CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 948Face Recognition and PerceptionFace recognition and analysisEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression

Calder, Andrew J., Young, Andrew W.·2005·Nature Reviews Neuroscience
DOI 10.1038/nrn1724
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Faces convey a wealth of social signals. A dominant view in face-perception research has been that the recognition of facial identity and facial expression involves separable visual pathways at the functional and neural levels, and data from experimental, neuropsychological, functional imaging and cell-recording studies are commonly interpreted within this framework. However, the existing evidence supports this model less strongly than is often assumed. Alongside this two-pathway framework, other possible models of facial identity and expression recognition, including one that has emerged from principal component analysis techniques, should be considered.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn1724

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 113

  1. Bruce, V. & Young, A. W. Understanding face recognition. Br. J. Psychol. 77, 305–327 (1986). A theoretical paper that proposes a multiroute model of face perception in which different facial attributes are processed by distinct functional routes. · DOI
  2. Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A. & Gobbini, M. I. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 223–233 (2000). Presents a neural model of face perception that comprises 'core' and 'extended' systems. The core system differentiates mechanisms for coding changeable facial properties and mechanisms coding invariant facial properties. The extended system includes neural regions that are involved in semantics, language, emotion and attention, which support the recognition of different facial characteristics. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bruce, V. Influences of familiarity on the processing of faces. Perception 15, 387–397 (1986). · DOI
  4. Campbell, R., Brooks, B., de Haan, E. & Roberts, T. Dissociating face processing skills: decisions about lip-read speech, expression and identity. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 49A, 295–314 (1996). · DOI
  5. Young, A. W., McWeeny, K. H., Hay, D. C. & Ellis, A. W. Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on identity and expression. Psychol. Res. 48, 63–68 (1986). · DOI
  6. Calder, A. J., Young, A. W., Keane, J. & Dean, M. Configural information in facial expression perception. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 26, 527–551 (2000). · DOI
  7. Etcoff, N. L. Selective attention to facial identity and facial emotion. Neuropsychologia 22, 281–295 (1984). · DOI
  8. Young, A. W., Newcombe, F., de Haan, E. H. F., Small, M. & Hay, D. C. Face perception after brain injury: selective impairments affecting identity and expression. Brain 116, 941–959 (1993). · DOI
  9. Bruyer, R. et al. A case of prosopagnosia with some preserved covert remembrance of familiar faces. Brain Cogn. 2, 257–284 (1983). · DOI
  10. Tranel, D., Damasio, A. R. & Damasio, H. Intact recognition of facial expression, gender, and age in patients with impaired recognition of face identity. Neurology 38, 690–696 (1988). · DOI
  11. Hornak, J., Rolls, E. T. & Wade, D. Face and voice expression identification in patients with emotion and behavioural changes following ventral frontal lobe damage. Neuropsychologia 34, 247–261 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hasselmo, M. E., Rolls, E. T. & Baylis, G. C. The role of expression and identity in face-selective responses of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey. Behav. Brain Res. 32, 203–218 (1989). · DOI · Paper page
  13. George, M. S. et al. Brain-regions involved in recognizing facial emotion or identity: an oxygen-15 PET study. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 5, 384–394 (1993). · DOI
  14. Sergent, J., Ohta, S., MacDonald, B. & Zuck, E. Segregated processing of identity and emotion in the human brain: a PET study. Vis. Cogn. 1, 349–369 (1994). · DOI
  15. Winston, J. S., Henson, R. N. A., Fine-Goulden, M. R. & Dolan, R. J. fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 1830–1839 (2004). · DOI
  16. Parry, F. M., Young, A. W., Saul, J. S. M. & Moss, A. Dissociable face processing impairments after brain injury. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 13, 545–558 (1990). · DOI
  17. Shuttleworth, E. C. J., Syring, V. & Allen, N. Further observations on the nature of prosopagnosia. Brain Cogn. 1, 307–322 (1982). · DOI
  18. Hanley, J. R., Pearson, N. & Young, A. W. Impaired memory for new visual forms. Brain 113, 1131–1148 (1990). Reports the first detailed case study of a patient who showed impaired learning of faces (prosopamnesia) and of visual forms in general after a brain injury. · DOI
  19. Tippet, L. J., Milller, L. A. & Farah, M. J. Prosopamnesia: a selective impairment in face learning. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 17, 241–255 (2000). · DOI
  20. Hanley, J. R., Young, A. W. & Pearson, N. Defective recognition of familiar people. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 6, 179–210 (1989). · DOI
  21. Evans, J. J., Heggs, A. J., Antoun, N. & Hodges, J. R. Progressive prosopagnosia associated with selective right temporal lobe atrophy: a new syndrome? Brain 118, 1–13 (1995). · DOI
  22. Ellis, A. W., Young, A. W. & Critchley, E. M. R. Loss of memory for people following temporal lobe damage. Brain 112, 1469–1483 (1989). Reports the first detailed case study of a patient who showed impaired access to person-specific semantic information from several modalities. · DOI
  23. Malone, D. R., Morris, H. H., Kay, M. C. & Levin, H. S. Prosopagnosia: a double dissociation between the recognition of familiar and unfamiliar faces. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 45, 820–822 (1982). · DOI
  24. Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. Pictures of Facial Affect (Consulting Psychologists, Palo Alto, California, 1976).
