Cited by 1,137Computational Drug Discovery MethodsChemical Synthesis and AnalysisProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 172 of the 172 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Small molecules, big targets: drug discovery faces the protein–protein interaction challenge

Open access
Scott, Duncan E., Bayly, Andrew R., Abell, Chris, Skidmore, John·2016·Nature Reviews Drug Discovery

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are of pivotal importance in the regulation of biological systems and are consequently implicated in the development of disease states. Recent work has begun to show that, with the right tools, certain classes of PPI can yield to the efforts of medicinal chemists to develop inhibitors, and the first PPI inhibitors have reached clinical development. In this Review, we describe the research leading to these breakthroughs and highlight the existence of groups of structurally related PPIs within the PPI target class. For each of these groups, we use examples of successful discovery efforts to illustrate the research strategies that have proved most useful.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrd.2016.29

Cites

172 of 172 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 172 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 1,001

Metadata

Authors
Scott, D. E., Bayly, A. R., Abell, C., & Skidmore, J.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Abell, Chris
  • Skidmore, John
Venue
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Published
2016-04-11
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
533-550
ISSN
  • 1474-1776 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1784
OpenAlex
W2329592726
Cited by
1,137
References
172
Citations by year
2026: 101 · 2025: 121 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 117 · 2021: 128 · 2020: 120 · 2019: 106 · 2018: 107 · 2017: 83 · 2016: 16
FWCI
8.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, PPI inhibitors, small molecule drug discovery, drug target identification, structure-based drug design
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Models, Molecular, Proteins, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Computational Biology, Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs, Small Molecule Libraries, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review