Cited by 634Nutritional Studies and DietNutrition and Health StudiesStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Validation of dietary assessment methods in the UK arm of EPIC using weighed records, and 24-hour urinary nitrogen and potassium and serum vitamin C and carotenoids as biomarkers

Bingham, S.·1997·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the UK EPIC validation studies, the accuracy of several methods was assessed by comparison with to-day weighed records and the biomarkers, 24-hour urine nitrogen (N) and potassium (K), plasma carotenoids and plasma vitamin C. METHODS: Comparisons between methods were made on 156 women, studied over 1 year at 3-monthly intervals at home. On each of four occasions, volunteers completed 4 days of weighed records and provided two 24-hour urine collections and a fasting blood sample. RESULTS: In comparison with the 16 days of weighed records, a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) yielded higher values mainly due to greater reported consumption of milk and of vegetables. A 24-hour recall was as good as the FFQ in placing individuals in the distribution of habitual diet from weighed records. Results obtained from a 7-day estimated record were closest to those obtained from the weighed record. Correlations between 24-hour urine excretion and dietary N intake from weighed records were high (0.78-0.87) as were those with estimated food diaries (0.60-0.70). Correlations between urine N and the FFQ and 24-hour recall were lower (0.10 to 0.27), but improved by energy adjustment using residuals for N and K which are correlated with total energy intake. Comparisons between dietary estimates and urinary K and serum carotenoids and vitamin C showed broadly similar results. Limited biomarker information amongst 200 UK EPIC participants supported the findings of the validation study. CONCLUSIONS: UK EPIC uses three methods (the 7-day diary, an improved FFQ, and the 24-hour recall) to assess diet. 93% of first food diaries are returned completed by participants. Repeated diaries are the main dietary assessment method for nested case-control analyses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/26.suppl_1.s137

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bingham, S.
Corresponding author
Bingham, S.
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1997-02-01
Volume
26
Issue
90001
Pages
137S-151
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2104644780
Cited by
634
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 31
FWCI
10.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
dietary assessment validation, urinary potassium, plasma carotenoids, serum vitamin C, food frequency questionnaire, 24-hour dietary recall, energy adjustment, EPIC cohort, women's diet
MeSH terms
Aged, Ascorbic Acid, Carotenoids, Diet, Diet Surveys, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Middle Aged, Nitrogen, Potassium, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review