Cited by 221Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Activity-dependent regulation of inhibitory synaptic transmission in hippocampal neurons

Hartman, Kenichi N, Pal, Sumon K, Burrone, Juan, Murthy, Venkatesh N·2006·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Neural activity regulates the number and properties of GABAergic synapses in the brain, but the mechanisms underlying these changes are unclear. We found that blocking spike activity globally in developing hippocampal neurons from rats reduced the density of GABAergic terminals as well as the frequency and amplitude of miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs). Chronic inactivity later in development led to a reduction in the mIPSC amplitude, without any change in GABAergic synapse density. By contrast, hyperpolarizing or abolishing spike activity in single neurons did not alter GABAergic synaptic inputs. Suppressing activity in individual presynaptic GABAergic neurons also failed to decrease synaptic output. Our results indicate that GABAergic synapses are regulated by the level of activity in surrounding neurons. Notably, we found that the expression of GABAergic plasticity involves changes in the amount of neurotransmitter in individual vesicles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn1677

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scaling of inhibitory synapses cannot be induced by hyperpolarization of individual presynaptic or postsynaptic neurons.

    “Consistent with the idea that inhibitory scaling might result from release of a secreted factor during changes in network activity, scaling of inhibitory synapses cannot be induced by hyperpolarization of individual presynaptic or postsynaptic neurons (Hartman et al. 2006).”
  • Homeostatic regulation of inhibition involves coordinated changes in postsynaptic strength, synapse number, and likely presynaptic release probability.

    “Interestingly, both in vitro and in vivo studies have documented that homeostatic regulation of inhibition involves coordinated changes in postsynaptic strength, synapse number, and likely presynaptic release probability (Kilman et al. 2002;Maffei et al. 2004;Hartman et al. 2006).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hartman, K. N., Pal, S. K., Burrone, J., & Murthy, V. N.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Murthy, Venkatesh N
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2006-04-02
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
642-649
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2156087438
Cited by
221
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
activity-dependent synaptic plasticity, GABAergic synapses, synaptic inhibition, miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents, hippocampal neurons, synaptic density, presynaptic inhibition, neuronal activity regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Carrier Proteins, Cells, Cultured, Drug Interactions, Electric Stimulation, Glutamate Decarboxylase, Hippocampus, Isoenzymes, Membrane Potentials, Membrane Proteins, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Neural Inhibition, Synaptic Transmission, Neurons, Phosphinic Acids, Pyridines, Tetrodotoxin, Transfection, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Potassium Channels, Inwardly Rectifying, Vesicular Glutamate Transport Protein 1, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review