by 39
Uncovering the computational mechanisms underlying many-alternative choice
Thomas, A. W., Molter, F., & Krajbich, I. M. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.57012 · Cited by 47
Eye-tracking study of public acceptance of 5G base stations in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
Fu, H., Zhu, H. M., Xue, P., Hu, X., Guo, X., & Liu, B. (2022) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-10-2021-0946 · Cited by 38
Liberman, L., & Dubovi, I. (2022) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12763 · Cited by 51
Capturing Initial Gaze Attraction in Branded Spaces Through VR Eye-Tracking Technology
Kim, N. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2351717 · Cited by 38
Mechanisms of Choice Behavior Shift Using Cue-approach Training
Bakkour, A., Leuker, C., Hover, A. M., Giles, N., Poldrack, R. A., & Schönberg, T. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00421 · Cited by 38
Knoll, J., Matthes, J., Münch, A., & Ostermann, M. (2016) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2016.1213062 · Cited by 38
Bianco, T. D., Mason, L., Charman, T., Tillmann, J., Loth, E., Hayward, H., Shic, F., Buitelaar, J. K., Johnson, M. H., Jones, E. J. H., et al. (2020) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.09.004 · Cited by 42
Attentional modulation of the mere exposure effect.
Yagi, Y., Ikoma, S., & Kikuchi, T. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0017396 · Cited by 38
Hummel, G., Zerweck, I. A., Ehret, J., Winter, S. S., & Stroebele‐Benschop, N. (2017) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.07.003 · Cited by 37
Attentional Selection Mediates Framing and Risk-Bias Effects
Glickman, M., Tsetsos, K., & Usher, M. (2018) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797618803643 · Cited by 35
Gain-Loss Framing in Interdependent Choice
Fiedler, S., & Hillenbrand, A. (2018) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2020.02.008 · Cited by 39
Scarpi, D., Pizzi, G., & Raggiotto, F. (2019) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.03.006 · Cited by 37
Bae, M. (2019) · Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising · doi:10.1080/10641734.2019.1666071 · Cited by 40
Mitrovic, A., Tinio, P. P. L., & Leder, H. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00122 · Cited by 37
Attention Research in Marketing: A Review of Eye Tracking StudiesPreprint
Wedel, M. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2460289 · Cited by 38
The relationship between attention allocation and cheating
Pittarello, A., Motro, D., Rubaltelli, E., & Pluchino, P. (2015) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0935-z · Cited by 35
Tipper, S. P. (2010) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470211003624002 · Cited by 40
Attention Trajectories Capture Utility Accumulation and Predict Brand Choice
Martinovici, A., Pieters, R. G. M., & Erdem, T. (2022) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/00222437221141052 · Cited by 39
Uncertainty in learning, choice, and visual fixation
Stojić, H., Orquin, J. L., Dayan, P., Dolan, R. J., & Speekenbrink, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1911348117 · Cited by 34
Understanding the role of visual attention on wines’ purchase intention: an eye-tracking study
Monteiro, P., Guerreiro, J., & Loureiro, S. M. C. (2019) · International Journal of Wine Business Research · doi:10.1108/ijwbr-03-2019-0017 · Cited by 36
A Neural Pathway for Nonreinforced Preference Change
Schönberg, T., & Katz, L. N. (2020) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.04.002 · Cited by 36
The sensory valuation account of aesthetic experience
Nadal, M., & Skov, M. (2024) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-024-00385-y · Cited by 42
Attention! Can choices for low value food over high value food be trained?
Zoltak, M. J., Veling, H., Chen, Z., & Holland, R. W. (2017) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.06.010 · Cited by 34
Using Variable Dwell Time to Accelerate Gaze-Based Web Browsing with Two-Step Selection
Chen, Z., & Shi, B. E. (2018) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1452351 · Cited by 33
Value-based decision making: An interactive activation perspective.
Suri, G., Gross, J. J., & McClelland, J. L. (2019) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000164 · Cited by 39
I Choose, Therefore I Like: Preference for Faces Induced by Arbitrary Choice
Nakamura, K., & Kawabata, H. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072071 · Cited by 33
Is Beauty in the Face of the Beholder?
