Cited by 679Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The amygdala, reward and emotion

Murray, Elisabeth A.·2007·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Recent research provides new insights into amygdala contributions to positive emotion and reward. Studies of neuronal activity in the monkey amygdala and of autonomic responses mediated by the monkey amygdala show that, contrary to a widely held view, the amygdala is just as important for processing positive reward and reinforcement as it is for negative. In addition, neuropsychological studies reveal that the amygdala is essential for only a fraction of what might be considered 'stimulus-reward processing', and that the neural substrates for emotion and reward are partially nonoverlapping. Finally, evidence suggests that two systems within the amygdala, operating in parallel, enable reward-predicting cues to influence behavior; one mediates a general, arousing effect of reward and the other links the sensory properties of reward to emotion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.013

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other neural pathways and brain structures, e.g., the amygdala and limbic regions, have been shown to be involved in processing of rewards and socio-emotional stimuli.

    “Besides the cortical and subcortical systems responsible for attentional and cognitive processes, other neural pathways and brains structures, e.g., the amygdala and limbic regions, have been shown to be involved in processing of rewards and socio-emotional stimuli (Murray, 2007).”
  • Emotion plays a role in decision-making.

    “It is widely acknowledged that emotion plays a role in decision-making, drawing on evidence from numerous behavioral studies using emotional stimuli as well as physiological, neuroimaging, and lesion studies.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murray, E. A.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Murray, Elisabeth A.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-11
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
489-497
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148301354
Cited by
679
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 55
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
amygdala, reward processing, positive emotions, reinforcement, neural substrates of emotion, arousal, neuropsychology of emotion
MeSH terms
Affect, Amygdala, Animals, Haplorhini, Cognition, Emotions, Humans, Reward, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review