Cited by 33Diet and metabolism studiesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeBariatric Surgery and Outcomes

Cost‐Effectiveness of a Low‐Carbohydrate Diet and a Standard Diet in Severe Obesity

Open access
Tsai, Adam Gilden, Glick, Henry A., Shera, David, Stern, Linda, Samaha, Frederick F.·2005·Obesity Research

Abstract

Objective: Low‐carbohydrate diets have become a popular alternative to standard diets for weight loss. Our aim was to compare the cost‐effectiveness of these two diets. Research Methods and Procedures: The patient population included 129 severely obese subjects (BMI = 42.9) from a randomized trial; participants had a high prevalence of diabetes or metabolic syndrome. We compared within‐trial costs, quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs), and the incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (CER) for the two study groups. We imputed missing values for QALYs. The CER was bootstrapped to derive 95% confidence intervals and to define acceptability cut‐offs. We took a societal perspective for our analysis. Results: Total costs during the one year of the trial were $6742 ± 6675 and $6249 ± 5100 for the low‐carbohydrate and standard groups, respectively (p= 0.78). Participants experienced 0.64 ± 0.02 and 0.61 ± 0.02 QALYs during the one year of the study, respectively (p= 0.17 for difference). The point estimate of the incremental CER was $−1225/QALY (i.e., the low‐carbohydrate diet dominated the standard diet). However, in the bootstrap analysis, the wide spread of CERs caused the 95% confidence interval to be undefined. The probabilities that the low‐carbohydrate diet was acceptable, using cut‐offs of $50, 000/QALY, $100, 000/QALY, and $150, 000/QALY, were 72.4% 78.6%, and 79.8%, respectively. Discussion: The low‐carbohydrate diet was not more cost‐effective for weight loss than the standard diet in the patient population studied. Larger studies are needed to better assess the cost‐effectiveness of dietary therapies for weight loss.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2005.223

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsai, A. G., Glick, H. A., Shera, D., Stern, L., & Samaha, F. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Samaha, Frederick F.
Venue
Obesity Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-10
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
1834-1840
ISSN
  • 1071-7323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-8528
OpenAlex
W2061624169
Cited by
33
References
33
Citations by year
2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (2-T32-HP-010026)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Keywords
low-carbohydrate diet, standard diet, morbid obesity, weight loss, cost-effectiveness, quality-adjusted life years, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, dietary therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Dietary Carbohydrates, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Severity of Illness Index, Quality-Adjusted Life Years

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review