Laeng, B., Vermeer, O., & Sulutvedt, U. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068395 · Cited by 33
Mostafa, M. M. (2012) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.04.003 · Cited by 33
The role of attention in explaining the no-go devaluation effect: Effects on appetitive food items.
Quandt, J., Holland, R. W., Chen, Z., & Veling, H. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000659 · Cited by 33
What I see is what I want: Top-down attention biasing choice behavior
Vriens, M., Vidden, C., & Schomaker, J. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.001 · Cited by 36
Mitrovic, A., Hegelmaier, L. M., Leder, H., & Pelowski, M. J. (2020) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103133 · Cited by 32
Attraction comes from many sources: Attentional and comparative processes in decoy effects
Marini, M., Ansani, A., & Fabio Paglieri, A. (2020) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500007889 · Cited by 32
An uncertainty-based model of the effects of fixation on choice
Li, Z., & Ma, W. J. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009190 · Cited by 39
Saccade vigor reflects the rise of decision variables during deliberation
Korbisch, C. C., Apuan, D. R., Shadmehr, R., & Ahmed, A. A. (2022) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.10.053 · Cited by 32
Ashby, N. J. S., Jekel, M., Dickert, S., & Glöckner, A. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000279 · Cited by 32
The influence of facial blushing and paling on emotion perception and memory
Thorstenson, C. A., Pazda, A. D., & Krumhuber, E. G. (2021) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-021-09910-5 · Cited by 34
Preliminary study on the aesthetic preference for taillight shape design
Luo, S., Lin, H., Hu, Y., & Fang, C. (2021) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103240 · Cited by 31
Salience, transparency, and self-nudging: a digital nudge to promote healthier food product choices
Michels, L., Ochmann, J., Schmitt, K., Laumer, S., & Tiefenbeck, V. (2023) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2023.2229787 · Cited by 31
Gaze Shifts Do Not Affect Preference Judgments of Graphic Patterns
Nittono, H., & Wada, Y. (2009) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.109.1.79-94 · Cited by 31
Predicting Consumer's Behavior Using Eye Tracking Data
Goyal, S., Miyapuram, K. P., & Lahiri, U. (2015) · International Conference on Soft Computing & Machine Intelligence (ISCMI) · doi:10.1109/iscmi.2015.26 · Cited by 31
Gwinn, R., & Krajbich, I. M. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103892 · Cited by 30
Robust sampling of decision information during perceptual choice
Vandormael, H., Castañón, S. H., Balaguer, J., Li, V., & Summerfield, C. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1613950114 · Cited by 31
Mitsuda, T., & Glaholt, M. G. (2014) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2014.881447 · Cited by 30
The Art of Influencing Consumer Choices: A Reflection on Recent Advances in Decision Neuroscience
Bault, N., & Rusconi, E. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03009 · Cited by 30
Autistic differences in the temporal dynamics of social attention
Hedger, N., & Chakrabarti, B. (2021) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361321998573 · Cited by 31
Kurniawan, I. T., Grueschow, M., & Ruff, C. C. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3027-20.2021 · Cited by 28
Using facial EMG and eye tracking to study integral affect in discrete choice experiments
Rasch, C., Louviere, J. J., & Teichert, T. (2015) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2015.04.001 · Cited by 33
One is not enough: Group size modulates social gaze-induced object desirability effects
Capozzi, F., Bayliss, A. P., Elena, M. R., & Becchio, C. (2014) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0717-z · Cited by 30
When observing gaze shifts of others enhances object desirability.
van der Weiden, A., Veling, H., & Aarts, H. (2010) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0020501 · Cited by 30
Barriers Block the Effect of Joint Attention on Working Memory: Perspective Taking Matters
Gregory, S. E. A., & Jackson, M. C. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000622 · Cited by 25
Eye movement analysis with switching hidden Markov models
Chuk, T., Chan, A. B., Shinsuke Shimojo, A., & Hsiao, J. H. (2019) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01298-y · Cited by 29
Nonparametric learning rules from bandit experiments: The eyes have it!
