Cited by 74Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysDNA Repair MechanismsTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence

Synthetic lethality of Chk1 inhibition combined with p53 and/or p21 loss during a DNA damage response in normal and tumor cells

Open access
Origanti, S, Cai, S-r, Munir, A Z, White, L S, Piwnica-Worms, H·2013·Oncogene

Abstract

Cell cycle checkpoints ensure genome integrity and are frequently compromised in human cancers. A therapeutic strategy being explored takes advantage of checkpoint defects in p53-deficient tumors in order to sensitize them to DNA-damaging agents by eliminating Chk1-mediated checkpoint responses. Using mouse models, we demonstrated that p21 is a key determinant of how cells respond to the combination of DNA damage and Chk1 inhibition (combination therapy) in normal cells as well as in tumors. Loss of p21 sensitized normal cells to the combination therapy much more than did p53 loss and the enhanced lethality was partially blocked by CDK inhibition. In addition, basal pools of p21 (p53 independent) provided p53 null cells with protection from the combination therapy. Our results uncover a novel p53-independent function for p21 in protecting cells from the lethal effects of DNA damage followed by Chk1 inhibition. As p21 levels are low in a significant fraction of colorectal tumors, they are predicted to be particularly sensitive to the combination therapy. Results reported in this study support this prediction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/onc.2012.84

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Endogenous p21 expression in the S phase protects cancer cells from excessive DNA damage in the S phase and from cell killing by Wee1 and Chk1 kinase inhibitors.

    “Intriguingly, endogenous p21 expression in the S phase was recently reported to protect cancer cells from excessive DNA damage in the S phase, and cell killing by Wee1 (MK1775) and Chk1 (AZD6772) kinase inhibitors [84,85].”
  • Targeting p21 may have positive results in the clinic.

    “the targeting of p21 may have positive results in the clinic [84,85]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]Sedelnikova OA Pilch DR Redon C Bonner WM Histone H2AX in DNA damage and repair Cancer Biol Ther 2003 2 3 233 5 Epub 2003/07/25 12878854

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Origanti, S., Cai, S.-R., Munir, A. Z., White, L. S., & Piwnica-Worms, H.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Piwnica-Worms, H
Venue
Oncogene
Published
2012-03-19
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
577-588
ISSN
  • 0950-9232 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5594
OpenAlex
W2052287702
Cited by
74
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oncogene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American Cancer Society
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (P50CA094056)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM047017, R01GM047017)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Keywords
CHK1 inhibition, p53, p21, DNA damage response, synthetic lethality, cell cycle checkpoints, CDK inhibition, colorectal cancer, combination therapy, tumor cell sensitivity
MeSH terms
Checkpoint Kinase 1, Irinotecan, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic, Camptothecin, DNA Damage, Protein Kinases, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Apoptosis, Mice, Knockout, Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21, Mice, Cell Cycle Checkpoints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review