Cited by 13,174Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsRNA Research and Splicing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics

Open access
Wang, Zhong, Gerstein, Mark, Snyder, Michael·2009·Nature Reviews Genetics

Abstract

RNA-Seq is a recently developed approach to transcriptome profiling that uses deep-sequencing technologies. Studies using this method have already altered our view of the extent and complexity of eukaryotic transcriptomes. RNA-Seq also provides a far more precise measurement of levels of transcripts and their isoforms than other methods. This article describes the RNA-Seq approach, the challenges associated with its application, and the advances made so far in characterizing several eukaryote transcriptomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrg2484

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 44 references

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 1,061

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Z., Gerstein, M., & Snyder, M.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Snyder, Michael
Venue
Nature Reviews Genetics
Published
2009-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
57-63
ISSN
  • 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0064
OpenAlex
W1981509058
Cited by
13,174
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 518 · 2025: 745 · 2024: 728 · 2023: 662 · 2022: 856 · 2021: 974 · 2020: 916 · 2019: 862 · 2018: 911 · 2017: 867 · 2016: 901 · 2015: 960 · 2014: 900 · 2013: 815 · 2012: 662
FWCI
22.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (P50HG002357)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA077808)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
Keywords
RNA-seq, transcriptomics, gene expression profiling, deep sequencing, mRNA isoforms, transcript quantification, next-generation sequencing
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Chromosome Mapping, Exons, Humans, Models, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Data, RNA, Transcription, Genetic, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review