  25. Sprengelmeyer, R. et al. Loss of disgust: perception of faces and emotions in Huntington's disease. Brain 119, 1647–1665 (1996). · DOI
  26. Calder, A. J., Keane, J., Manes, F., Antoun, N. & Young, A. W. Impaired recognition and experience of disgust following brain injury. Nature Neurosci. 3, 1077–1078 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  27. Rapcsak, S. Z. et al. Fear recognition deficits after focal brain damage: a cautionary note. Neurology 54, 575–581 (2000). · DOI
  28. Bowers, D., Bauer, R. M., Coslett, H. B. & Heilman, K. M. Processing of faces by patients with unilateral hemisphere lesions. 1. Dissociation between judgements of facial affect and facial identity. Brain Cogn. 4, 258–272 (1985). · DOI
  29. Duchaine, B. C., Paerker, H. & Nakayama, K. Normal recognition of emotion in a prosopagnosic patient. Perception 32, 827–839 (2003). · DOI
  30. Bishop, D. V. M. Cognitive neuropsychology and developmental disorders: uncomfortable bedfellows. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 50A, 899–923 (1997). · DOI
  31. Karmiloff-Smith, A., Scerif, G. & Ansari, D. Double dissociations in developmental disorders? Theoretically misconceived, empirically dubious. Cortex 39, 161–163 (2003). · DOI
  32. Turk, M. & Pentland, A. Eigenfaces for recognition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 3, 71–86 (1991). · DOI · Paper page
  33. Burton, A. M., Bruce, V. & Hancock, P. J. B. From pixels to people: a model of familiar face recognition. Cogn. Sci. 23, 1–31 (1999). Presents a model of facial identity recognition in which the front end is implemented as a PCA, and the subsequent cognitive processes are implemented as an interactive activation and competition architecture. · DOI
  34. Hancock, P. J. B., Burton, A. M. & Bruce, V. Face processing: human perception and principal components analysis. Mem. Cognit. 24, 21–40 (1996).
  35. Hancock, P. J. B., Bruce, V. & Burton, A. M. A comparison of two computer-based face identification systems with human perception of faces. Vision Res. 38, 2277–2288 (1998). · DOI
  36. O'Toole, A. J. et al. The perception of face gender: the role of stimulus structure in recognition and classification. Mem. Cognit. 26, 146–160 (1998). · DOI
  37. O'Toole, A. J., Abdi, H., Deffenbacher, K. A. & Valentin, D. Low-dimensional representation of faces in higher dimensions of the face space. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 10, 405–411 (1993). · DOI
  38. O'Toole, A. J., Deffenbacher, K. A., Valentin, D. & Abdi, H. Structural aspects of face recognition and the other race effect. Mem. Cognit. 22, 208–224 (1994). · DOI
  39. Padgett, C. & Cottrell, G. in Proceedings of the 2nd Joint Symposium on Neural Computation Vol. 5, 91–101 (La Jolla, Univ. California, San Diego, 1995).
  40. Cottrell, G. W., Branson, K. M. & Calder, A. J. in 24th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Fairfax, Virginia, 2002).
