Cited by 25Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Double dissociation of monoacylglycerol lipase inhibition and CB1 antagonism in the central amygdala, basolateral amygdala, and the interoceptive insular cortex on the affective properties of acute naloxone-precipitated morphine withdrawal in rats

Open access
Wills, Kiri L, Petrie, Gavin N, Millett, Geneva, Limebeer, Cheryl L, Rock, Erin M, Niphakis, Micah J, Cravatt, Benjamin F, Parker, Linda A·2016·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Both CB1 receptor antagonism and agonism, in particular by 2-arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG), have been shown to reduce somatic symptoms of morphine withdrawal (MWD). Here we evaluated the effects of both systemic pretreatment with the monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) inhibitor MJN110 (which selectively elevates 2-AG) and central administration of both MJN110 and the CB1 antagonist (AM251) on the affective properties of MWD. Acute MWD induced place aversion occurs when naloxone is administered 24 h following a single exposure to a high dose of morphine. Systemic pretreatment with the MAGL inhibitor, MJN110, prevented the aversive effects of acute MWD by a CB1 receptor-dependent mechanism. Furthermore, in a double dissociation, AM251 infusions into the central amygdala, but MJN110 infusions into the basolateral amygdala, interfered with the naloxone-precipitated MWD induced place aversion. As well, MJN110, but not AM251, infusions into the interoceptive insular cortex (a region known to be activated in acute MWD) also prevented the establishment of the place aversion by a CB1 mechanism of action. These findings reveal the respective sites of action of systemically administered MJN110 and AM251 in regulating the aversive effects of MWD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npp.2015.356

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inhibition of monoacylglycerol lipase in the pGIC prevents the acquisition of CPA from morphine withdrawal, which was reversed by the blockade of cannabinoid-1 receptors.

    “The cannabinoid system has also been implicated, with the inhibition of monoacylglycerol lipase (causing elevation of the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonyl glycerol; 2-AG) in the pGIC preventing the acquisition of CPA from morphine withdrawal, which was reversed by the blockade of cannabinoid-1 receptors”

    From The Insula: A Brain Stimulation Target for the Treatment of Addiction (2019) · cites this paper as Wills et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wills, K. L., Petrie, G. N., Millett, G., Limebeer, C. L., Rock, E. M., Niphakis, M. J., Cravatt, B. F., & Parker, L. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Guelph (CA)
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Parker, Linda A
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2015-12-09
Volume
41
Issue
7
Pages
1865-1873
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2193535549
Cited by
25
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (137122)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (13712_2)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (92057)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA032933, R01DA033760, P01DA017259)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
monoacylglycerol lipase inhibition, CB1 receptor antagonism, AM251, 2-arachidonoylglycerol, morphine withdrawal, naloxone-precipitated withdrawal, place aversion, central amygdala, basolateral amygdala, endocannabinoid system, double dissociation
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Arachidonic Acids, Carbamates, Cerebral Cortex, Conditioning, Operant, Disease Models, Animal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Routes, Glycerides, Male, Monoacylglycerol Lipases, Morphine, Naloxone, Narcotic Antagonists, Narcotics, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Succinimides, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists, Endocannabinoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review