Cited by 411Gastrointestinal motility and disordersPelvic floor disorders treatmentsCongenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies

Chronic constipation

Camilleri, Michael, Ford, Alexander C., Mawe, Gary M., Dinning, Phil G., Rao, Satish S., Chey, William D., Simrén, Magnus, Lembo, Anthony +2 more·2017·Nature Reviews Disease Primers

Abstract

Chronic constipation is a prevalent condition that severely impacts the quality of life of those affected. Several types of primary chronic constipation, which show substantial overlap, have been described, including normal-transit constipation, rectal evacuation disorders and slow-transit constipation. Diagnosis of primary chronic constipation involves a multistep process initiated by the exclusion of 'alarm' features (for example, unintentional weight loss or rectal bleeding) that might indicate organic diseases (such as polyps or tumours) and a therapeutic trial with first-line treatments such as dietary changes, lifestyle modifications and over-the-counter laxatives. If symptoms do not improve, investigations to diagnose rectal evacuation disorders and slow-transit constipation are performed, such as digital rectal examination, anorectal structure and function testing (including the balloon expulsion test, anorectal manometry or defecography) or colonic transit tests (such as the radiopaque marker test, wireless motility capsule test, scintigraphy or colonic manometry). The mainstays of treatment are diet and lifestyle interventions, pharmacological therapy and, rarely, surgery. This Primer provides an introduction to the epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnosis, management and quality of life associated with the commonly encountered clinical problem of chronic constipation in adults unrelated to opioid abuse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrdp.2017.95

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Camilleri, M., Ford, A. C., Mawe, G. M., Dinning, P. G., Rao, S. S., Chey, W. D., Simrén, M., Lembo, A., Young-Fadok, T. M., & Chang, L.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • Augusta University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Camilleri, Michael
Venue
Nature Reviews Disease Primers
Published
2017-12-14
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
17095-17095
ISSN
2056-676X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210981417
Cited by
411
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 16
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Disease Primers (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies
Keywords
chronic constipation, slow transit constipation, anorectal manometry, defecography, laxatives, dietary and lifestyle interventions, pharmacotherapy, constipation surgery, quality of life, pathophysiology
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Constipation, Defecation, Humans, Rectal Diseases, Rectum, Sex Factors, Prevalence, Defecography, Digital Rectal Examination, Laxatives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review