Cited by 60Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingBody Composition Measurement Techniques

In a single-blind, matched group design: Branched-chain amino acid supplementation and resistance training maintains lean body mass during a caloric restricted diet

Open access
Dudgeon, Wesley David, Kelley, Elizabeth Page, Scheett, Timothy Paul·2016·Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Athletes and active adults many times have the goal of improving/maintaining fitness while losing weight and this is best achieved by caloric restriction in combination with exercise. However, this poses a risk for lean tissue loss, which can limit performance. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) supplement, in conjunction with heavy resistance training and a carbohydrate caloric-restricted "cut diet" on body composition and muscle fitness. METHODS: Seventeen resistance-trained males (21-28 years of age) were randomized to a BCAA group (n = 9) or a carbohydrate (CHO) group (n = 8) who both received their respective supplement during the 8 weeks of a prescribed body building style resistance training protocol. Subjects were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (based upon pre-intervention analysis) that was to be followed during the study. RESULTS: The BCAA group lost fat mass (-0.05 ± 0.08 kg;p < .05) and maintained lean mass, while the CHO group lost lean mass (-0.90 ± 0.06 kg; p < .05) and body mass (-2.3 ± 0.7 kg; p < .05). Both groups increased 1RM squat, but the increase in the BCAA group (15.1 ± 2.2 kg; p < .05)was greater (P < 0.05) than the CHO group. The BCAA group increased 1RM bench press (7.1 ± 1.6 kg; P < 0.05), while the CHO group decreased strength (-3.7 ± 2.3 kg; P < 0.05). The only change in muscular endurance was an increase in repetitions to fatigue (5.3 ± 0.2; p < .05) in the CHO group. CONCLUSION: These results show that BCAA supplementation in trained individuals performing resistance training while on a hypocaloric diet can maintain lean mass and preserve skeletal muscle performance while losing fat mass.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In 17 resistance-trained males on an 8-week hypocaloric “cut diet” plus resistance training, BCAA supplementation maintained lean mass and improved strength compared with a carbohydrate supplement. The CHO group lost lean and total body mass and decreased bench press strength.

Key findings

  • BCAA group lost fat mass (reported as −0.05 ± 0.08 kg; p < 0.05) and maintained lean mass, while the CHO group lost lean mass (−0.90 ± 0.06 kg; p < 0.05) and body mass (−2.3 ± 0.7 kg; p < 0.05).
  • Both groups increased 1RM squat, but the BCAA increase (15.1 ± 2.2 kg) was greater (p < 0.05) than the CHO increase (4.8 ± 1.8 kg).
  • BCAA group increased 1RM bench press (7.1 ± 1.6 kg; p < 0.05), while the CHO group decreased strength (−3.7 ± 2.3 kg; p < 0.05).
  • The only muscular endurance change was an increase in repetitions to fatigue in the CHO group (5.3 ± 0.2; p < 0.05) on the squat; neither group changed bench press repetitions to fatigue. BCAA group also decreased RMR (−412 ± 67 kcal/day; p < 0.05), though this was not different from CHO.

Methods

  • Single-blind, matched-group design with 17 resistance-trained males (21–28 years) randomized to BCAA (n = 9) or carbohydrate (CHO; n = 8); both groups followed the same individualized hypocaloric, carbohydrate-restricted “cut diet” and a bodybuilding-style split resistance-training program 4 days/week for 8 weeks.
  • Supplements were consumed pre- and post-workout; body composition was assessed by hydrostatic weighing, strength by 1RM bench press and parallel back squat using NSCA protocol, endurance by repetitions to fatigue at 80% 1RM, and RMR via ParvoMedics TrueOne metabolic cart.
  • Analysis used SigmaStat 3.5 with paired and unpaired t-tests, Tukey’s post hoc test, intraclass correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability, α = 0.05, and data expressed as means ± SE.