  41. Calder, A. J., Burton, A. M., Miller, P., Young, A. W. & Akamatsu, S. A principal component analysis of facial expressions. Vision Res. 41, 1179–1208 (2001). Provides evidence that a PCA of the Ekman and Friesen facial expressions (reference 24) generates statistical dissociation between PCs that code identity and expression. · DOI
  42. Costen, N., Craw, I. & Akamatsu, S. in British Machine Vision Association (Scottish Chapter) Meeting (British Machine Vision Association, Glasgow, 1995).
  43. Deffenbacher, K. A., Vetter, T., Johanson, J. & O'Toole, A. J. Facial aging, attractiveness, and distinctiveness. Perception 27, 1233–1243 (1998). · DOI
  44. Schweinberger, S. R. & Soukup, G. R. Asymmetric relationships among perceptions of facial identity, emotion, and facial speech. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24, 1748–1765 (1998). · DOI
  45. Narumoto, J., Okada, T., Sadato, N., Fukui, K. & Yonekura, Y. Attention to emotion modulates fMRI activity in human right superior temporal sulcus. Cogn. Brain Res. 12, 225–231 (2001). · DOI
  46. Sugase, Y., Yamane, S., Ueno, S. & Kawano, K. Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortex. Nature 400, 869–873 (1999). · DOI
  47. Phillips, M. L. et al. Neural responses to facial and vocal expressions of fear and disgust. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 1809–1817 (1998). · DOI
  48. Morris, J. S. et al. A neuromodulatory role for the human amygdala in processing emotional facial expressions. Brain 121, 47–57 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
  49. Lewis, S. et al. Visual processing of facial affect. Neuroreport 14, 1841–1845 (2003). · DOI
  50. Streit, M. et al. Neurophysiological correlates of the recognition of facial expressions of emotion as revealed by magnetoencephalography. Cogn. Brain Res. 7, 481–491 (1999). · DOI
  51. McCarthy, G., Puce, A., Core, J. C. & Allison, T. Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 9, 605–610 (1997). · DOI · Paper page
  52. Henson, R., Shallice, T. & Dolan, R. Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. Science 287, 1269–1272 (2000). · DOI
  53. Perrett, D. I. et al. Neurones responsive to faces in the temporal cortex: studies of functional organization, sensitivity to identity and relation to perception. Hum. Neurobiol. 3, 197–208 (1984).
  54. Perrett, D. I., Hietanen, J. K., Oram, M. W. & Benson, P. J. Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B B335, 23–30 (1992).
  55. Young, M. P. & Yamane, S. Sparse population coding of faces in the inferotemporal cortex. Science 256, 1327–1331 (1992). Shows that face-responsive cells in the inferotemporal cortex of monkeys code visual properties, whereas face-responsive cells in the STS code nonvisual properties, such as familiarity or social status. · DOI
  56. Yamane, S., Kaji, S. & Kawano, K. What facial features activate face neurones in the inferotemporal cortex in the monkey? Exp. Brain Res. 73, 209–214 (1988). · DOI
  57. Rolls, E. T. & Tovee, M. J. Sparseness of the neuronal representation of stimuli in the primate temporal visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 73, 713–726 (1995). · DOI
  58. Seltzer, B. & Pandya, D. N. Afferent cortical connections and architectonics of the superior temporal sulcus and surrounding cortex in the rhesus monkey. Brain Res. 149, 1–24 (1978). · DOI
  59. Bruce, C., Desimone, R. & Gross, C. G. Visual properties of neurons in a polysensory area in superior temporal cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 46, 369–384 (1981). · DOI
  60. Sprengelmeyer, R. et al. Knowing no fear. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 2451–2456 (1999). · DOI
  61. Calder, A. J. et al. Facial emotion recognition after bilateral amygdala damage: differentially severe impairment of fear. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 13, 699–745 (1996). · DOI
  62. Sprengelmeyer, R. et al. Disgust implicated in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 1767–1773 (1997). · DOI
  63. Calder, A. J., Keane, J., Lawrence, A. D. & Manes, F. Impaired recognition of anger following damage to the ventral striatum. Brain 127, 1958–1969 (2004). · DOI
  64. Lawrence, A. D., Calder, A. J., McGowan, S. W. & Grasby, P. M. Selective disruption of the recognition of facial expressions of anger. Neuroreport 13, 881–884 (2002). · DOI
  65. Krolak-Salmon, P. et al. A specific response to disgust modulated by attention in human ventral anterior insula. Ann. Neurol. 53, 446–453 (2003). · DOI
  66. Breiter, H. C. et al. Response and habituation of the human amygdala during visual processing of facial expression. Neuron 17, 875–887 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  67. Phillips, M. L. et al. A specific neural substrate for perceiving facial expressions of disgust. Nature 389, 495–498 (1997). · DOI · Paper page
  68. Lawrence, A. D. & Calder, A. J. in Emotion, Evolution, and Rationality (eds Evans, D. & Cruse, P.) 15–47 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2003).
