CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 156

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental demonstration of a quantum key distribution without signal disturbance monitoring

Wang, Shuang, Yin, Zhen-Qiang, Chen, Wei, He, De-Yong, Song, Xiao-Tian, Li, Hong-Wei, Zhang, Li-Jun, Zhou, Zheng, Guo, Guang-Can, Han, Zheng-Fu·2015·Nature Photonics
DOI 10.1038/nphoton.2015.209
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphoton.2015.209

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several specific quantum optical implementations rely on the HOM effect, including solving systems of linear equations, computation on encrypted data, computing discrete and fractional Fourier transform, and computations on a single spatial mode using temporal modes.

    “There are several examples of specific quantum optical implementations that rely on the HOM effect, to list a few: solving systems of linear equations [128,129], computation on encrypted data [130], computing discrete and fractional Fourier transform [131], and computations on a single spatial mode (using temporal modes) [132].”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [131]

    The citation is attached to the claim about solving systems of linear equations. The paper’s discussion of its variable-delay interferometer for quantum key distribution does not address that computation or connect it to the HOM effect. Searches for linear equations and HOM interference found no supporting passage in our copy (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Bennett, C. H. & Brassard, G. in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing 175–179 (IEEE, 1984).
  2. Stucki, D., Gisin, N., Guinnard, O., Ribordy, G. & Zbinden, H. Quantum key distribution over 67 km with a plug&play system. New J. Phys. 4, 41 (2002). · DOI
  3. Takesue, H. et al. Quantum key distribution over a 40-dB channel loss using superconducting single-photon detectors. Nature Photon. 1, 343–348 (2007). · DOI
  4. Wang, S. et al. 2 GHz clock quantum key distribution over 260 km of standard telecom fiber. Opt. Lett. 37, 1008–1010 (2012). · DOI
  5. Korzh, B. et al. Provably secure and practical quantum key distribution over 307 km of optical fibre. Nature Photon. 9, 163–168 (2015). · DOI
  6. Dixon, A., Yuan, Z., Dynes, J., Sharpe, A. & Shields, A. Gigahertz decoy quantum key distribution with 1 Mbit/s secure key rate. Opt. Express 16, 18790–18797 (2008). · DOI
  7. Dixon, A. et al. High speed prototype quantum key distribution system and long term field trial. Opt. Express 23, 7583–7592 (2015). · DOI
  8. Jouguet, P., Kunz-Jacques, S., Leverrier, A., Grangier, P. & Diamanti, E. Experimental demonstration of long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution. Nature Photon. 7, 378–381 (2013). · DOI
  9. Rubenok, A., Slater, J. A., Chan, P., Lucio-Martinez, I. & Tittel, W. Real-world two-photon interference and proof-of-principle quantum key distribution immune to detector attacks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 130501 (2013). · DOI
  10. Tang, Z. et al. Experimental demonstration of polarization encoding measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 190503 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Peev, M. et al. The SECOQC quantum key distribution network in Vienna. New J. Phys. 11, 075001 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Sasaki, M. et al. Field test of quantum key distribution in the Tokyo QKD network. Opt. Express 19, 10387–10409 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Wang, S. et al. Field and long-term demonstration of a wide area quantum key distribution network. Opt. Express 22, 21739–21756 (2014). · DOI
  14. Frolich, B. et al. A quantum access network. Nature 501, 69–72 (2013). · DOI
  15. Lo, H.-K., Curty, M. & Tamaki, K. Secure quantum key distribution. Nature Photon. 8, 595–604 (2014). · DOI
  16. Scarani, V. et al. The security of practical quantum key distribution. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1301–1350 (2009). · DOI
  17. Sasaki, T., Yamamoto, Y. & Koashi, M. Practical quantum key distribution protocol without monitoring signal disturbance. Nature 509, 475–478 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Deutsch, D. et al. Quantum privacy amplification and the security of quantum cryptography over noisy channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2818 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Zhang, C. M. et al. Delayed error verification in quantum key distribution. Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 2825–2828 (2014). · DOI
  20. Pawlowski, M. et al. Information causality as a physical principle. Nature 461, 1101–1104 (2009). · DOI
  21. Zhao, Y., Qi, B. & Lo, H.-K. Experimental quantum key distribution with active phase randomization. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 044106 (2007). · DOI
  22. Mo, X.-F., Zhu, B., Han, Z.-F., Gui, Y.-Z. & Guo, G.-C. Faraday–Michelson system for quantum cryptography. Opt. Lett. 30, 2632–2634 (2005). · DOI
  23. Ma, L. et al. 1310 nm differential-phase-shift QKD system using superconducting single-photon detectors. New J. Phys. 11, 045020 (2009). · DOI
  24. Walenta, N. et al. Sine gating detector with simple filtering for low-noise infra-red single photon detection at room temperature. J. Appl. Phys. 112, 063106 (2012). · DOI
  25. Yuan, Z., Dixon, A., Dynes, J., Sharpe, A. & Shields, A. Gigahertz quantum key distribution with InGaAs avalanche photodiodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 201104 (2008). · DOI
  26. Hwang, W.-Y. Quantum key distribution with high loss: toward global secure communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 057901 (2003). · DOI
  27. Wang, X.-B. Beating the photon-number-splitting attack in practical quantum cryptography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 230503 (2005). · DOI
  28. Lo, H.-K., Ma, X. & Chen, K. Decoy state quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 230504 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Zhang, C. M. et al. Decoy-state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with mismatched-basis statistics. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 58, 590301 (2015). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, S., Yin, Z.-Q., Chen, W., He, D.-Y., Song, X.-T., Li, H.-W., Zhang, L.-J., Zhou, Z., Guo, G.-C., & Han, Z.-F.
Venue
Nature Photonics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2015-11-02
Volume
9
Issue
12
Pages
832-836
ISSN
  • 1749-4885
  • 1749-4893
DOI
10.1038/nphoton.2015.209
Cited by
156
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review