Cited by 1,004Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMotor Control and Adaptation

Action sets and decisions in the medial frontal cortex

RUSHWORTH, M, WALTON, M, KENNERLEY, S, BANNERMAN, D·2004·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Activations in human dorsomedial frontal and cingulate cortices are often present in neuroimaging studies of decision making and action selection. Interpretations have emphasized executive control, movement sequencing, error detection and conflict monitoring. Recently, however, experimental approaches, using lesions, inactivation, and cell recording, have suggested that these are just components of the areas' functions. Here we review these results and integrate them with those from neuroimaging. A medial superior frontal gyrus (SFG) region centred on the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) is involved in the selection of action sets whereas the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) has a fundamental role in relating actions to their consequences, both positive reinforcement outcomes and errors, and in guiding decisions about which actions are worth making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.009

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The macaque anterior cingulate cortex helps in monitoring and reacting to particular forms of conflict.

    “From this and related findings (Kennerley et al., 2006; Rushworth et al., 2004), it was proposed that the macaque anterior cingulate cortex helps in monitoring and reacting to particular forms of conflict”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Rushworth et al., 2004

  • Cingulate projections may be involved in the maintenance and cortical integration of information from limbic structures, including conflict between the current status and perceived indicators of change.

    “Reflecting these roles, cingulate projections may be involved in the maintenance and cortical integration of information from limbic structures, which includes conflict between the current status and perceived indicators of change (Mansouri et al., 2017; Rushworth et al., 2004).”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Rushworth et al., 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
RUSHWORTH, M., WALTON, M., KENNERLEY, S., & BANNERMAN, D.
Affiliations
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
RUSHWORTH, M
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-09
Volume
8
Issue
9
Pages
410-417
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995810302
Cited by
1,004
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 69
FWCI
30.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (087736)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
action sets, decision-making, action selection, medial frontal cortex, dorsomedial frontal cortex, cingulate cortex, pre-supplementary motor area, anterior cingulate cortex, medial superior frontal gyrus, error detection, conflict monitoring, executive function, movement sequencing, reinforcement learning
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Conditioning, Psychological, Cues, Decision Making, Evoked Potentials, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Psychomotor Performance, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reward, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review