Limitations

  • Stated: small sample size allowed robust changes in a few subjects to produce significant group improvements, particularly for repetitions to fatigue.
  • Stated: dietary analyses via food records were not used because prior experience found underreporting, portion-size inaccuracies, and omitted foods; compliance relied on weekly interviews and training logs.
  • Evident: the design was single-blind, not double-blind, and Table 2 shows baseline differences between groups in body mass, lean mass, and fat mass despite the matched-group description.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12970-015-0112-9

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 44 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The CHO group had a significant decrease in lean mass.

    “While there was a significant decrease in lean mass in the CHO group”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The CHO group had a significant reduction in body mass (−2.3 ± 0.7 kg) over the 8-week intervention.

    “Body mass did not change in the BCAA group, but the CHO group did see a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in body mass (−2.3 ± 0.7 kg) (see Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The CHO group exhibited no change in RMR.

    “who exhibited no change in RMR.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Body mass did not change in the BCAA group over the 8-week intervention.

    “Body mass did not change in the BCAA group, but the CHO group did see a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in body mass (−2.3 ± 0.7 kg) (see Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The BCAA group showed no change in lean mass over the 8-week intervention.

    “Contributing to the change in total body mass was a significant (p < 0.05) loss in lean mass (−0.90 ± 0.06 kg) in the CHO group, while the BCAA group showed no change in lean mass.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 21
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 26
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The CHO group did not lose fat mass, though the trend (p < 0.1) was strong.

    “there was not a loss of fat mass, though the trend (p < 0.1) was strong.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Eight weeks of resistance training combined with a BCAA supplement and caloric restriction elicited a significant difference in RMR between BCAA and CHO groups, where the BCAA group decreased RMR and the CHO group showed no changes.

    “Eight weeks of resistance training combined with a BCAA supplement and caloric restriction elicited a significant difference in RMR between BCAA and CHO groups, where the BCAA group decreased RMR and the CHO group showed no changes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The 26 g daily ingestion of BCAA product in this study had a beneficial effect of reduced fat mass and lean mass maintenance.

    “Similarly, the 26 g daily ingestion of BCAA product in our study had a beneficial effect of reduced fat mass and lean mass maintenance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    We observed consistent and nearly uniform responses from subjects across the other measures of muscular performance, but in the repetitions to fatigue a couple subjects showed tremendous improvements, thus resulting in a significant group change.

    “We observed consistent and nearly uniform responses from subjects across the other measures of muscular performance, but in the repetitions to fatigue a couple subjects showed tremendous improvements, thus resulting in a significant group change.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    BCAA supplementation may augment or stimulate skeletal muscle regeneration by suppressing post-exercise protein degradation, leading to greater gains in lean mass.

    “Nutritional supplements such as branched-chain amino acids (BCAA; valine, leucine, isoleucine) may augment or stimulate skeletal muscle regeneration by suppressing post-exercise protein degradation, therefore leading to greater gains in lean mass [5].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] Kreider RB, 2010, J Int Soc Sport Nut source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Maintaining an energy deficient diet during a period of intense or unaccustomed resistance training may lead to significant losses in lean mass and decrease work output.

    “However, maintaining an energy deficient diet during a period of intense or unaccustomed resistance training may lead to significant losses in lean mass and decrease work output, thus hindering athletic performance, as well as increasing the risk for acute illness and training-related injury [5, 7, 8].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [5] Kreider RB, 2010, J Int Soc Sport Nut source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [7] Garthe, I., Taastad, T., Refsnes, P.E., Koivisto, A. & Sundgot-Borgen, J. Effect of two different weight loss rates on body composition and strength and power-related performance in elite athletes. Int J Sport Nut Ex Met. 2011; 21(2):91–104. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [8] Howatson G, 2012, J Int Soc Sport Nut source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Consumption of leucine can turn individuals from a negative to a positive whole body protein balance after intense resistance training exercise.

