Cited by 777Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFluorine in Organic Chemistry

Trends in Exposure to Polyfluoroalkyl Chemicals in the U.S. Population: 1999−2008

Kato, Kayoko, Wong, Lee-Yang, Jia, Lily T., Kuklenyik, Zsuzsanna, Calafat, Antonia M.·2011·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Since 2002, practices in manufacturing polyfluoroalkyl chemicals (PFCs) in the United States have changed. Previous results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) documented a significant decrease in serum concentrations of some PFCs during 1999-2004. To further assess concentration trends of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorooctanoate (PFOA), perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS), and perfluorononanoate (PFNA), we analyzed 7876 serum samples collected from a representative sample of the general U.S. population ≥12 years of age during NHANES 1999-2008. We detected PFOS, PFOA, PFNA, and PFHxS in more than 95% of participants. Concentrations differed by sex regardless of age and we observed some differences by race/ethnicity. Since 1999-2000, PFOS concentrations showed a significant downward trend, because of discontinuing industrial production of PFOS, but PFNA concentrations showed a significant upward trend. PFOA concentrations during 1999-2000 were significantly higher than during any other time period examined, but PFOA concentrations have remained essentially unchanged during 2003-2008. PFHxS concentrations showed a downward trend from 1999 to 2006, but concentrations increased during 2007-2008. Additional research is needed to identify the environmental sources contributing to human exposure to PFCs. Nonetheless, these NHANES data suggest that sociodemographic factors may influence exposure and also provide unique information on temporal trends of exposure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es1043613

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kato, K., Wong, L.-Y., Jia, L. T., Kuklenyik, Z., & Calafat, A. M.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Calafat, Antonia M.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2011-04-06
Volume
45
Issue
19
Pages
8037-8045
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2066634548
Cited by
777
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 39
FWCI
37.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
Keywords
PFOS, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFHxS, perfluorononanoate, serum concentration, temporal trends, human exposure, sex differences, racial and ethnic differences, sociodemographic factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Caprylates, Child, Environmental Exposure, Female, Fluorocarbons, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Nutrition Surveys, Sulfonic Acids, Time Factors, United States, Age Distribution, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review