The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence That Intermittent, Excessive Sugar Intake Causes Endogenous Opioid Dependence
Open accessAbstract
Objective: The goal was to determine whether withdrawal from sugar can cause signs of opioid dependence. Because palatable food stimulates neural systems that are implicated in drug addiction, it was hypothesized that intermittent, excessive sugar intake might create dependency, as indicated by withdrawal signs. Research Methods and Procedures: Male rats were food‐deprived for 12 hours daily, including 4 hours in the early dark, and then offered highly palatable 25% glucose in addition to chow for the next 12 hours. Withdrawal was induced by naloxone or food deprivation. Withdrawal signs were measured by observation, ultrasonic recordings, elevated plus maze tests, and in vivo microdialysis. Results: Naloxone (20 mg/kg intraperitoneally) caused somatic signs, such as teeth chattering, forepaw tremor, and head shakes. Food deprivation for 24 hours caused spontaneous withdrawal signs, such as teeth chattering. Naloxone (3 mg/kg subcutaneously) caused reduced time on the exposed arm of an elevated plus maze, where again significant teeth chattering was recorded. The plus maze anxiety effect was replicated with four control groups for comparison. Accumbens microdialysis revealed that naloxone (10 and 20 mg/kg intraperitoneally) decreased extracellular dopamine (DA), while dose‐dependently increasing acetylcholine (ACh). The naloxone‐induced DA/ACh imbalance was replicated with 10% sucrose and 3 mg/kg naloxone subcutaneously. Discussion: Repeated, excessive intake of sugar created a state in which an opioid antagonist caused behavioral and neurochemical signs of opioid withdrawal. The indices of anxiety and DA/ACh imbalance were qualitatively similar to withdrawal from morphine or nicotine, suggesting that the rats had become sugar‐dependent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hernandez, L., & Hoebel, B. G. (1988) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/0024-3205(88)90036-7 · Cited by 627
Self-citationMcBride, W. J., Murphy, J. M., & Ikemoto, S. (1999) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00022-4 · Cited by 574
Excessive sugar intake alters binding to dopamine and mu-opioid receptors in the brain
Colantuoni, C., Schwenker, J., McCarthy, J., Rada, P., Ladenheim, B., Cadet, J.-L., Schwartz, G. J., Moran, T. H., & Hoebel, B. G. (2001) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200111160-00035 · Cited by 471
Self-citationSelf-injection of amphetamine directly into the brain
Hoebel, B. G., Monaco, A. P., Hernandez, L., Aulisi, E. F., Stanley, B. G., & Lenard, L. (1983) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00429012 · Cited by 367
Self-citationStinus, L., Le Moal, M., & Koob, G. F. (1990) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(90)90106-e · Cited by 317
Pothos, E., Rada, P., Mark, G. P., & Hoebel, B. G. (1991) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(91)91724-f · Cited by 288
Self-citationDrewnowski, A., Krahn, D., Demitrack, M., Nairn, K., & Gosnell, B. (1995) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/61.6.1206 · Cited by 197
Rada, P., Jensen, K., & Hoebel, B. (2001) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s002130100781 · Cited by 141
Self-citation
Cited by
Stress, eating and the reward system
Adam, T. C., & Epel, E. S. (2007) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.04.011 · Cited by 1,732
Preliminary validation of the Yale Food Addiction Scale
Gearhardt, A. N., Corbin, W. R., & Brownell, K. D. (2009) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2008.12.003 · Cited by 1,369
Avena, N. M., Rada, P., & Hoebel, B. G. (2008) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.04.019 · Cited by 1,358
Self-citationThe dopamine motive system: implications for drug and food addiction
Volkow, N. D., Wise, R. A., & Baler, R. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2017.130 · Cited by 939
Intense Sweetness Surpasses Cocaine Reward
Lenoir, M., Serre, F., Cantin, L., & Ahmed, S. H. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000698 · Cited by 608
Metadata
- Authors
- Colantuoni, C., Rada, P., McCarthy, J., Patten, C., Avena, N. M., Chadeayne, A., & Hoebel, B. G.
- Venue
- Obesity Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 478-488
- ISSN
- 1071-7323 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-8528
- OpenAlex
- W2153722042
- Cited by
- 545
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 5.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.