  69. Scott, S. K. et al. Impaired auditory recognition of fear and anger following bilateral amygdala lesions. Nature 385, 254–257 (1997). · DOI
  70. Adolphs, R. & Tranel, D. Intact recognition of emotional prosody following amygdala damage. Neuropsychologia 37, 1285–1292 (1999). · DOI
  71. Anderson, A. K. & Phelps, E. A. Intact recognition of vocal expressions of fear following bilateral lesions of the human amygdala. Neuroreport 9, 3607–3613 (1998). · DOI
  72. Wicker, B. et al. Both of us disgusted in my insula: the common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron 40, 655–664 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  73. Goldman, A. I. & Sekhar Sripada, C. Simulationist models of face-based emotion recognition. Cognition 94, 193–213 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  74. Keane, J., Calder, A. J., Hodges, J. R. & Young, A. W. Face and emotion processing in frontal variant frontotemporal dementia. Neuropsychologia 40, 655–665 (2002). · DOI
  75. Adolphs, R., Tranel, D. & Damasio, H. Neural systems for recognizing emotion from prosody. Emotion 2, 23–51 (2002). · DOI
  76. Anderson, A. K. & Phelps, E. A. Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events. Nature 411, 305–309 (2001). · DOI
  77. Anderson, A. K., Spencer, D. D., Fulbright, R. K. & Phelps, E. A. Contribution of the anteromedial temporal lobes to the evaluation of facial emotion. Neuropsychology 14, 526–536 (2000). · DOI
  78. Labar, K. S., LeDoux, J. E., Spencer, D. D. & Phelps, E. A. Impaired fear conditioning following unilateral temporal lobectomy in humans. J. Neurosci. 15, 6846–6855 (1995). · DOI · Paper page
  79. LaBar, K. S. & Phelps, E. A. Arousal-mediated memory consolidation: role of the medial temporal lobe in humans. Psychol. Sci. 9, 490–493 (1998). · DOI
  80. Phelps, E. A. et al. Specifying the contributions of the human amygdala to emotional memory: a case study. Neurocase 4, 527–540 (1998). · DOI
  81. Barraclough, N. E., Xiao, D., Baker, C. I., Oram, M. W. & Perrett, D. I. Integration of visual and auditory information by superior temporal sulcus neurons responsive to the sight of actions. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 377–391 (2005). · DOI
  82. Dolan, R. J., Morris, J. S. & de Gelder, B. Crossmodal binding of fear in voice and face. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10006–10010 (2001). · DOI
  83. Calvert, G. A., Campbell, R. & Brammer, M. J. Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in human heteromodal cortex. Curr. Biol. 10, 649–657 (2000). Provides evidence from fMRI that the STS is involved in the integration of seen and heard speech. · DOI · Paper page
  84. Campbell, R. et al. Cortical substrates for the perception of face actions: an fMRI study of the specificity of activation for seen speech and for meaningless lower-face acts (gurning). Cogn. Brain Res. 12, 233–243 (2001). · DOI
  85. Belin, P., Zatorre, R. J., Lafaille, P., Ahad, P. & Pike, B. Voice-selective areas in human auditory cortex. Nature 403, 309–312 (2000). · DOI
  86. Desimone, R. & Gross, C. G. Visual areas in the temporal cortex of the macaque. Brain Res. 178, 363–380 (1979). · DOI
  87. Oram, M. W. & Perrett, D. I. Integration of form and motion in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area (STPa) of the macaque monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 76, 109–129 (1996). Reports evidence from cell recording in monkeys that the STS is involved in the integration of visual form and motion components of biological motion. · DOI
  88. de Gelder, B. & Vroomen, J. The perception of emotions by ear and by eye. Cogn. Emotion 14, 289–311 (2000). · DOI
  89. Rosenblum, L. D., Johnson, J. A. & Saldana, H. M. Point-light facial displays enhance comprehension of speech in noise. J. Speech Hear. Res. 39, 1159–1170 (1996). · DOI
  90. Tartter, V. C. & Knowlton, K. C. Perception of sign language from an array of 27 moving spots. Nature 289, 676–678 (1981). · DOI
  91. Puce, A., Allison, T., Bentin, S., Gore, J. C. & McCarthy, G. Temporal cortex activation in humans viewing eye and mouth movements. J. Neurosci. 18, 2188–2199 (1998). · DOI
  92. Hoffman, E. A. & Haxby, J. V. Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception. Nature Neurosci. 3, 80–84 (2000). · DOI
