Cited by 174Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Impact of an intensive lifestyle intervention on use and cost of medical services among overweight and obese adults with type 2 diabetes: the action for health in diabetes

Open access
Espeland, Mark A., Glick, Henry A., Bertoni, Alain, Brancati, Frederick L., Bray, George A., Clark, Jeanne M., Curtis, Jeffrey M., Egan, Caitlin +36 more·2014·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relative impact of an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) on use and costs of health care within the Look AHEAD trial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 5,121 overweight or obese adults with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to an ILI that promoted weight loss or to a comparison condition of diabetes support and education (DSE). Use and costs of health-care services were recorded across an average of 10 years. RESULTS: ILI led to reductions in annual hospitalizations (11%, P = 0.004), hospital days (15%, P = 0.01), and number of medications (6%, P < 0.001), resulting in cost savings for hospitalization (10%, P = 0.04) and medication (7%, P < 0.001). ILI produced a mean relative per-person 10-year cost savings of $5,280 (95% CI 3,385–7,175); however, these were not evident among individuals with a history of cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with DSE over 10 years, ILI participants had fewer hospitalizations, fewer medications, and lower health-care costs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc14-0093

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite modest weight losses from behavioral interventions, small weight losses can lead to impressive health improvements and risk factor reductions.

    “Despite the modest weight losses associated with behavioral interventions, small weight losses can lead to impressive health improvements and risk factor reductions.”

    From Maintenance of Lost Weight and Long-Term Management of Obesity (2018) · cites this paper as [87]

    The Conclusions report weight loss alongside improvements in diabetes control, blood pressure, lipids, and other health measures. But the study concerns overweight or obese adults with type 2 diabetes, and its intervention combined weight loss with increased physical activity; it does not establish that small weight losses alone produce these improvements across behavioral interventions generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the Look Ahead trial, 6% weight loss over eight years yielded improvements in cardiovascular risk factors, glycemic control, lipids, less medication usage, and reduced hospitalizations and healthcare costs.

    “In the Look Ahead trial, 6% weight loss over eight years yielded improvements in a range of cardiovascular risk factors, including glycemic control and lipids, as well as less medication usage, and reduced hospitalizations and healthcare costs87,88.”

    From Maintenance of Lost Weight and Long-Term Management of Obesity (2018) · cites this paper as [87]

    The Conclusions (page unavailable) report improvements in diabetes-control markers and plasma lipids, as well as fewer hospitalizations, less medication use, and lower health-care costs with the intensive lifestyle intervention. They describe outcomes over 10 years, however, and do not establish that 6% weight loss over eight years yielded those benefits. The paper also notes that the intervention did not significantly reduce major cardiovascular events. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Espeland, M. A., Glick, H. A., Bertoni, A., Brancati, F. L., Bray, G. A., Clark, J. M., Curtis, J. M., Egan, C., Evans, M., Foreyt, J. P., Ghazarian, S., Gregg, E. W., Hazuda, H. P., Hill, J. O., Hire, D., Horton, E. S., Hubbard, V. S., Jakicic, J. M., Jeffery, R. W., Johnson, K. C., Kahn, S. E., Killean, T., Kitabchi, A. E., Knowler, W. C., Kriska, A., Lewis, C. E., Miller, M., Montez, M. G., Murillo, A., Nathan, D. M., Nyenwe, E., Patricio, J., Peters, A. L., Pi-Sunyer, X., Pownall, H., Redmon, J. B., Rushing, J., Ryan, D. H., Safford, M., Tsai, A. G., Wadden, T. A., Wing, R. R., Yanovski, S. Z., & Zhang, P.
Affiliations
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Roybal Comprehensive Health Center, Los Angeles, CA
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • University of Colorado Health (US)
  • Joslin Diabetes Center (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center (US)
  • Division of and Department of Medicine, St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital, New York, NY
Corresponding author
Espeland, Mark A.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2014-08-07
Volume
37
Issue
9
Pages
2548-2556
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2154794041
Cited by
174
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 9
FWCI
21.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001120)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01DK057149, R01DK081472, P30DK017047, P30DK079626)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P20MD006899)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
intensive lifestyle intervention, type 2 diabetes, obesity, overweight, health care costs, hospitalization, medication use, diabetes support and education, weight loss, cardiovascular disease history, Look AHEAD trial
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Services, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Single-Blind Method, Health Care Costs, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review