Cited by 580Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Separate neural pathways process different decision costs

Rudebeck, Peter H, Walton, Mark E, Smyth, Angharad N, Bannerman, David M, Rushworth, Matthew F S·2006·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Behavioral ecologists and economists emphasize that potential costs, as well as rewards, influence decision making. Although neuroscientists assume that frontal areas are central to decision making, the evidence is contradictory and the critical region remains unclear. Here it is shown that frontal lobe contributions to cost-benefit decision making can be understood by positing the existence of two independent systems that make decisions about delay and effort costs. Anterior cingulate cortex lesions affected how much effort rats decided to invest for rewards. Orbitofrontal cortical lesions affected how long rats decided to wait for rewards. The pattern of disruption suggested the deficit could be related to impaired associative learning. Impairments of the two systems may underlie apathetic and impulsive choice patterns in neurological and psychiatric illnesses. Although the existence of two systems is not predicted by economic accounts of decision making, our results suggest that delay and effort may exert distinct influences on decision making.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn1756

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 52 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–578 of 578

Metadata

Authors
Rudebeck, P. H., Walton, M. E., Smyth, A. N., Bannerman, D. M., & Rushworth, M. F. S.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Rudebeck, Peter H
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2006-08-20
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
1161-1168
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2136906168
Cited by
580
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 27
FWCI
13.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (087736)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
cost-benefit decision making, delay cost, effort cost, anterior cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, frontal lobe lesions, rats, associative learning, impulsive choice, apathy
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Choice Behavior, Frontal Lobe, Learning Disabilities, Male, Motor Activity, Neural Pathways, Reaction Time, Reward, Maze Learning, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review