  93. Langton, S. R. H. The mutual influence of gaze and head orientation in the analysis of social attention direction. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 53, 825–845 (2000). · DOI
  94. Langton, S. R. H., Honeyman, H. & Tessler, E. The influence of head contour and nose angle on the perception of eye-gaze direction. Percept. Psychophys. 66, 752–771 (2004). · DOI
  95. Langton, S. R. H. & Bruce, V. You must see the point: automatic processing of cues to the direction of social attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 26, 747–757 (2000). · DOI
  96. Adams, R. B. & Kleck, R. E. Perceived gaze direction and the processing of facial displays of emotion. Psychol. Sci. 14, 644–647 (2003). Presents evidence that gaze direction affects the perception of emotion from faces. · DOI
  97. Hanley, J. R., Smith, S. T. & Hadfield, J. I recognise you but I can't place you: an investigation of familiar-only experiences during tests of voice and face recognition. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 51A, 179–195 (1998). · DOI
  98. Bruce, V. & Valentine, T. in Practical Aspects of Memory: Current Research and Issues Vol. 1 (eds Gruneberg, M. M., Morris, P. E. & Sykes, R. N.) 169–174 (Wiley, Chichester, 1988).
  99. Bonda, E., Petrides, M., Ostry, D. & Evans, A. Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. J. Neurosci. 16, 3737–3744 (1996). · DOI
  100. Grossman, E. et al. Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12, 711–720 (2000). · DOI
  101. Castelli, F., Happe, F., Frith, U. & Frith, C. Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. Neuroimage 12, 314–325 (2000). · DOI
  102. Allison, T., Puce, A. & McCarthy, G. Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 267–278 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  103. Beauchamp, M. S., Lee, K. E., Haxby, J. V. & Martin, A. fMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving and manipulable objects. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15, 991–1001 (2003). · DOI
  104. Calvert, G. A. et al. Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading. Science 276, 593–596 (1997). · DOI
  105. Campbell, R., Landis, T. & Regard, M. Face recognition and lipreading: a neurological dissociation. Brain 109, 509–521 (1986). · DOI
  106. Adams, R. B. & Kleck, R. E. The effects of direct and averted gaze on the perception of facial communicated emotion. Emotion 5, 3–11 (2005). · DOI
  107. Adams, R. B., Gordon, H. L., Baird, A. A., Ambady, N. & Kleck, R. E. Gaze differentially modulates amygdala sensitivity to anger and fear faces. Science 300, 1536 (2003). · DOI
  108. O'Toole, A. J., Roark, D. A. & Abdi, H. Recognizing moving faces: a psychological and neural synthesis. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 261–266 (2002). · DOI
  109. Dimberg, U. Facial reactions for facial expressions. J. Psychophys. 19, 643–647 (1982). · DOI
  110. Watkins, K. E., Strafella, A. P. & Paus, T. Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production. Neuropsychologia 41, 989–994 (2003). · DOI
  111. Langton, S. R. H. & Bruce, V. Reflexive visual orienting in response to the social attention of others. Vis. Cogn. 6, 541–567 (1999). · DOI
  112. Driver, J. et al. Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Vis. Cogn. 6, 509–540 (1999). · DOI
  113. Friesen, C. K. & Kingstone, A. The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychol. Bull. Rev. 5, 490–495 (1998). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–829 of 829

Metadata

Authors
Calder, A. J., & Young, A. W.
Affiliations
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
Calder, Andrew J.
ORCID
Young, Andrew W.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2005-08
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
641-651
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
DOI
10.1038/nrn1724
OpenAlex
W2008222302
Cited by
948
References
124
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 56
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
face identification, facial expression recognition, face perception, two-pathway model, functional specialization, social signals
MeSH terms
Face, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Visual Pathways, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review