Cited by 52Diet and metabolism studiesCardiovascular and exercise physiologyMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Effects of a Low Carbohydrate Weight Loss Diet on Exercise Capacity and Tolerance in Obese Subjects

Open access
Brinkworth, Grant D., Noakes, Manny, Clifton, Peter M., Buckley, Jonathan D.·2009·Obesity

Abstract

Dietary restriction and increased physical activity are recommended for obesity treatment. Very low carbohydrate diets are used to promote weight loss, but their effects on physical function and exercise tolerance in overweight and obese individuals are largely unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a very low carbohydrate, high fat (LC) diet with a conventional high carbohydrate, low fat (HC) diet on aerobic capacity, fuel utilization during submaximal exercise, perceived exercise effort (RPE) and muscle strength. Sixty subjects (age: 49.2 ± 1.2 years; BMI: 33.6 ± 0.5 kg/m 2) were randomly assigned to an energy restricted (∼6–7 MJ, 30% deficit), planned isocaloric LC or HC for 8 weeks. At baseline and week 8, subjects performed incremental treadmill exercise to exhaustion and handgrip and isometric knee extensor strength were assessed. Weight loss was greater in LC compared with HC (8.4 ± 0.4% and 6.7 ± 0.5%, respectively; P = 0.01 time × diet). Peak oxygen uptake and heart rate were unchanged in both groups (P > 0.17). Fat oxidation increased during submaximal exercise in LC but not HC (P < 0.001 time × diet effect). On both diets, perception of effort during submaximal exercise and handgrip strength decreased (P ≤ 0.03 for time), but knee extensor strength remained unchanged (P > 0.25). An LC weight loss diet shifted fuel utilization toward greater fat oxidation during exercise, but had no detrimental effect on maximal or submaximal markers of aerobic exercise performance or muscle strength compared with an HC diet. Further studies are required to determine the interaction of LC diets with regular exercise training and the long‐term health effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2009.134

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Freedman M, King J, Kennedy E. Popular diets: a scientific review. Obes Res 2001;9(Suppl 1):S1-S40.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brinkworth, G. D., Noakes, M., Clifton, P. M., & Buckley, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Brinkworth, Grant D.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-10
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
1916-1923
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2048371986
Cited by
52
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart Foundation of Australia
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
low-carbohydrate diet, high-fat diet, weight loss, exercise capacity, cardiorespiratory fitness, fat oxidation, fuel utilization, exercise tolerance, perceived exertion, muscle strength, grip strength, isometric knee extensor strength, caloric restriction, submaximal exercise
MeSH terms
Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Oxygen Consumption, Weight Loss, Exercise, Statistics, Nonparametric, Caloric Restriction, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review