    “Similarly, Norton & Layman [14] found that the consumption of leucine, one of three BCAAs, can turn individuals from a negative to a positive whole body protein balance after intense resistance training exercise [14].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] Norton LE, 2006, J Nut source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The study used a single-blind, matched group design.

    “In a single-blind, matched group design, subjects were provided a body building style split resistance training program for 8 weeks (four days/week).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    This finding is consistent with other studies that have reported enhanced skeletal muscle protein synthesis and lean muscle maintenance in response to exercise and BCAA supplementation.

    “This finding is consistent with other studies that have reported enhanced skeletal muscle protein synthesis and lean muscle maintenance in response to exercise and BCAA supplementation [13, 25].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [13] Spillane M, 2012, J Sport Sci Med

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [25] Tipton KD, 2010, Med Sci Sport Ex source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    High fructose corn syrup and other processed carbohydrates such as sucrose have been associated with fat accumulation.

    “HFCS, and other processed carbohydrates such as sucrose, have been associated with fat accumulation [21, 22].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [21] Maersk M, 2012, Am J Clin Nut source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [22] Bocarsly ME, 2010, Pharmacol Biochem Be source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Resistance training performed regularly has been shown to increase strength, muscular endurance, skeletal muscle hypertrophy, and favorable changes in body composition, including decreases in body fat mass and increases in lean mass.

    “When performed regularly, resistance training has been shown to increase strength, muscular endurance, skeletal muscle hypertrophy, as well as result in favorable changes in body composition, including decreases in body fat mass and increases in lean mass, all of which can improve health-related quality of life [4–6].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [4] Mielke M, 2009, J Ex Phys

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [5] Kreider RB, 2010, J Int Soc Sport Nut source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [6] Winett RA, 2010, Cur Sport Med Reports (ACSM) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Subjects were randomized to pre-exercise and post-exercise ingestion of either a BCAA nutritional supplement or a carbohydrate based supplement.

    “Further, subjects were randomized to pre-exercise and post-exercise ingestion of either a BCAA nutritional supplement (Scivation XTend™, Scivation, Inc.) or a carbohydrate based supplement (POWERADE®).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Insufficient dietary protein intake post-exercise may cause increased protein catabolism, which may result in a negative protein balance and slower muscle recovery.

    “Insufficient dietary protein intake post-exercise may cause increased protein catabolism, which may result in a negative protein balance and slower muscle recovery [5].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] Kreider RB, 2010, J Int Soc Sport Nut source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The loss in body mass in the CHO group was anticipated because it is a typical outcome to reduced carbohydrate caloric restriction.

    “The loss in body mass in the CHO group was anticipated; as this is a typical outcome to reduced carbohydrate caloric restriction [20].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Brehm BJ, 2003, J Clin Endo Met source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Both BCAA and CHO groups engaged in identical, supervised resistance training programs and received individualized hypocaloric carbohydrate restricted diets for 8 weeks.

    “Both BCAA and CHO groups engaged in identical, supervised resistance training programs, and received individualized hypocaloric carbohydrate restricted diets for a duration of 8 weeks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    BCAAs have been shown to regulate skeletal muscle protein synthesis and muscle recovery.

    “BCAAs are catabolized in the muscle and have been shown to regulate skeletal muscle protein synthesis and muscle recovery [11].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] Lourad RJ, 1990, Clin Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Intraclass correlation coefficients were performed to examine the test-retest reliability of the performance tests.

    “Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were performed to examine the test-retest reliability of the performance tests.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The literature is not in agreement that HFCS consumption leads to fat accumulation.

    “However, it should be noted that the literate is not in agreement that HFCS consumption leads to fat accumulation [23].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23] Bravo S, 2013, Appl Physiol Nutr Metab source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Increased energy expenditure can decrease risk for chronic diseases such as metabolic disease, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease.

    “thus increased energy expenditure can then decrease risk for chronic diseases such as metabolic disease, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease [6].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Winett RA, 2010, Cur Sport Med Reports (ACSM) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Resistance training, provision of adequate amounts of dietary protein, and essential amino acids have all been shown to increase muscle protein synthesis in healthy adults.

