Cited by 472Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityCancer Risks and Factors

Body Fat Distribution and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Men and Women in the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition in Norfolk Cohort: A Population-Based Prospective Study

Canoy, Dexter, Boekholdt, S. Matthijs, Wareham, Nicholas, Luben, Robert, Welch, Ailsa, Bingham, Sheila, Buchan, Iain, Day, Nicholas +1 more·2007·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Body fat distribution has been cross-sectionally associated with atherosclerotic disease risk factors, but the prospective relation with coronary heart disease remains uncertain. Methods and Results— We examined the prospective relation between fat distribution indices and coronary heart disease among 24 508 men and women 45 to 79 years of age using proportional hazards regression. During a mean 9.1 years of follow-up, 1708 men and 892 women developed coronary heart disease. The risk for developing subsequent coronary heart disease increased continuously across the range of waist-hip ratio. Hazard ratios (95% CI) of the top versus bottom fifth of waist-hip ratio were 1.55 (1.28 to 1.73) in men and 1.91 (1.44 to 2.54) in women after adjustment for body mass index and other coronary heart disease risk factors. Hazard ratios increased with waist circumference, but risk estimates for waist circumference without hip circumference adjustment were lower by 10% to 18%. After adjustment for waist circumference, body mass index, and coronary heart disease risk factors, hazard ratios for 1-SD increase in hip circumference were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.87) in men and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.93) in women. Hazard ratios for body mass index were greatly attenuated when we adjusted for waist-hip ratio or waist circumference and other covariates. Conclusions— Indices of abdominal obesity were more consistently and strongly predictive of coronary heart disease than body mass index. These simple and inexpensive measurements could be used to assess obesity-related coronary heart disease risk in relatively healthy men and women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.106.673756

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Literature shows that individuals with a healthy weight but high visceral fat are at higher cardiovascular risk than those with a higher BMI.

    “Literature shows that individuals with a healthy weight, but high visceral fat, are at higher cardiovascular risk than those with a higher BMI (Canoy et al., 2007; Stefan & Schulze, 2023).”

    From Long-term cardiometabolic effects of early institutionalization and foster care: Evidence from the Bucharest Early Intervention Project (2026) · cites this paper as Canoy et al., 2007

    The Results report that lean participants with a higher waist–hip ratio had more than 50% higher coronary heart disease risk than lean participants with a lower ratio. That supports elevated risk at a healthy BMI, but the comparison is not with people who have a higher BMI. The paper also uses waist–hip ratio as an indicator of fat distribution rather than directly measuring visceral fat, and its outcome is coronary heart disease rather than cardiovascular risk generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Survival Analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1999.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Canoy, D., Boekholdt, S. M., Wareham, N., Luben, R., Welch, A., Bingham, S., Buchan, I., Day, N., & Khaw, K.-T.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2007-12-18
Volume
116
Issue
25
Pages
2933-2943
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1995930672
Cited by
472
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 37
FWCI
22.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
body fat distribution, coronary artery disease, waist-to-hip ratio, waist circumference, hip circumference, abdominal obesity, body mass index, cardiovascular risk, sex differences, EPIC-Norfolk cohort
MeSH terms
Aged, Coronary Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Obesity, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Sex Distribution, Waist-Hip Ratio, Body Fat Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review