Cited by 735Face Recognition and PerceptionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Face and voice expression identification in patients with emotional and behavioural changes following ventral frontal lobe damage

Hornak, J, Rolls, E.T, Wade, D·1996·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Impairments in the identification of facial and vocal emotional expression were demonstrated in a group of patients with ventral frontal lobe damage who had socially inappropriate behaviour. The expression identification impairments could occur independently of perceptual impairments in facial recognition, voice discrimination, or environmental sound recognition. The face and voice expression problems did not necessarily occur together in the same patients, providing an indication of separate processing. Poor performance on both expression tests was correlated with the degree of alteration of emotional experience reported by the patients. There was also a strong positive correlation between the degree of altered emotional experience and the severity of the behavioural problems (e.g. disinhibition) found in these patients. A comparison group of patients with brain damage outside the ventral frontal lobe region, without these behavioural problems, was unimpaired on the face expression identification test, was significantly less impaired at vocal expression identification and reported little subjective emotional change. The expression identification deficits in ventral frontal patients may contribute to the abnormal behaviour seen after frontal lesions, and have implications for rehabilitation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00106-9

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Humans with OFC lesions may be less sensitive to reward, as shown by reduced subjective emotional feelings, altered social and emotional behaviour, and problems with face and voice expression processing.

    “Humans with OFC lesions may also be less sensitive to reward, as shown by their reduced subjective emotional feelings and altered social and emotional behaviour and problems with face and voice expression processing (Rolls et al., 1994; Hornak et al., 1996, 2003; Rolls, 2021b).”

    From The orbitofrontal cortex: reward, emotion and depression (2020) · cites this paper as Hornak et al., 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hornak, J., Rolls, E. T., & Wade, D.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Rolls, E.T
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-04
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
247-261
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046602920
Cited by
735
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 32
FWCI
8.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
facial expression recognition, disinhibition, social behavior
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Facial Expression, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Perceptual Disorders, Speech Perception, Voice, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review