    “Resistance training, provision of adequate amounts of dietary protein, and essential amino acids have all been shown to increase muscle protein synthesis in healthy adults [8]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] Howatson G, 2012, J Int Soc Sport Nut source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mourier et al. found that a high daily dose of a BCAA supplement reduced body fat and spared lean mass in male athletes.

    “However, Mourier et al. [24] found that a high daily dose of a BCAA supplement reduced body fat and spared lean mass in male athletes [22].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] Mourier A, 1997, Int J Sport Med source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Spillane et al. found that muscle strength increased with training, but no significant effects were evident between placebo and BCAA groups, indicating the lack of a treatment effect in the BCAA group.

    “Muscle strength increased with training, but no significant effects were evident between placebo and BCAA groups, indicating the lack of a treatment effect in the BCAA group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Spillane M, 2012, Nut & Health source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is possible that the decreased lean mass in the CHO group can be attributed to a decrease in protein synthesis, due to a reduced calorie diet, coupled with a muscle-damaging resistance training program.

    “It is possible that the decreased lean mass in the CHO group can be attributed to a decrease in protein synthesis, due to a reduced calorie diet, coupled with a muscle-damaging resistance training program.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    It was anticipated that on a hypocaloric diet, there would not be any gains in muscular endurance, given the glycolytic nature of the activity.

    “It was anticipated that on a hypocaloric diet, there would not be any gains in muscular endurance, given the glycolytic nature of the activity [30, 31].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [30] Lima-Silva AE, 2013, Appl Phys Nut Met

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [31] Brinkworth GD, 2009, Obesity J source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is possible that the CHO supplementation in the CHO group enhanced glycogen storage, which improved fatigue resistance and in turn resulted in increased repetitions to fatigue.

    “It is possible that the CHO supplementation in the CHO group enhanced glycogen storage, which improved fatigue resistance and in turn resulted in increased repetitions to fatigue.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    In a hypocaloric state the BCAA may have a more robust effect.

    “Further, it may be that in a hypocaloric state the BCAA has a more robust effect [30].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] Lima-Silva AE, 2013, Appl Phys Nut Met

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    No control group was provided for the study by Candeloro et al., making conclusions inconclusive.

    “However, no control group was provided for this study, making the conclusions as to whether the BCAA supplementation was predominant in improving lean mass and grip strength inconclusive [28].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] Candeloro N, 1995, Minerva Endocrin

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    BCAA supplementation was found to provide a beneficial effect on body composition and isometric hand-grip strength, even without a concurrent exercise training protocol.

    “Similarly, BCAA supplementation was found to provide a beneficial effect on body composition and isometric hand-grip strength, even without a concurrent exercise training protocol [28].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] Candeloro N, 1995, Minerva Endocrin

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    BCAA supplementation enhances/promotes myofibrillar protein synthesis and aids in muscle recovery.

    “It has been shown that BCAA supplementation enhances/promotes myofibrillar protein synthesis and aids in muscle recovery.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Providing individuals with BCAA can stimulate myofibrillar protein synthesis and in turn preserve lean body mass.

    “Providing individuals with BCAA can stimulate myofibrillar protein synthesis and in turn preserve lean body mass.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The combination of a protein supplement (whey and essential amino acids) with a calorie restricted diet was more effective than a hypocaloric meal replacement control at concurrently reducing adipose tissue and preserving lean tissue during caloric restriction-induced weight loss in elderly obese subjects.

    “Researchers illustrated that the combination of a protein supplement (whey and essential amino acids) with a calorie restricted diet was more effective than a hypocaloric meal replacement control at concurrently reducing adipose tissue and preserving lean tissue during the caloric restriction-induced weight loss in elderly obese subjects [2].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] Coker RH, 2012, Nut J source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Some studies have indicated a possible dose-response relationship regarding BCAA supplementation and body composition.

