The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantification of the affinities and kinetics of protein interactions using silicon nanowire biosensors
Open accessAbstract
Monitoring the binding affinities and kinetics of protein interactions is important in clinical diagnostics and drug development because such information is used to identify new therapeutic candidates. Surface plasmon resonance is at present the standard method used for such analysis, but this is limited by low sensitivity and low-throughput analysis. Here, we show that silicon nanowire field-effect transistors can be used as biosensors to measure protein–ligand binding affinities and kinetics with sensitivities down to femtomolar concentrations. Based on this sensing mechanism, we develop an analytical model to calibrate the sensor response and quantify the molecular binding affinities of two representative protein–ligand binding pairs. The rate constant of the association and dissociation of the protein–ligand pair is determined by monitoring the reaction kinetics, demonstrating that silicon nanowire field-effect transistors can be readily used as high-throughput biosensors to quantify protein interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tian, J., Avalos, A. M., Mao, S.-Y., Chen, B., Senthil, K., Wu, H., Parroche, P., Drabic, S., Golenbock, D., Sirois, C., et al. (2007) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni1457 · Cited by 1,372
Label-free immunodetection with CMOS-compatible semiconducting nanowires
Stern, E., Klemic, J. F., Routenberg, D. A., Wyrembak, P. N., Turner-Evans, D. B., Hamilton, A. D., LaVan, D. A., Fahmy, T. M., & Reed, M. A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05498 · Cited by 1,352
Self-citationImportance of the Debye Screening Length on Nanowire Field Effect Transistor Sensors
Stern, E., Wagner, R., Sigworth, F. J., Breaker, R., Fahmy, T. M., & Reed, M. A. (2007) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl071792z · Cited by 806
Self-citationBiosensors for real-time in vivo measurements
Wilson, G. S., & Gifford, R. (2005) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2004.12.003 · Cited by 660
Cited by
Biosensors based on nanomechanical systems
Tamayo, J., Kosaka, P. M., Ruz, J. J., San Paulo, Á., & Calleja, M. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c2cs35293a · Cited by 391
Fang, H., Yu, K. J., Gloschat, C., Yang, Z., Song, E., Chiang, C.-H., Zhao, J., Won, S. M., Xu, S., Trumpis, M., et al. (2017) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-017-0038 · Cited by 278
Artificial sensing intelligence with silicon nanowires for ultraselective detection in the gas phase
Wang, B., Cancilla, J. C., Torrecilla, J. S., & Haick, H. (2014) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl404335p · Cited by 236
Metadata
- Authors
- Duan, X., Li, Y., Rajan, N. K., Routenberg, D. A., Modis, Y., & Reed, M. A.
- Venue
- Nature Nanotechnology
- Published
- 2012-05-27
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 401-407
- ISSN
- 1748-3387 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-3395
- OpenAlex
- W2058957939
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 16.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification of the affinities and kinetics of protein interactions using silicon nanowire biosensors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nnano.2012.82
- The paper
- Duan, X., Li, Y., Rajan, N. K., Routenberg, D. A., Modis, Y., & Reed, M. A. (2012). Quantification of the affinities and kinetics of protein interactions using silicon nanowire biosensors. Nature Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.82
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.