Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 723

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The biogenesis of multivesicular endosomes

Open access
Gruenberg, Jean, Stenmark, Harald·2004·Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Abstract

Recent progress has been made in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms that regulate the biogenesis of multivesicular transport intermediates in the degradation pathway that leads to lysosomes. Here, we discuss recent work that uncovers some of the mechanisms that cause both membrane invagination within these newly forming intermediates and the detachment of these intermediates from early endosomal membranes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrm1360

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 723

Metadata

Authors
Gruenberg, J., & Stenmark, H.
Venue
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
Published
2004-04
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
317-323
ISSN
  • 1471-0072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0080
OpenAlex
W1843137073
Cited by
723
References
6
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The biogenesis of multivesicular endosomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nrm1360
The paper
Gruenberg, J., & Stenmark, H. (2004). The biogenesis of multivesicular endosomes. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1360

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.