    “Some studies have indicated a possible dose–response relationship regarding BCAA supplementation and body composition, including a study conducted by Spillane, Emerson, and Willoughby [27].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Spillane M, 2012, Nut & Health source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Thirty days of ingesting 14 g of a BCAA supplement significantly increased lean mass and hand-grip strength in untrained males.

    “Researchers demonstrated that 30 days of ingesting 14 g of a BCAA supplement significantly lean mass and hand-grip strength in untrained males.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] Candeloro N, 1995, Minerva Endocrin

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The variability in experimental approaches adopted by researchers, and the factors investigated, make direct comparisons of studies difficult.

    “The variability in experimental approaches adopted by researchers, and the factors investigated, such as the supplement quantity, treatment duration, timing of ingestion, training status and intensity, and dietary control, make direct comparisons of studies difficult.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    This may have implications in improved muscle performance and recovery.

    “This in turn may have implications in improved muscle performance and recovery.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    There remains controversy regarding the effectiveness of BCAA supplementation on muscle performance and body composition among both trained and untrained persons.

    “Though there remains controversy regarding the effectiveness of BCAA supplementation on muscle performance and body composition among both trained and untrained persons”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Ra et al. found that BCAA supplementation alone was not sufficient to inhibit muscle soreness and damage after a damaging bout of eccentric exercise.

    “However Ra et al. [26] found that BCAA supplementation alone was not sufficient to inhibit muscle soreness and damage after a damaging bout of eccentric exercise [26].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Ra SG, 2013, J Int Soc Sport Nut source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Shimomoura et al. found that oral ingestion of a BCAA supplement before or after exercise improved the recovery of damaged muscles by suppressing endogenous muscle-protein breakdown during exercise.

    “Shimomoura et al. [12] found that oral ingestion of a BCAA supplement before or after exercise improved the recovery of damaged muscles by suppressing the endogenous muscle-protein breakdown during exercise (decreasing the release of essential amino acids from exercising muscles) [12].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] Shimomoura Y, 2010, Int J Sport Nut Ex Met source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Under hypocaloric conditions, those who participate in heavy resistance training can maintain lean mass and muscular performance by utilizing a BCAA product pre and post workout.

    “However, our data suggest that under hypocaloric conditions, those who participate in heavy resistance training can maintain lean mass and muscular performance by utilizing a BCAA product pre and post workout.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Our small sample size allows for robust changes in a few subjects to result in significant group improvements.

    “However, our small sample size allows for robust changes in a few subjects to result in significant group improvements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    There is a greater amount of consensus regarding the effects of BCAA supplements on muscle damage and recovery, which may in turn inform muscle performance (strength and endurance).

    “there is a greater amount of consensus regarding the effects of BCAA supplements on muscle damage and recovery, which may in turn inform muscle performance (strength and endurance).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    While this protocol resulted in a loss of lean mass in the CHO group, the improvement in lower body strength and repetitions to fatigue suggest that minimal CHO supplementation on a cut diet may help to maintain some performance measures.

    “Further, while this protocol resulted in a loss of lean mass in the CHO group, the improvement in lower body strength and repetitions to fatigue suggest that minimal CHO supplementation on a cut diet may help to maintain some performance measures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    With human performance testing it is possible these subjects did not perform to their maximal ability during pre-testing data collection for a variety of reasons.

    “Additionally, with human performance testing it is possible these subjects did not perform to their maximal ability during pre-testing data collection for a variety of reasons (fatigue, distraction, lack of effort, etc.).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
43 of 43
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The two groups did not eat dramatically different foods that would result in amino acid profile differences between them.

    “There is no reason to believe that this group of homogeneous subjects experienced with resistance training and following strict diets, would eat dramatically different foods resulting in amino acid profile differences between the two groups.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The cut diet reduces fat mass by restricting calories and carbohydrates.