Hu, Y., Kayaba, Y., & Shum, M. (2013) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2013.05.003 · Cited by 29
Nakamura, K., & Kawabata, H. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00654 · Cited by 29
Endogenous formation of preferences: Choices systematically change willingness-to-pay for goods.
Voigt, K., Murawski, C., & Bode, S. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000415 · Cited by 30
Medial Frontal Cortex Activity Predicts Information Sampling in Economic Choice
Kaanders, P., Nili, H., O'Reilly, J. X., & Hunt, L. (2021) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0392-21.2021 · Cited by 27
Eye Tracking as a Tool for Examining Cognitive Processes
Beesley, T., Pearson, D., & Pelley, M. E. L. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813092-6.00002-2 · Cited by 31
Brain Informatics-Based Big Data and the Wisdom Web of Things
Zhong, N., Yau, S. S., Ma, J., Shinsuke Shimojo, A., Just, M. A., Hu, B., Wang, G., Oiwa, K., & Anzai, Y. (2015) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2015.83 · Cited by 28
Computational Models of Facial Attractiveness Judgments
Bronstad, P. M., Langlois, J. H., & Russell, R. P. (2008) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p5805 · Cited by 29
Sugano, Y., Ozaki, Y., Kasai, H., Ogaki, K., & Sato, Y. (2014) · Journal of Eye Movement Research · doi:10.16910/jemr.7.3.5 · Cited by 28
Salience-Driven Value Construction for Adaptive Choice under Risk
Spitmaan, M., Chu, E. K., & Soltani, A. (2019) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2522-18.2019 · Cited by 24
Only your eyes tell me what you like: Exploring the liking effect induced by other's gaze
Ulloa, J. L., Marchetti, C., Taffou, M., & George, N. (2014) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2014.919899 · Cited by 27
Bieleke, M., Dohmen, D., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103896 · Cited by 25
How Information Availability Interacts with Visual Attention during Judgment and Decision Tasks
Pärnamets, P., Johansson, R., Gidlöf, K., & Wallin, A. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1902 · Cited by 27
“Your Choice” Motivates You in the Brain: The Emergence of Autonomy Neuroscience
Murayama, K., Izuma, K., Aoki, R., & Matsumoto, K. (2016) · Advances in motivation and achievement · doi:10.1108/s0749-742320160000019004 · Cited by 32
Kim, S. H., Hwang, S., Hong, Y.-J., Kim, J., Kim, K., & Chung, C. J. (2018) · The Angle Orthodontist · doi:10.2319/080717-528.1 · Cited by 27
Facial attractiveness: Variation, adaptiveness and consequences of facial preferences
Kościński, K. (2008) · Anthropological Review · doi:10.2478/v10044-008-0012-6 · Cited by 27
Lyons, M. T., Marcinkowska, U. M., Moisey, V., & Harrison, N. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.025 · Cited by 26
Eye Movements During Search and Choice
van der Lans, R., & Wedel, M. (2017) · International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56941-3_11 · Cited by 26
The influence of gaze direction on food preferences
Madipakkam, A. R., Bellucci, G., Rothkirch, M., & Park, S. Q. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-41815-9 · Cited by 26
Rubaltelli, E., Dickert, S., & Slovic, P. (2012) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s193029750000276x · Cited by 25
How the Eyes Tell Lies: Social Gaze During a Preference Task
Foulsham, T., & Lock, M. (2014) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12211 · Cited by 27
Predicting destination using head orientation and gaze direction during locomotion in VR
Gandrud, J., & Interrante, V. L. (2016) · ACM Symposium on Applied Perception · doi:10.1145/2931002.2931010 · Cited by 26
Individual differences in responsivity to social rewards: Insights from two eye-tracking tasks
Chakrabarti, B., Haffey, A., Canzano, L., Taylor, C. P., & McSorley, E. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0185146 · Cited by 23
Gazing Behavior During Mixed-Sex Interactions: Sex and Attractiveness Effects
van Straaten, I., Holland, R. W., Finkenauer, C., Hollenstein, T., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2009) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9482-x · Cited by 27
Chan, H., Boksem, M. A. S., Venkatraman, V., Dietvorst, R. C., Scholz, C., Vo, K. D., Falk, E. B., & Smidts, A. (2023) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/00222437231194319 · Cited by 34
