The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The amygdala and reward
Abstract
The amygdala -- an almond-shaped group of nuclei at the heart of the telencephalon -- has been associated with a range of cognitive functions, including emotion, learning, memory, attention and perception. Most current views of amygdala function emphasize its role in negative emotions, such as fear, and in linking negative emotions with other aspects of cognition, such as learning and memory. However, recent evidence supports a role for the amygdala in processing positive emotions as well as negative ones, including learning about the beneficial biological value of stimuli. Indeed, the amygdala's role in stimulus-reward learning might be just as important as its role in processing negative affect and fear conditioning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Amygdala and striatum have a well-documented anatomic connectivity (29) and show a tight functional coupling in stimulus–reward association and stimulus–cue devaluation (30).”
From Amygdala damage eliminates monetary loss aversion (2010) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“Both the amygdala and hippocampus are known to mediate attentional and learning aspects of emotion (Baxter and Murray, 2002, Calder et al., 2001; Phelps, 2004; Phelps and LeDoux, 2005).”
From Adolescent neurobiological susceptibility to social context (2016) · cites this paper as Baxter and Murray, 2002
Citations
Cites
Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex
Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3 · Cited by 6,128
What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (1998) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00019-8 · Cited by 4,127
The amygdala: vigilance and emotion
Davis, M., & Whalen, P. J. (2001) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4000812 · Cited by 2,882
Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A. R., & Lee, G. P. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-13-05473.1999 · Cited by 2,001
Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex
Platt, M. L., & Glimcher, P. W. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/22268 · Cited by 1,721
The amygdala: Neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory, and mental dysfunction.
Aggleton, J. P. (1992) · Wiley-Liss eBooks · Cited by 1,536
The Neuroscience of Natural Rewards: Relevance to Addictive Drugs
Kelley, A. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2002) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-09-03306.2002 · Cited by 1,505
Swanson, L. W., & Petrovich, G. D. (1998) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01265-x · Cited by 1,351
Relative reward preference in primate orbitofrontal cortex
Tremblay, L., & Schultz, W. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/19525 · Cited by 1,314
The amygdala: Neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory and mental dysfunction
Scheel-Krüger, J. (1993) · Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy · doi:10.1016/0891-0618(93)90037-5 · Cited by 1,281
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Mishkin, M. & Oubre, J. L. Dissociation of deficits on visual memory tasks after inferior temporal and amygdala lesions in monkeys. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 2, 1127 (1976).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging
Haber, S. N., & Knutson, B. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.129 · Cited by 3,718
Contributions of the Amygdala to Emotion Processing: From Animal Models to Human Behavior
Phelps, E. A., & LeDoux, J. E. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.09.025 · Cited by 3,203
POSNER, J., RUSSELL, J. A., & PETERSON, B. S. (2005) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579405050340 · Cited by 2,602
Dopamine in motivational control: rewarding, aversive, and alerting
Bromberg-Martin, E. S., Matsumoto, M., & Hikosaka, O. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.022 · Cited by 2,396
On the relationship between emotion and cognition
Pessoa, L. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2317 · Cited by 2,350
Metadata
- Authors
- Baxter, M. G., & Murray, E. A.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Neuroscience
- Published
- 2002-07-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 563-573
- ISSN
- 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2085971650
- Cited by
- 1,200
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 58
- FWCI
- 3.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- amygdala, reward, positive emotions, fear conditioning, emotional learning, memory, emotion and cognition
- MeSH terms
- Amygdala, Animals, Haplorhini, Association, Behavior, Animal, Choice Behavior, Discrimination Learning, Photic Stimulation, Reward, Smell, Prefrontal Cortex, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review