    “The “cut diet” is a well-known dieting technique in which calorie and carbohydrate restriction reduces carbohydrate stores in the body and increases fat utilization as fuel, which in turn reduces fat mass.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Subjects complied with the prescribed resistance training program.

    “All subjects performed a progressive bodybuilding split style resistance-training program 4 days per week for the 8 week study duration. Subjects kept a training log during the training period and returned to the lab after 4 weeks to have their training logs reviewed. Lack of compliance with the prescript protocol was grounds for dismissal from the study.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a paucity of studies utilizing the unique combination of a resistance training program, isolated BCAA supplement, and cut diet with which to compare our study.

    “there is a paucity of studies utilizing the unique combination of a resistance training program, isolated BCAA supplement, and cut diet with which to compare our study.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The amount of lean tissue mass is essential in determining metabolic rate, where a greater amount of lean tissue increases RMR.

    “The amount of lean tissue mass is essential in determining metabolic rate, where a greater amount of lean tissue increases RMR.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Lean tissue is more metabolically active than fat tissue, and requires more energy at rest.

    “Lean tissue is more metabolically active than fat tissue, and requires more energy at rest”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interpretation of the second domain, deviations from intended interventions, in seven studies needs caution.

    “The interpretation of the second domain—deviations from intended interventions—in seven studies [26,32,33,35,38,39,42] needs caution.”
  • Negligible effects for the BCAA group were observed in lean tissue and fat mass.

    “Negligible effects for the BCAA group were observed in lean tissue and fat mass [26,27].”
  • In a study of participants on a hypocaloric diet with heavy resistance training across 8 weeks, BCAA supplementation significantly increased upper and lower body strength, while the CHO group had negligible changes in upper body strength.

    “The authors found that BCAA supplementation increased upper (15.1 ± 2.2 kg) and lower body strength (7.1 ± 1.6 kg), significantly, while the CHO group demonstrated negligible changes in upper body strength (4.8 ± 1.8 kg).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • RMR between-group result is reported both ways

    Major

    The Results say the BCAA group's RMR change was not different from the CHO group's, whereas the Discussion says there was a significant difference between the groups.

  • Reported strength test changes from 1RM to 3-RM

    Major

    The Methods specify a one-repetition maximum test for squat and bench press, but the figure presenting the strength changes says they were determined by 3-RM tests.

  • Supplement dose confuses BCAA content with product weight

    Minor

    The supplementation protocol specifies 14 g of actual BCAA in 28 g of product per workout. The Table 2 note instead calls the full 28 g BCAA.

  • Discussion gives a different daily BCAA product amount

    Minor

    The Discussion states that participants ingested 26 g of BCAA product daily, whereas the supplementation protocol specifies 28 g of product per workout.

4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Mielke M, 2009, J Ex Phys, 12, 39
  2. Spillane M, 2012, J Sport Sci Med, 13, 894
  3. Treyzon L, 2008, Jap J Clin Sport Med, 16, 59
  4. Candeloro N, 1995, Minerva Endocrin, 20, 217
  5. Tsujimoto H, 2008, Jap J Clin Sport Med, 16, 59
  6. Lima-Silva AE, 2013, Appl Phys Nut Met, 38, 928

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dudgeon, W. D., Kelley, E. P., & Scheett, T. P.
Affiliations
College of Charleston (US)
Corresponding author
Dudgeon, Wesley David
Venue
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Published
2016-01-05
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
1-1
ISSN
1550-2783 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2230317610
Cited by
57
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Sciavation, Inc.
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Keywords
branched-chain amino acids, amino acid supplementation, resistance training, caloric restriction, hypocaloric diet, lean body mass preservation, fat loss, body composition, muscle strength, muscular endurance, resistance-trained men
MeSH terms
Adult, Amino Acids, Branched-Chain, Body Composition, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Physical Endurance, Diet Records, Body Mass Index, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Muscle, Skeletal, Dietary Supplements, Caloric Restriction, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training, Athletes, Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review