Evaluative Processing of Food Images: A Conditional Role for Viewing in Preference Formation
Wolf, A., Ounjai, K., Takahashi, M., Kobayashi, S., Matsuda, T., & Lauwereyns, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00936 · Cited by 27
Xiao, L., & Wang, S. (2022) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-07-2021-0477 · Cited by 25
Shifting the Prototype: Experience with Faces Influences Affective and Attractiveness Preferences
Principe, C. P., & Langlois, J. H. (2012) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2012.30.1.109 · Cited by 25
Face inversion increases attractiveness
Leder, H., Goller, J., Forster, M., Schlageter, L., & Paul, M. A. (2017) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.05.005 · Cited by 26
Selectivity of Face Aftereffects for Expressions and Anti-Expressions
Juricevic, I., & Webster, M. (2011) · Front. Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00004 · Cited by 28
The cognitive reality of morphomes. Evidence from Italian
Cappellaro, C., Dumrukcic, N., Fritz, I., Franzon, F., & Maiden, M. (2023) · Morphology · doi:10.1007/s11525-023-09419-2 · Cited by 9
Emergence of eye-tracking in architectural research: a review of studies 1976–2021
Aalto, P., & Steinert, M. (2024) · Architectural Science Review · doi:10.1080/00038628.2024.2382796 · Cited by 24
Modeling Eye Movements and Response Times in Consumer Choice
Krajbich, I. M., & Smith, S. M. (2015) · Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization · doi:10.1515/jafio-2015-0016 · Cited by 26
Marquardt, K., Ramezanpour, H., Dicke, P. W., & Thier, P. (2017) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0317-16.2017 · Cited by 24
Empathy modulates the temporal structure of social attention
Hedger, N., Haffey, A., McSorley, E., & Chakrabarti, B. (2018) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.1716 · Cited by 22
Exploiting the dynamics of eye gaze to bias intertemporal choice
Liu, H., Lyu, X., Wei, Z., Mo, W., Luo, J., & Su, X. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2219 · Cited by 24
The influence of audience characteristics on the effectiveness of brand placement memory
Natarajan, T., Balasubramanian, S. A., Stephen, G., Jublee, D. I., & Kasilingam, D. L. (2018) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.06.008 · Cited by 23
Cognitive Diversity: A Measurement of Dissimilarity Between Multiple Scoring Systems
Hsu, D. F., Kristal, B. S., Hao, Y., & Schweikert, C. (2019) · Journal of Interconnection Networks · doi:10.1142/s0219265919400012 · Cited by 23
This way, please: Uncovering the directional effects of attribute translations on decision making
Mertens, S., Hahnel, U. J. J., & Brosch, T. (2020) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500006896 · Cited by 25
Shi, Y., Zhang, J., Shen, X., Chen, L., Xu, Y., Fu, R., Su, Y., & Xia, Y. (2022) · Land · doi:10.3390/land11101860 · Cited by 23
Beauty and cuteness in peripheral vision
Kuraguchi, K., & Ashida, H. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00566 · Cited by 23
Adaptation reinforces preferences for correlates of attractive facial cues
Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Little, A. C. (2008) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506280701760811 · Cited by 23
Cheng, S., & Dey, A. K. (2019) · CCF Transactions on Pervasive Computing and Interaction · doi:10.1007/s42486-019-00019-w · Cited by 23
The structure of species discrimination signals across a primate radiation
Winters, S., Allen, W. L., & Higham, J. P. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.47428 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Shimojo, S., Simion, C., Shimojo, E., & Scheier, C.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Bunkyo Gakuin University (JP)
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2003-11-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1317-1322
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- OpenAlex
- W2115276604
- Cited by
- 924
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 58 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
- Keywords
- gaze bias, cascading effects, preference formation, facial attractiveness, orienting, gaze duration, positive feedback loop, visual attention
- MeSH terms
- Choice Behavior, Discrimination, Psychological, Emotions, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Statistics, Nonparametric
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review