Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 367

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unexpectedly large charge radii of neutron-rich calcium isotopes

Open access
Garcia Ruiz, R. F., Bissell, M. L., Blaum, K., Ekström, A., Frömmgen, N., Hagen, G., Hammen, M., Hebeler, K., Holt, J. D., Jansen, G. R., Kowalska, M., Kreim, K., Nazarewicz, W., Neugart, R., Neyens, G., Nörtershäuser, W., Papenbrock, T., Papuga, J., Schwenk, A., Simonis, J., Wendt, K. A., Yordanov, D. T.·2016·Nature Physics

Abstract

Despite being a complex many-body system, the atomic nucleus exhibits simple structures for certain ‘magic’ numbers of protons and neutrons. The calcium chain in particular is both unique and puzzling: evidence of doubly magic features are known in 40,48Ca, and recently suggested in two radioactive isotopes, 52,54Ca. Although many properties of experimentally known calcium isotopes have been successfully described by nuclear theory, it is still a challenge to predict the evolution of their charge radii. Here we present the first measurements of the charge radii of 49,51,52Ca, obtained from laser spectroscopy experiments at ISOLDE, CERN. The experimental results are complemented by state-of-the-art theoretical calculations. The large and unexpected increase of the size of the neutron-rich calcium isotopes beyond N = 28 challenges the doubly magic nature of 52Ca and opens new intriguing questions on the evolution of nuclear sizes away from stability, which are of importance for our understanding of neutron-rich atomic nuclei. Doubly magic atomic nuclei — having a magic number of both protons and neutrons — are very stable. Now, experiments revealing unexpectedly large charge radii for a series of Ca isotopes put the doubly magic nature of the 52Ca nucleus into question.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphys3645

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 367

Metadata

Authors
Garcia Ruiz, R. F., Bissell, M. L., Blaum, K., Ekström, A., Frömmgen, N., Hagen, G., Hammen, M., Hebeler, K., Holt, J. D., Jansen, G. R., Kowalska, M., Kreim, K., Nazarewicz, W., Neugart, R., Neyens, G., Nörtershäuser, W., Papenbrock, T., Papuga, J., Schwenk, A., Simonis, J., Wendt, K. A., & Yordanov, D. T.
Venue
Nature Physics
Published
2016-02-08
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
594-598
ISSN
  • 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2481
OpenAlex
W2269746030
Cited by
367
References
22
FWCI
19.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.