Cited by 233Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsPharmaceutical studies and practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beyond polemics: science and ethics of ADHD

Singh, Ilina·2008·Nature reviews. Neuroscience

Abstract

What is attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)? Why are so many children being diagnosed with ADHD and prescribed medication? Are stimulant drugs an effective and safe treatment strategy? This article explores the current state of scientific research into ADHD and the key social and ethical concerns that are emerging from the sharp rise in the number of diagnoses and the use of stimulant drug treatments in children. Collaborations among scientists, social scientists and ethicists are likely to be the most promising route to understanding what ADHD is and what stimulant drugs do.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn2514

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 110 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Mieszkowski, K. Scientology's war on psychiatry. Salon [online] , (2005).
  2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (American Psychiatric Association, Washington DC, 2004).
  3. Pollack, W. Real boys (Owl Books, 1999)
  4. Clay, R. A. Psychotherapy is cost-effective. Monitor on Psychology [online] , (2002).
  5. Groopman, J. What's normal? The New Yorker [online] , (2007).
  6. Hoffmann, H. Struuwelpeter (Belitha, 2006).
  7. Singh, I. & Kelleher, K. J. Brain Enhancement in Children. Neuroethics in Practice (Oxford Univ. Press, in the press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 232

Metadata

Authors
Singh, I.
Affiliations
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Corresponding author
Singh, Ilina
Venue
Nature reviews. Neuroscience
Published
2008-12
Volume
9
Issue
12
Pages
957-964
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2033016865
Cited by
233
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 20
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2008-11-26)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Royal Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, stimulant medication, children, social ethics, treatment effectiveness and safety, interdisciplinary collaboration, science and ethics
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Ethics, Medical, Humans, Science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review