Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 231

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cigarette Smoking and Fat Distribution in 21, 828 British Men and Women: A Population‐based Study

Canoy, Dexter, Wareham, Nicholas, Luben, Robert, Welch, Ailsa, Bingham, Sheila, Day, Nicholas, Khaw, Kay‐Tee·2005·Obesity Research

Abstract

Objective : To examine the relationship between cigarette smoking habits and fat distribution in a population‐based cohort of men and women. Research Methods and Procedures : We analyzed cross‐sectional data from 21, 828 men and women who were 45 to 79 years of age, residents in Norfolk, United Kingdom, and were recruited between 1993 and 1997. Cigarette smoking habits and other lifestyle factors were assessed using self‐reported questionnaires. Anthropometric measures were obtained during a health examination. Results : Waist‐hip ratio was highest among current smokers and least among never smokers after adjusting for age, BMI, alcohol intake, total energy intake, physical activity, and education. Higher waist‐hip ratio was directly associated with higher smoking pack‐years in current and former smokers and inversely with duration since quitting smoking in former smokers. Adjusting for age, BMI, and other covariates, current smokers had higher waist circumference but lower hip circumference compared with former or never smokers. Discussion : Cigarette smoking habits seem to influence fat distribution patterns. Although smokers have lower mean BMI compared with nonsmokers, they have a more metabolically adverse fat distribution profile, with higher central adiposity. The explanation for this association may help elucidate the mechanisms underlying the adverse health consequences of cigarette smoking and abdominal obesity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2005.177

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. World Health Organization, 2000, Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic
  2. 10.1001/jama.1989.03430090047021 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0002-8703(75)90320-8 · DOI
  4. 10.2105/AJPH.77.4.439 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.7326/0003-4819-111-10-783 · DOI
  6. Tonkelaar I., 1990, Fat distribution in relation to age, degree of obesity, smoking habits, parity and estrogen use: a cross‐sectional study in 11, 825 Dutch women participating in the DOM‐project, Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 14, 753
  7. 10.2105/AJPH.82.2.273 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802697 · DOI
  9. 10.1001/jama.1989.03420080089037 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0026-0495(96)90187-0 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115870 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/gerona/54.6.M293 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/oby.2002.122 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S1262-3636(07)70101-5 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802827 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/ajcn/53.5.1104 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0026-0495(91)90225-L · DOI
  18. Jebb S., 1998, Clinical Obesity
  19. 10.1093/aje/kwf122 · DOI
  20. Day N., 1999, EPIC‐Norfolk: study design and characteristics of the cohort. European Prospective Investigation of Cancer, Br J Cancer, 80, 95
  21. Lohman T., 1991, Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual
  22. Johnston F. E., 1988, Body fat deposition in adult obese women. I. Patterns of fat distribution, Am J Clin Nutr, 47, 225, 10.1093/ajcn/47.2.225 · DOI
  23. Haffner S. M., 1987, Do upper‐body and centralized adiposity measure different aspects of regional body‐fat distribution? Relationship to non‐insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus, lipids, and lipoproteins, Diabetes, 36, 43, 10.2337/diab.36.1.43 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/ije/31.1.168 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1136/jech.57.4.270 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/ije/26.suppl_1.S137 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1079/PHN2001196 · DOI
  28. 10.2105/AJPH.77.10.1324 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/ije/18.2.345 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600406 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800386 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/0021-9681(82)90088-1 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/0021-9681(77)90035-2 · DOI
  34. Kissebah A. H., 1985, Metabolic Complications of Obesities, 115
  35. 10.1093/aje/126.2.187 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1056/NEJM198403083101002 · DOI
  37. 10.1136/bmj.289.6454.1257 · DOI
  38. 10.1136/bmj.288.6428.1401 · DOI
  39. 10.1001/jama.1993.03500040049035 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/ajcn/77.5.1192 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/oby.2001.85 · DOI

Cited by

See all 231

Metadata

Authors
Canoy, D., Wareham, N., Luben, R., Welch, A., Bingham, S., Day, N., & Khaw, K.
Venue
Obesity Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
1466-1475
ISSN
  • 1071-7323
  • 1550-8528
Cited by
231
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cigarette Smoking and Fat Distribution in 21, 828 British Men and Women: A Population‐based Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/oby.2005.177
The paper
Canoy, D., Wareham, N., Luben, R., Welch, A., Bingham, S., Day, N., & Khaw, K. (2005). Cigarette Smoking and Fat Distribution in 21, 828 British Men and Women: A Population‐based Study. Obesity Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2005.177

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.