Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,244

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pathways to zoonotic spillover

Open access
Plowright, Raina K., Parrish, Colin R., McCallum, Hamish, Hudson, Peter J., Ko, Albert I., Graham, Andrea L., Lloyd-Smith, James O.·2017·Nature Reviews Microbiology

Abstract

Zoonotic spillover, which is the transmission of a pathogen from a vertebrate animal to a human, presents a global public health burden but is a poorly understood phenomenon. Zoonotic spillover requires several factors to align, including the ecological, epidemiological and behavioural determinants of pathogen exposure, and the within-human factors that affect susceptibility to infection. In this Opinion article, we propose a synthetic framework for animal-to-human transmission that integrates the relevant mechanisms. This framework reveals that all zoonotic pathogens must overcome a hierarchical series of barriers to cause spillover infections in humans. Understanding how these barriers are functionally and quantitatively linked, and how they interact in space and time, will substantially improve our ability to predict or prevent spillover events. This work provides a foundation for transdisciplinary investigation of spillover and synthetic theory on zoonotic transmission.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.45

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 100 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Thoen, C. O., Steele, J. H. & Kaneene, J. B. Zoonotic Tuberculosis: Mycobacterium bovis and Other Pathogenic Mycobacteria (John Wiley & Sons, 2014). · doi:10.1002/9781118474310
  2. Monahan, A. M., Callanan, J. J. & Nally, J. E. Proteomic analysis of Leptospira interrogans shed in urine of chronically infected hosts. Infect. Immun. 76, 4952–4958 (2008). · doi:10.1128/iai.00511-08
  3. Nally, J. E., Chow, E., Fishbein, M. C., Blanco, D. R. & Lovett, M. A. Changes in lipopolysaccharide O antigen distinguish acute versus chronic Leptospira interrogans infections. Infect. Immun. 73, 3251–3260 (2005). · doi:10.1128/iai.73.6.3251-3260.2005
  4. Andre-Fontaine, G., Aviat, F. & Thorin, C. Waterborne leptospirosis: survival and preservation of the virulence of pathogenic Leptospira spp. in fresh water. Curr. Microbiol. 71, 136–142 (2015). · doi:10.1007/s00284-015-0836-4
  5. Phraisuwan, P. et al. Leptospirosis: skin wounds and control strategies, Thailand, 1999. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8, 1455–1459 (2002). · doi:10.3201/eid0812.020180
  6. Spencer, S. E., Besser, T. E., Cobbold, R. N. & French, N. P. 'Super'or just 'above average'? Supershedders and the transmission of Escherichia coli O157: H7 among feedlot cattle. J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 0446 (2015). This study examines the dynamics of E. coli transmission and the roles of super-shedder individuals in those processes. · doi:10.1098/rsif.2015.0446
  7. Hancock, D., Besser, T., Rice, D., Herriott, D. & Tarr, P. A longitudinal study of Escherichia coli O157 in fourteen cattle herds. Epidemiol. Infect. 118, 193–195 (1997). · doi:10.1017/s0950268896007212
  8. Besser, T. E., Davis, M. A. & Walk, S. T. in Population Genetics of Bacteria: A Tribute to Thomas S. Whittam (eds Walk, S. T. & Feng, P. C. H.) 303–324 (2011).
  9. Brachman, P. S. & Fekety, F. R. Industrial anthrax. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 70, 574–584 (1958). · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1958.tb35413.x
  10. Brachman, P. S., Kaufman, A. & Dalldorf, F. G. Industrial inhalation anthrax. Bacteriol. Rev. 30, 646 (1966). This study is one of the only studies to calculate the risk of spillover infection using comparable doses administered over time and provides evidence for the outcome of repeated low-dose versus single high-dose exposure. · doi:10.1128/br.30.3.646-659.1966
  11. Coleman, M. E., Thran, B., Morse, S. S., Hugh-Jones, M. & Massulik, S. Inhalation anthrax: dose response and risk analysis. Biosecur. Bioterror. 6, 147–160 (2008). · doi:10.1089/bsp.2007.0066
  12. Pujol, J. M., Eisenberg, J. E., Haas, C. N. & Koopman, J. S. The effect of ongoing exposure dynamics in dose response relationships. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000399 (2009). · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000399
  13. Reymond, D. et al. Neutralizing antibodies to Escherichia coli vero cytotoxin 1 and antibodies to O157 lipopolysaccharide in healthy farm family members and urban residents. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34, 2053–2057 (1996). · doi:10.1128/jcm.34.9.2053-2057.1996
  14. Cohen, M. L. & Whalen, T. Implications of low level human exposure to respirable B. anthracis. Appl. Biosafety 12, 109 (2007). · doi:10.1177/153567600701200207
  15. French, N., Kelly, L., Jones, R. & Clancy, D. Dose–response relationships for foot and mouth disease in cattle and sheep. Epidemiol. Infect. 128, 325–332 (2002). · doi:10.1017/s0950268801006446
  16. Miller, R. H. et al. Ecological niche modeling to estimate the distribution of Japanese encephalitis virus in Asia. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 6, e1678 (2012). · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001678
  17. Levine, R. S. et al. Ecological niche and geographic distribution of human monkeypox in Africa. PLoS ONE 2, e176 (2007). · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000176
  18. Hutin, Y. et al. Outbreak of human monkeypox, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1996 to 1997. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7, 434 (2001). · doi:10.3201/eid0703.017311
  19. Kieft, R. et al. Mechanism of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense (group 1) resistance to human trypanosome lytic factor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16137–16141 (2010). · doi:10.1073/pnas.1007074107
  20. Jezek, Z. & Fenner, F. in Monographs in Virology Vol. 17 (ed. Melnick, J. L. ) 119–121 (Karger, 1988).
  21. Silva, É. F. et al. Characterization of virulence of Leptospira isolates in a hamster model. Vaccine 26, 3892–3896 (2008). · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.04.085
  22. Prescott, J. et al. Postmortem stability of Ebola virus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 21, 856 (2015). · doi:10.3201/eid2105.150041

Cited by

See all 1,244

Metadata

Authors
Plowright, R. K., Parrish, C. R., McCallum, H., Hudson, P. J., Ko, A. I., Graham, A. L., & Lloyd-Smith, J. O.
Venue
Nature Reviews Microbiology
Published
2017-05-30
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
502-510
ISSN
  • 1740-1526 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-1534
OpenAlex
W2618653913
Cited by
1,244
References
100
FWCI
11.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathways to zoonotic spillover. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nrmicro.2017.45
The paper
Plowright, R. K., Parrish, C. R., McCallum, H., Hudson, P. J., Ko, A. I., Graham, A. L., & Lloyd-Smith, J. O. (2017). Pathways to zoonotic spillover. Nature Reviews Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2017.45

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.