Cited by 118Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchFluoride Effects and RemovalChemical Analysis and Environmental Impact

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) blood levels after contamination of a community water supply and comparison with 2013–2014 NHANES

Open access
Graber, Judith M., Alexander, Cora, Laumbach, Robert J., Black, Kathleen, Strickland, Pamela Ohman, Georgopoulos, Panos G., Marshall, Elizabeth G., Shendell, Derek G, Alderson, Donald, Mi, Zhongyuan, Mascari, Michael, Weisel, Clifford P.·2019·Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology

Abstract

Introduction Per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), including perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), were detected in the community water supply of Paulsboro New Jersey in 2009.Methods A cross-sectional study enrolled 192 claimants from a class-action lawsuit, not affiliated with this study, who had been awarded a blood test for 13 PFAS. Study participants provided their blood test results and completed a survey about demographics; 105 participants also completed a health survey. Geometric means, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 95th percentiles of exposure of PFNA blood serum concentrations were compared to that of the 2013-2014 NHANES, adjusted for reporting level. Associations between PFNA, PFOA, PFOS, and PFHxS and self-reported health outcomes were assessed using logistic regression.Results PFNA serum levels were 285% higher in Paulsboro compared with U.S. residents. PFNA serum levels were higher among older compared with younger, and male compared to female, Paulsboro residents. After adjustment for potential confounding, there was a significant association between increased serum PFNA levels and self-reported high cholesterol (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.29).Discussion/conclusion Further investigation into possible health effects of PFAS exposure in Paulsboro and other community settings is warranted. Since exposure has ceased, toxicokinetics of PFAS elimination should be explored.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41370-018-0096-z

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Official Journal of the European Union. Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1000 of 13 June 2017 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), its salts and PFOA-related substances. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017R1000&from=EN . June 17, 2018.
  2. International Agency on Cancer Research. List of classifications by cancer sites with sufficient or limited evidence in humans, vol. 1–114. 2015. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/Table4.pdf . March 19, 2018.
  3. Lee SE, FRN. Analyzing Complex Survey Data: Thousand Oaks CA USA. Sage Publications Inc. 2005;71.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 118

Metadata

Authors
Graber, J. M., Alexander, C., Laumbach, R. J., Black, K., Strickland, P. O., Georgopoulos, P. G., Marshall, E. G., Shendell, D. G., Alderson, D., Mi, Z., Mascari, M., & Weisel, C. P.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Graber, Judith M.
Venue
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
Published
2018-11-27
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
172-182
ISSN
  • 1559-0631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-064X
OpenAlex
W2903063066
Cited by
118
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES005022)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fluoride Effects and Removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chemical Analysis and Environmental Impact
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, perfluorononanoic acid, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, perfluorohexanoic acid, class actions, NHANES comparison, serum concentration, hypercholesterolemia, toxicokinetics
MeSH terms
Adult, Caprylates, Cross-Sectional Studies, Environmental Pollutants, Female, Fluorocarbons, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, New Jersey, Nutrition Surveys, Water Pollution, Chemical, Water Supply, Biomarkers, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review